Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ProSense

(116,464 posts)

1. No,

Reply to dkf (Original post)

Sun Mar 4, 2012, 01:43 PM

Mar 2012

"Is getting Limbaugh to apologize really that much of a triumph...I guess the triumph is in getting Limbaugh to apologize..."

..the triumph would be getting that blowhard fired. No apology from this cretin will be sincere.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Seems to me the Limbaugh/Fluke situation reinforces the whole "women are weaker" thing. [View all] dkf Mar 2012 OP

No, ProSense Mar 2012 #1

I don't think Limbaugh can be said to come out of this looking "powerful." Jester Messiah Mar 2012 #2

Yet Limbaugh doesn't need defenders. dkf Mar 2012 #8

wow, limpballs doesn't need defenders? newspeak Mar 2012 #9

I doubt he personally feels like he needs to be defended. dkf Mar 2012 #10

It's doing what forced him to apologize that is the victory. mmonk Mar 2012 #3

Maybe God/Fate will get pissed and deal with Limbaugh the way Breitbart was dealt with. Lint Head Mar 2012 #4

Carefully parsed it wasn't really an apology.. Fumesucker Mar 2012 #5

Women look weak if ALL we'll accept is an apology mainer Mar 2012 #6

Who asked for the apology? DURHAM D Mar 2012 #7

The bigger picture to me is he/they blinked! madmom Mar 2012 #11

So what does it mean when people band together to defend a man? Luminous Animal Mar 2012 #12