Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Nat'l Journal: Republicans Close to Violating the Constitution [View all]jmowreader
(53,420 posts)17. No, they go a little farther than that
Your Standard Teabagger respects two parts of the Constitution: the Second Amendment, and the nearly-meaningless Tenth. The rest of it is outdated, too boring or itself unconstitutional. (I was told by a teabagger at the County Fair that the Sixteenth Amendment was unconstitutional, so he didn't have to abide by it. Yeah, Idaho is the greatest state...)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Because while the President would be obeying the 14th amendment, he would be breaking
stevenleser
Oct 2013
#40
K&R!! I'm sure most Re/Teapuke have committed several crimes for which they should've been arrested.
hue
Oct 2013
#10
Everyone knows the only REAL part about the Constitution is to have guns, guns
joeybee12
Oct 2013
#11
The Constitution. In GOP circles, it's better known as "that g/ddamn piece of paper."
blkmusclmachine
Oct 2013
#24
So who would have standing to take them to court, and what would be the punishment of violating
Agnosticsherbet
Oct 2013
#26