Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
73. The letter clearly stated that they wanted contraceptives tied to the CR and debt ceiling
Wed Oct 9, 2013, 07:50 AM
Oct 2013

Rug claimed they never mentioned the debt ceiling, this is completely false.

Pushing a dirty CR is what resulted in the shutdown and it was well known that such a thing would result in a shutdown, the bishops encouraged the Teabaggers to push a dirty CR well knowing that this could result in shutdown. The headline is accurate.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

When do they lose their tax exemption? arthritisR_US Oct 2013 #1
sounds like an item worth shutting the govt down over. nt Ilsa Oct 2013 #3
Tax them 80 %...... russspeakeasy Oct 2013 #2
jeez...how sick is that? stillcool Oct 2013 #4
Does this surprise you? MattBaggins Oct 2013 #13
it does...I am used to... stillcool Oct 2013 #22
If they're going to fuck as all, they least they can do is use protection. NuclearDem Oct 2013 #5
This is the kind of crap that makes so many of us despise this church Arugula Latte Oct 2013 #6
+infinity sammytko Oct 2013 #8
Don't forget the Crusades. rug Oct 2013 #9
There is plenty of modern-day crap this bunch of medieval creeps is pulling Arugula Latte Oct 2013 #11
Read the letter they sent. rug Oct 2013 #12
I will never stand for being smeared as a "bigot" for calling out this vile institution. Dawson Leery Oct 2013 #26
That's an overwrought headline. They didn't call for a shutdown. rug Oct 2013 #7
They specifically called for it to be tied to "must pass" legislation Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #14
Which is not the same as calling for a shutdown. rug Oct 2013 #15
When the GOP attached The Obamacare delay to must pass legislation it triggered the shut down Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #17
The GOP wants the ACA stopped. Period. rug Oct 2013 #18
They asked to tie their "conscience exemption" most the country opposes to must pass legislation Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #21
Yes they did and that request will fail in the trash to join most of their other requests. rug Oct 2013 #23
Must pass legislation means the budget, it means the debt ceiling Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #24
It didn't say a word about the debt ceiling, any more than it said a word about the shutdown. rug Oct 2013 #25
Again it said MUST PASS legislation, that means either budget, debt ceiling or both Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #28
Words do matter. And those words were not used. rug Oct 2013 #29
Yes they were used, look at the very first link you provided me Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #30
And? Here's your headline: "Catholic Bishops wrote letter to GOP calling for shutdown" rug Oct 2013 #34
So I suppose you are going to tell me the GOP Congress members are not calling for shutdown either Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #39
Accuracy matters, too. randome Oct 2013 #31
Yes accuracy does matter and Rug's own link shows that he is wrong Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #33
Your own headline shows that you are wrong. rug Oct 2013 #35
No it does not, we are in this shutdown because of policy tied to the continued resolution Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #37
"Catholic Bishops wrote letter to GOP calling for shutdown". That's the headline you wrote. rug Oct 2013 #38
Do you think the teabaggers pushing a dirty CR support a shutdown? Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #40
Say what you want about the RCC, it is far from the Tea Party. rug Oct 2013 #41
They reached out to the Tea Party to push a dirty resolution Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #42
So, are you moving back from shutdown? rug Oct 2013 #43
Hell no I'm not moving back, supporting a dirty CR is supporting the shut down Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #44
For one thing, they were seeking a specific exemption. rug Oct 2013 #45
Maybe the Republicans would take it, it does not change the fact that the bishops pushed a dirty CR Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #46
Then you'd be better off using their actual words, not yours. rug Oct 2013 #47
Sorry, I am not obligated to spin things the way they want me to spin them Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #48
I guess you're not obligated to write accurate headlines either. rug Oct 2013 #50
As I said it is my opinion, this is a discussion site opinions are welcome here Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #51
Well, I'm glad we've established that you headline is, in the end, simply your opinion. rug Oct 2013 #53
It is an opinion based on concrete facts. Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #54
There's definitely concrete involed. rug Oct 2013 #59
Did they or did they not ask for contraceptives to be tied to the debt ceiling? Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #64
No, Rug's link shows that he is correct. Fortinbras Armstrong Oct 2013 #69
The letter clearly stated that they wanted contraceptives tied to the CR and debt ceiling Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #73
Yes, the letter said that Fortinbras Armstrong Oct 2013 #74
The letter of the 26th talks about the debt ceiling in the same sentence muriel_volestrangler Oct 2013 #32
While you review #34, I'll ask you when you found the Gospels a good source for political science. rug Oct 2013 #36
Oh dear, rug, your defence of the RC bishops and the shutdown isn't looking good on DU, is it? muriel_volestrangler Oct 2013 #60
Oh, the subthread in which the OP stated the headline is his opinion, not fact? rug Oct 2013 #65
I stated it was an opinion based on concrete fact, I NEVER claimed it was not based on fact. Bjorn Against Oct 2013 #67
No, it is an opinion based on a single phrase, "must pass legislation" Fortinbras Armstrong Oct 2013 #81
Well they ARE ACTIVELY LOBBYING and thus forfeit tax exempt status elehhhhna Oct 2013 #57
The OP makes the false claim that the USCCB called for the shutdown. rug Oct 2013 #58
Thanks for pointing it out MFrohike Oct 2013 #19
Well, it's a damn accurate paraphrase. rug Oct 2013 #20
How about this for a headline, these Bishops want to tie their silly superstitions... Humanist_Activist Oct 2013 #61
How about this? Poster sees political crisis as a religious crisis. rug Oct 2013 #66
Or how about this? Thinkprogress writer lies about letter from Catholic bishops. Fortinbras Armstrong Oct 2013 #70
Maybe not. AngryOldDem Oct 2013 #63
That group is allowed wayyyyyyy too much power MattBaggins Oct 2013 #10
But don't forget- Mark Meadows (R-NC) is the Architect of the current shutdown plan Tx4obama Oct 2013 #16
Is it sedition yet?? kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #27
American bishops still going their own way. Peregrine Took Oct 2013 #49
What would Pope Francis say? Sanity Claws Oct 2013 #52
What is needed is for the Federal government to revoke the tax-exempt status for the entire freakin' indepat Oct 2013 #55
Given that the Catholic Church is NOT "formeting rebellion" against the United States Fortinbras Armstrong Oct 2013 #71
So urging a governmental shutdown is aok if what you want can't be extorted? indepat Oct 2013 #75
Except that they are NOT "urging a government shutdown" Fortinbras Armstrong Oct 2013 #79
Thanks for clarifying this issue indepat Oct 2013 #83
Then they might as well shut down Catholic churches as well Zambero Oct 2013 #56
So they're allowed to shut down the Federal Government... Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #62
These Bishops need to go read that interveiw by the Pope kydo Oct 2013 #68
Maybe they don't think he's serious. bklyncowgirl Oct 2013 #72
Tax 'em! nt City Lights Oct 2013 #76
My friend is a pharamacist who is Catholic fitman Oct 2013 #77
Blowback...incessent demands for shutting government by every fringe idea under the sun. libdem4life Oct 2013 #78
I read the letter that Rug posted again. AngryOldDem Oct 2013 #80
Who the hell do they think they are?! fucking nose outta Cha Oct 2013 #82
Why would anybody give a flying rat's ass what these shitstains have to say? MindPilot Oct 2013 #84
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Catholic Bishops wrote le...»Reply #73