Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)

12. The Founders expected to have "farmer" representatives....

Reply to Blue_Tires (Reply #7)

Wed Oct 9, 2013, 12:41 PM

Oct 2013

who would serve a term or two in the House and maybe a term in the Senate and then return to their normal lives.

We have career politicians....

We passed an Amendment to limit Presidents to no more than 2 4-year terms. I don't see why we don't say max 8 years in the House and 12 years in the Senate.

This would eliminate these cretins from looking only to the next election. They might actually think about what is either good for the country or for their "long-term" legacies.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

congressional elections should be held once in 4 years .. here is why [View all] srican69 Oct 2013 OP

I'd just as soon rather see term limits Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #1

i'd not .. institutional memory has its advantages ... srican69 Oct 2013 #4

I see nothing wrong with say Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #7

The Founders expected to have "farmer" representatives.... Swede Atlanta Oct 2013 #12

And I believe the opposite jeff47 Oct 2013 #14

But it would knock out a lot of good people, too treestar Oct 2013 #19

Lobbyist already run it... awoke_in_2003 Oct 2013 #9

agreed ... srican69 Oct 2013 #18

What is the problem to which this change is a solution? Xipe Totec Oct 2013 #2

if 2010 were a presidential election year - we wouldn't having this crap. srican69 Oct 2013 #5

I think I understand - Tie congressional elections to presidential cycle? Xipe Totec Oct 2013 #21

Sorry - no recall brooklynite Oct 2013 #3

Mandatory voting. Rod Beauvex Oct 2013 #6

+a billion (nt) jeff47 Oct 2013 #13

That is bullshit. Requiring someone to fill out a ballot Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #15

If Jury is Mandatory - then why not voting. srican69 Oct 2013 #20

if the house (2 years) and senate (6 years) are both dysfunctional, why would 4 years work? unblock Oct 2013 #8

force everything to 4 years .... srican69 Oct 2013 #16

In The Current 2 Year Term Those Elected Begin Running For Re-election.... global1 Oct 2013 #10

#3 is false. jeff47 Oct 2013 #11

Interesting idea treestar Oct 2013 #17

Good idea. All terms should be 4 years, and elections held at the same time as pres. election n/t Blaukraut Oct 2013 #22