Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
47. Because tinfoil hatters shot down the secure digital ID initiative
Wed Oct 9, 2013, 12:36 PM
Oct 2013

The basic problem is that there is no uniform system for online digital ID verification.


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20027837-501465.html

The Obama administration is currently drafting what it's calling the National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace, which Locke said will be released by the president in the next few months. (An early version was publicly released last summer.)

"We are not talking about a national ID card," Locke said at the Stanford event. "We are not talking about a government-controlled system. What we are talking about is enhancing online security and privacy, and reducing and perhaps even eliminating the need to memorize a dozen passwords, through creation and use of more trusted digital identities."

The Commerce Department will be setting up a national program office to work on this project, Locke said.

Details about the "trusted identity" project are remarkably scarce. Last year's announcement referenced a possible forthcoming smart card or digital certificate that would prove that online users are who they say they are. These digital IDs would be offered to consumers by online vendors for financial transactions.

Schmidt stressed today that anonymity and pseudonymity will remain possible on the Internet. "I don't have to get a credential, if I don't want to," he said. There's no chance that "a centralized database will emerge," and "we need the private sector to lead the implementation of this," he said.

Jim Dempsey of the Center for Democracy and Technology, who spoke later at the event, said any Internet ID must be created by the private sector--and also voluntary and competitive.

"The government cannot create that identity infrastructure," Dempsey said. "If it tried to, it wouldn't be trusted."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

To earn their $78 million leftstreet Oct 2013 #1
While they are earning money, there is a valid reason for this. Fawke Em Oct 2013 #13
Experian CEO salary: $3.7 million leftstreet Oct 2013 #23
"Experian leads the way in customer protection" - Those swindlers can suck my balls. I applied for a Erose999 Oct 2013 #61
Can you IM me on this? Fawke Em Oct 2013 #64
lowest bidder. CK_John Oct 2013 #2
Too many c(r)ooks spoil the plot Demeter Oct 2013 #3
They seem to be the big holdup now.... Junkdrawer Oct 2013 #4
It's called corporate welfare. It is a common phenomenon under fascism. n/t Egalitarian Thug Oct 2013 #5
because ACA is a step along the way to taking health care out of the hands of big business... KG Oct 2013 #6
So that they can prep you for your microchip? Lex Oct 2013 #7
if you write big campaign checks datasuspect Oct 2013 #8
to give rightwingers something to complain about nt geek tragedy Oct 2013 #9
LOL: Guess what memo must have gone about this morning? FSogol Oct 2013 #11
I didn't get a memo, but I find privatizing reprehensible leftstreet Oct 2013 #15
Same here. One party promotes privatization, one doesn't. Do you know the difference? FSogol Oct 2013 #16
Which party promoted the ACA? leftstreet Oct 2013 #25
It is so hard to keep track. Do you hate the ACA just like the Tea Party or FSogol Oct 2013 #35
Thx for your interest in my personal opinions leftstreet Oct 2013 #41
ODSing complaints about details of the ACA is a bad trend seveneyes Oct 2013 #53
Privatizing government functions is bad. When the government tracks the weather, they do it FSogol Oct 2013 #56
Medicaid always used these agencies. ProSense Oct 2013 #30
Too bad this chance to break from a bad habit was lost seveneyes Oct 2013 #55
A rightwinger who posts from memos? Junkdrawer Oct 2013 #17
As someone who has enlightenment Oct 2013 #10
+1 KoKo Oct 2013 #50
interestingly, the "it's a first step" talking point came AFTER the "we'll fix it later" one MisterP Oct 2013 #59
I think we're now moving into the enlightenment Oct 2013 #60
Maybe with the ACA so controversial..they though using a credit agency KoKo Oct 2013 #12
Verify income???? That's new. I thought it was only identites? Junkdrawer Oct 2013 #14
It's about seeing if you are actually eligible for the ACA's subsidies, PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #20
They're supposed just to be using it to verify identity n/t Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #21
Are you sure about that? Because your SS# is all that's needed KoKo Oct 2013 #37
It's about determining if you are legitimately eligible for the ACA's subsidies... PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #18
Ah, thanks Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #22
Thanks for that. nt NYC_SKP Oct 2013 #40
Well...that's an informative but depressing read, for sure. KoKo Oct 2013 #46
Interesting. How in the world could Equifax know what we pay for health care coverage DebJ Oct 2013 #49
I think it's that they can verify your income not what you pay for heath care KoKo Oct 2013 #57
I was fine with going through Experian to get my Medicaid BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #19
Guess what? enlightenment Oct 2013 #24
It's about people on DU helping fuel rumors and distrust Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #39
No, it's about having a civil discussion. enlightenment Oct 2013 #54
People who are trying to dismantle this law by sabotaging the website.... Junkdrawer Oct 2013 #26
Why reinvent the wheel when Experian was available? BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #28
Experian is now the big holdup.... Junkdrawer Oct 2013 #31
do you have a link? VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #27
You can read more about the issue at this link... PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #33
I don't believe it is for a credit check.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #62
Right, Equifax is only used to veryify income/employment, when they can't get the info PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #63
Because they have marketed themselves as identity confirmation specialists Gormy Cuss Oct 2013 #29
The ole Private Sector workaround. Made news during the NSA scandals this summer... Junkdrawer Oct 2013 #36
Agree...but, the IRS can also verify who you are by SS# and can verify KoKo Oct 2013 #42
hire more employees Enrique Oct 2013 #52
Will this show up as an inquiry on your report? B2G Oct 2013 #32
Well, one thing is certain. ProSense Oct 2013 #34
Experian ISN'T being used to verify identities? Junkdrawer Oct 2013 #38
Where on earth did I say that in the comment? ProSense Oct 2013 #44
Oh? What OTHER "lack of understanding about the law" do you get from my OP? Junkdrawer Oct 2013 #48
it was a good question Enrique Oct 2013 #43
So ProSense Oct 2013 #45
Because tinfoil hatters shot down the secure digital ID initiative jberryhill Oct 2013 #47
What about the digital Pins I use to submit taxes and FAFSA reports? Junkdrawer Oct 2013 #51
....which are used for those purposes jberryhill Oct 2013 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is Experian, A Credit...»Reply #47