Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

A HERETIC I AM

(24,903 posts)
46. You clearly are not very well versed on this subject.
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 02:12 AM
Oct 2013

So let me put your two posts together;

You said, in response to the OP;

Interest on the debt is safe. But return of principal is a legitimate concern. Especially so for the 90 day paper.


That is simply not true. The OP is referring to an article that states Fidelity "no longer holds any U.S. government debt that comes due around the time the nation could hit its borrowing limit." Your statement that the "interest on the debt is safe" is nonsense because the paper they have sold DOES NOT MAKE INTEREST PAYMENTS. It is Zero Coupon paper that is bought at a discount to par and matures at par. The difference is the yield. When they are redeemed by the Treasury they pay the par value. If the yield was 2% for example, the US Treasury is not going to just pay 2%, they are going to redeem the whole thing. The primary risk in this entire scenario is that after the 17th, unless Congress raises the debt limit, the US Treasury will not have the money to either redeem a series that is maturing or make a coupon payment that is due. Either or both of those are by definition, a default.

Here is a screen grab from Treasaurydirect.com that shows all the securities maturing between now (10/11/13) and November 10


There are 4 issues maturing on the 17th of this month totaling roughly $120 billion. THAT is what the Treasury is really worried about. And they are ALL Zero Coupon issues. They must be redeemed at par or the Treasury will have defaulted.


You are describing only one variety of Treasury instrument.


I am describing the exact type of Treasury instruments that Fidelity is selling. Short term, Zero Coupon paper.

Most Treasury investors are receiving interest (though not a lot) on a steady principal.


While it is true that the vast majority of the nations debt is in longer term paper and that paper pays biannual interest payments (the Coupon) the last portion of that sentence makes NO SENSE with regard to the holding of a bond of ANY type. "On a steady principal"?!? Are you aware that the price of a bond fluctuates? Are you aware that they can both rise AND fall in value? Are you aware that regardless of what you pay for it, bonds mature at "Par" and the coupon percentage paid is figured off that par value? Do you know what Par is? Do you know how much in dollars the standard is?

The value of a given lot of ANY type of bond will by NO MEANS stay "Steady" during the time you hold it. The value of a bond fluctuates all the time, with virtually every trade. If someone else sells a block of the same bonds you hold for LESS than you paid for them, the value of your holdings will FALL. What stays steady on bonds that pay a coupon is that very thing - the coupon rate. Coupon rate does not change, with very few exceptions (T.I.P.S. are an example)

Why would you introduce uncertainty just to upset people or cause them doubt or concern?


I am doing no such thing. I am providing accurate information. If that question was rhetorical, I can assure you Fidelity did not do this with the intent of introducing uncertainty. They did it because the Prospectus for the affected Money Market Mutual Funds REQUIRES IT.

Zeroes have their place, but they have little to do with most people's holdings.


Really? How many Americans hold Money Market funds? As a general rule, most average investors do not buy individual lots of shorter term Treasuries, that is true, but if they own a money market fund, they are in there, I guarantee it.

Including most bank holdings, which is what most people's bank accounts are holding, indirectly.


I would be very interested in seeing where you got that notion. Do you think your bank is buying ten year paper with your savings account? Is that what you are insinuating? Because nothing could be further from the truth.

If you go to this page from Treasury Direct and click on the "go" button next to "All Treasury Securities" "By Auction Date". When that opens, set the "From" month to September and click "Search". That will show you all the varying maturities of Treasury Notes, Bills and Bonds sold at auction for the last month, everything from 5 day to 30 year. Under the column that says "Interest Rate" you will see that the notation "n/a" is present and it is ONLY present on paper with maturities shorter than 2 years. That means all those with the n/a appearing are ZERO COUPON BONDS. Even though they call them Bills and Notes, they are technically still Bonds.

Please don't profess to school me when it is clear by reading what you wrote that you barely have a parochial understanding of the subject.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Brinkmanship... Junkdrawer Oct 2013 #1
That is anyone's guess. roamer65 Oct 2013 #10
Rachael mentioned this on her show. nt BumRushDaShow Oct 2013 #2
I heard about this on her show and then went and found the article Gothmog Oct 2013 #53
yikes flamingdem Oct 2013 #3
Rachael said they were the largest holder of mutual funds. BumRushDaShow Oct 2013 #7
Oh! Well that's better but.. flamingdem Oct 2013 #15
The cost of borrowing is going up Gothmog Oct 2013 #21
They don't hold them... A HERETIC I AM Oct 2013 #33
Interest on the debt is safe. But return of principal is a legitimate concern. Loudly Oct 2013 #4
Well, there you have it Brother Buzz Oct 2013 #12
Can you explain to the financially challenged flamingdem Oct 2013 #17
The dollar amount of your investment in Treasury notes (bills) is the principal. Loudly Oct 2013 #20
The friggin' principal is a mirage, there is little to no worth underlying it, jtuck004 Oct 2013 #28
Nonsense. A HERETIC I AM Oct 2013 #37
Fine. Show me the underlying worth. In 1960, milions of people working, producing, jtuck004 Oct 2013 #42
There isn't a single thing you are complaining about... Loudly Oct 2013 #45
That's too shortsighted. It would be like supporting an insurgency by giving them bullets jtuck004 Oct 2013 #66
True. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #70
Don't talk shit about principal. Loudly Oct 2013 #38
Of course it is. And do you think the Mi$$ RobMe crowd gives a flying rat's ass about them? jtuck004 Oct 2013 #44
Give me that $1,500 in hindsight. Loudly Oct 2013 #47
Why would one want to willingly participate and profit from the destruction of their jtuck004 Oct 2013 #64
We are a society. We all live off the same economy, the same practice of exchanging value for work JDPriestly Oct 2013 #69
No - we live with others. Only some of us live off of others. jtuck004 Oct 2013 #73
Why thank you Loudly flamingdem Oct 2013 #34
That is an incorrect statement. For any treasury security shorter than 2 years... A HERETIC I AM Oct 2013 #35
You are describing only one variety of Treasury instrument. Loudly Oct 2013 #40
You clearly are not very well versed on this subject. A HERETIC I AM Oct 2013 #46
Again, I think you are slicing and dicing a portion of the debt. Loudly Oct 2013 #48
Again, don't profess to school me on this subject. A HERETIC I AM Oct 2013 #49
You are trying to make the case that zero coupons dominate the landscape. Loudly Oct 2013 #50
Oh, for fucks sake. A HERETIC I AM Oct 2013 #52
My retirement accounts are with Fidelity Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2013 #5
Have you sold? n/t A HERETIC I AM Oct 2013 #13
So is mine, but will be defined benefit. Did you have it in a 401K? freshwest Oct 2013 #22
I have both a 401K and a managed IRA Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2013 #24
Okay, I've never had either of those. Just the defined benefit. It kicks in if everyhing doesn't go freshwest Oct 2013 #26
You made a bundle this year if you lost $15,000 since this started. dkf Oct 2013 #29
Yes Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2013 #30
Well it wasn't about to go up up up forever. dkf Oct 2013 #31
October coincides with a natural downturn built into the market cycle. Loudly Oct 2013 #41
I love nightmare scenarios in the morning nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #6
I'd bet the Federal Reserve bought most of them. roamer65 Oct 2013 #8
I expect that too, nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #11
Up or down in direction? flamingdem Oct 2013 #19
Aaaand we're a little bit closer to fucked. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #9
They're all doing it nt TomClash Oct 2013 #14
Wrench your eyes off the Orange One + the rest of the clowns and watch these stories riderinthestorm Oct 2013 #16
I hear the sound of Ben Bernanke's helicopter, I do believe. roamer65 Oct 2013 #18
Someone will benefit financially from this crisis; hope kiranon Oct 2013 #23
Koch Bros are Shorting Stocks. They tank the country to make a killing Katashi_itto Oct 2013 #32
But the Kocks said they're not doing this... blkmusclmachine Oct 2013 #36
.... Katashi_itto Oct 2013 #39
With his Black swan fund Eric Cantor bet against the US in the last debt ceiling fight stuffmatters Oct 2013 #71
OP title is misleading...that's not what the article says antigop Oct 2013 #25
The title of this thread is the same as the article quoted. Gothmog Oct 2013 #54
no, the title of the referenced article is: Fidelity sells short-term T-bills antigop Oct 2013 #56
Everybody needs to be aware of the Republicans talking openly Warpy Oct 2013 #27
They sold then because yields went up Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #43
and the first canary in the coal mine DonCoquixote Oct 2013 #51
I maintain, if the halfwit repukes don't give in, there will be a massive sell off late tomorrow. Javaman Oct 2013 #55
no sweat, folks--PIMCO's buying 'em. lastlib Oct 2013 #57
Exactly. I was coming in to post this. The company is highly respected and they do not seem too seabeyond Oct 2013 #59
interesting. Pre-edit title of OP was correct. Why did you edit it to inaccurate? magical thyme Oct 2013 #58
I called attention to the misleading title in post #25 antigop Oct 2013 #60
my point is that the OP initially used an accurate title magical thyme Oct 2013 #62
Yes, Virginia, Wall Street is shorting America. malthaussen Oct 2013 #61
I am 69 and have all my IRA in Fidelity Treasuries Only MM pangaia Oct 2013 #63
No. A HERETIC I AM Oct 2013 #65
Whew. Thanks pangaia Oct 2013 #67
Think of it. Only the Republican members of Congress know how and when this artificial crisis JDPriestly Oct 2013 #68
Cantor got away with it last time stuffmatters Oct 2013 #72
I've been saying this for days. Ilsa Oct 2013 #74
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fidelity has sold all of ...»Reply #46