Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 06:29 AM Oct 2013

Yes, Terry McAuliffe has a sleazy as hell financial history. [View all]

Yesterday, lots of DUers had a fit about my pointing out the TRUE story about Sleazeball Terry's investment in a shady scheme to defraud dying people.

Prefer Terry over Cuccianelli? So do I. But I'm not willing to erase his background just because of that. He's the worst kind of corporate dem. Better than Cuccianelli? Yeah, just about anyone is better.

So yes, McAuliffe fucking damn well did make that investment and he accepted big campaign bucks from Caramadre.

The facts about McAuliffe can be denied from now until the end of time and they will still be facts.

I NEVER made the phony AP claims. I simply said he was an investor in this vile scheme and I caught holy hell for that with people demanding I take down the FACTS.

Here:

<snip>

Even after the AP retraction, the scheme is one that no political hopeful would want their name associated with. Caramadre and Radhakrishnan were accused of aiming to make money by signing up terminally ill and elderly people for annuities and bonds, paid out to investors after the people’s deaths to the tune of millions of dollars, according to an indictment and news reports.

McAuliffe has tried to repair some of the damage. “The allegations are horrible and he never would have invested if he knew he was being deceived,” spokesman Josh Schwerin said in a statement. McAuliffe and his campaign donated $74,000 to the American Cancer Society, Schwerin said. That amount is intended to offset the sum of campaign contributions McAuliffe received from Caramadre plus returns the candidate made from the investment, Schwerin said.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/terry-mcauliffe-investment-virginia-governors-race-2013-98152.html#ixzz2hPKHr72d

And here:

<snip>

In 1985, McAuliffe helped found the Federal City National Bank, a small bank based in Washington, D.C.[5] In January 1988, when he was 30 years old, the bank’s board elected McAuliffe chairman, making him the youngest elected chairman of a federally chartered bank in the history of the United States.[6]

The bank loaned $125,000 to a political action committee that supported Richard Gephardt's presidential campaign. McAuliffe told The New York Times that he abstained from voting on the loan because he was also the Gephardt campaign's finance chairman.[7] The bank also provided loans to former U.S. Representative Tony Coelho and the then-Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, Jim Wright.[8]

In 1991, the bank was cited by federal regulators for unsafe or unsound business practices. McAuliffe helped to negotiate a merger with Credit International Bank (then under the management of Republican Richard V. Allen), which he called his "greatest business experience".[8] McAuliffe went on to become vice chairman of the newly merged bank, leading to questions from shareholders that he was given special treatment, which Allen denied.[8][9]

In 1979, McAuliffe met Richard Swann, a lawyer who was in charge of fundraising for Jimmy Carter's presidential campaign in Florida. In 1988, McAuliffe married Swann's daughter, Dorothy.

In the late 1980s, Swann's finances collapsed, entangling McAuliffe, who then used his political contacts to help Swann.[8] In 1990, federal regulators seized Swann's American Pioneer Savings Bank, causing Swann to file for bankruptcy and McAuliffe to lose $800,000 he had invested in American Pioneer.[8] The Resolution Trust Corporation, a federal agency, took over American Pioneer's assets and liabilities and sued McAuliffe and a former unit of the bank foreclose on a real estate loan.[8] Under the guidance of Swann, McAuliffe partnered with a pension fund controlled by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and the National Electrical Contractors Association to buy some American Pioneer real estate, valued at $50 million, for $38.7 million from the Resolution Trust Corporation.[8][10] Of the purchase amount, McAuliffe paid $100, while the pension fund paid $38.7 million;[8] McAuliffe still received a 50% equity stake.[10] The deal was arranged by pension fund trustee Jack Moore, who was an acquaintance of McAuliffe from the Gephardt presidential campaign.[8][10] McAuliffe used some of the proceeds from the deal to purchase Jefferson National Title Insurance, a Florida company, and sold back some of McAuliffe's shares to the pension fund.[8] The Department of Labor then filed a lawsuit against McAuliffe and Moore, accusing them of imprudent business practices in the deal and also in a $6 million loan the fund made to a real estate company controlled by McAuliffe, which McAuliffe used to clear up his father-in-law's debt but soon defaulted on the loan.[8] With the help of a fundraising contact, McAuliffe bought a troubled house-building company that had been buying some of the land formerly held by Swann's bank and became its chairman.[8] After his bankruptcy, McAuliffe paid Swann to "help with the management" of his companies.[

In 2009, McAuliffe founded GreenTech Automotive, a holding company he then used to purchase the Chinese electric car company EU Auto MyCar for $20 million in May 2010.[18][19] McAuliffe moved the company headquarters to McLean, Virginia and built its manufacturing plant in Mississippi.[20][21]

McAuliffe resigned from GreenTech sometime before December 1, 2012. McAuliffe did not announce the resignation until several months later, and continued touting the company on the campaign trail.[22] McAuliffe's gubernatorial campaign spokesman said McAuliffe had "verbally" announced his intention to resign before running for governor.[22] McAuliffe still has a significant ownership stake in GreenTech.[23]

In December 2012, McAuliffe was questioned as to why he chose to locate the factory in Mississippi as opposed to Virginia. McAuliffe claimed that he wanted to bring the factory to Virginia but the Virginia Economic Development Partnership, the state's business recruitment agency, chose not to bid on it.[24] However, in January 2013, PolitiFact declared McAuliffe's claim to be false, reporting from emails obtained from VEDP under the Freedom of Information Act that VEDP was interested in building the factory in Virginia, and its representatives toured potential sites with GreenTech representatives, but GreenTech went ahead with the Mississippi plant before VEDP could complete its due diligence.[24] McAuliffe said he disagreed with PolitiFact's report, and said other GreenTech executives made the decision, but did not offer specifics as to how the report was mistaken.[25]

In April 2013, Watchdog.org obtained more emails and in a series of reports on GreenTech and McAuliffe revealed that VEDP was wary of GreenTech's financing because it relied heavily on the EB-5 visa program which provides green cards to foreign nationals who invest money in the United States. On April 12, 2013, GreenTech filed an $85 million lawsuit against Watchdog.org, alleging libel and saying the site's reports jeopardized millions of dollars in investments.[18][26] Watchdog.org has denied that it committed libel and McAuliffe's campaign has declined to comment and referred questions to GreenTech.[18] In July 2013, President Barack Obama's nominee for Deputy Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security came under investigation by the department's inspector general for mismanaging the EB-5 program and was accused of giving special treatment to McAuliffe and GreenTech,[27] while in August 2013, it was revealed that GreenTech had been under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission since May 2013 for the EB-5 program.[28] On August 16, 2013, McAuliffe wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post and said he had learned of the SEC investigation two weeks prior, and that the document in question was prepared for potential investors, which he wrote was not something he was responsible for as chairman.[29]

In October 2013, Watchdog.org obtained emails that showed McAuliffe pressured Homeland Security officials to grant visas for GreenTech's foreign investors, and warned that the company's Mississippi plant would close immediately if the visas were not granted within days.[30][31][32]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_McAuliffe

It's dangerous to deny reality and to pretend someone is something they aren't. I'm sorry VA dems aren't running a better candidate. That he's better than the vile, crazy religiously insane wingnut he's running against is faint praise indeed.

216 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Blind loyalty to McAuliffe seveneyes Oct 2013 #1
thanks and yes. he is up to his neck in filth and he always has been. cali Oct 2013 #2
He's got a (D) by his name Puzzledtraveller Oct 2013 #89
When it comes to growing our majority in the Senate BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #127
He's running for governor karynnj Oct 2013 #137
Yeah, just found out. So, I'll change that to growing our majority in STATES, then. eom BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #140
Did you really say that? That we Dems should not care how sleazy a person sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #195
We can't be putting purity tests on politicians. If you do that, Republicans will continue to win BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #199
As a Virginian.... RichGirl Oct 2013 #187
dont back down reddread Oct 2013 #3
thank you and sorry about misinterpreting your posts yesterday cali Oct 2013 #4
not a problem reddread Oct 2013 #5
Once apon a time on DU you couldn't bash Democratic candidates right before an election. FSogol Oct 2013 #6
I agree, wtf! B Calm Oct 2013 #7
Alert away, friend. I have clearly said that I support McAuliffe cali Oct 2013 #8
Thank You Cali. dotymed Oct 2013 #39
I alerted and was APPALLED to find it was 5-1 to leave it. Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #182
lol. what a pity. cali Oct 2013 #205
so the sun rises in the West? reddread Oct 2013 #9
Cali don't give a shit... trumad Oct 2013 #10
WOW! B Calm Oct 2013 #11
just feeding Cuccinelli's narrative joshcryer Oct 2013 #12
No. Posting facts, dear. Yes, fact. Trumad is making up cali Oct 2013 #17
Sorry, honey, your article invokes his narrative. joshcryer Oct 2013 #21
"Honey"? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #31
"Dear" "honey" "darling" same difference. joshcryer Oct 2013 #32
What makes you think you're allowed to speak to women in condescending sexual tones? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #41
Probably because Cali used the word Dear? B Calm Oct 2013 #42
And the term "cracker" is license to respond with the n-word, right? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #48
No, but I think you are getting a little carried away here! B Calm Oct 2013 #49
I've no doubt you do. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #58
Anybody that would make a big deal out of the word honey and not have B Calm Oct 2013 #61
I'm sure a lot of guys would think that. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #68
Depends on what the server called me! B Calm Oct 2013 #70
It's what she does... check her transparency Ellipsis Oct 2013 #142
I have seen her do this shit before! B Calm Oct 2013 #179
You're alleging "honey" is equlivent to the "n-word"? joshcryer Oct 2013 #56
Herm? Those are genderless terms. joshcryer Oct 2013 #44
Spoken with the ease of born privilege. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #53
I used a synonym for "dear" and you're calling privilege? joshcryer Oct 2013 #57
Your so born to privilege you don't/won't recognize it. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #65
"you're" joshcryer Oct 2013 #66
hahahaha reddread Oct 2013 #69
You got me! The thread is yours! Oh cruel fate. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #71
Much of her shtick is "honey", "sweetie", "dearie". Pick another fight, because this one ... 11 Bravo Oct 2013 #174
cali frequently uses the honey, dear, cupcake Whisp Oct 2013 #117
It does not. that's flatly untrue. cali Oct 2013 #40
Oops, 30% of the paragraphs in that article support Cuccinelli. joshcryer Oct 2013 #46
baloney. you love making stuff up. cali Oct 2013 #52
I counted. joshcryer Oct 2013 #60
post 'em. post those paragraphs that you claim are pro-Cuccianelli cali Oct 2013 #77
You've been Ackbarred Orrex Oct 2013 #114
that is a Flat Fucking LIE. I NEVER POSTED THAT STORY. I never cali Oct 2013 #13
yelp! yelp! Whisp Oct 2013 #118
Heh... BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #135
honey badger reddread Oct 2013 #20
Look Pal... trumad Oct 2013 #22
Hasn't really been a hard rule since DU3.0 joshcryer Oct 2013 #25
why not? It shouldn't be allowed. Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #183
It is against DU rules to not support a dem candidate. It is NOT against the rules cali Oct 2013 #29
Please trumad Oct 2013 #36
not at all reddread Oct 2013 #30
I gotta say, cali really got to you on this one, trumad quinnox Oct 2013 #173
It's a wiki article. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #16
yeah, and one with citations and there are thousands of news stories cali Oct 2013 #19
Denial or realpolitik? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #23
Do "these" people not want to clean-up our party? dotymed Oct 2013 #51
thank you so much, dotymed. cali Oct 2013 #55
The election is in less than a month. That's your choice: Cuccinelli or McAuliffe. FSogol Oct 2013 #78
Really? dotymed Oct 2013 #109
So, if you lived in VA, you wouldn't vote for McAulliife? FSogol Oct 2013 #111
I would probably do as I have done dotymed Oct 2013 #115
McAuliffe's greed? Reminds me of the WAPO article that accussed Hilary Clinton of being FSogol Oct 2013 #116
not true Enrique Oct 2013 #26
I agree. Posts get alerted and shut down for personal slights but tearing a Democratic... Walk away Oct 2013 #103
I'm asking myself the same question. n/t FSogol Oct 2013 #105
Totally agree. DontTreadOnMe Oct 2013 #185
I agree. BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #130
Quit whining and alert! Define "bash"! Nt Logical Oct 2013 #171
It is pointless to alert on anything less that someone calling someone else Hilter. FSogol Oct 2013 #172
Eat much sour grapes???? OldRedneck Oct 2013 #14
and YOU recall fucking wrong. I NEVER POSTED a thing about that story cali Oct 2013 #33
Did any of this change Terry McAuliffe poll numbers littlewolf Oct 2013 #15
no, and it's unlikely too. I'm glad of that. As I've said, I'll take a sleazy corrupt, corporate cali Oct 2013 #18
That's a sorry menu if those are the only 2 choices to order from. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #27
It is indeed. And also sorry are all these lies being peddled that I endorsed cali Oct 2013 #34
With demeaning sexist undertones. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #43
Reminds me of the Louisiana governor election... BlueCheese Oct 2013 #163
As a Virginian countingbluecars Oct 2013 #24
+1 B Calm Oct 2013 #28
Also a Virginian and in complete agreement with you Neurotica Oct 2013 #35
+ bigtree Oct 2013 #37
I understand your point and I would have if people weren't pushing the flat out lie cali Oct 2013 #38
True, nothing you post here will make a difference sammytko Oct 2013 #45
other than defending oneself from lies and attacks that occur here reddread Oct 2013 #50
I know I'm a bit of a martinet when it comes to being honest cali Oct 2013 #59
So....your online reputation is more important than keeping VA from getting a right-wing governor. jeff47 Oct 2013 #120
I doubt very much that cali's posts will end up getting the Republican elected. BlueCheese Oct 2013 #164
For every Cali posting, there's several dozen Calis talking with their friends and neighbors. jeff47 Oct 2013 #165
I most heartily concur. What we need to do is turn out in large numbers and WCLinolVir Oct 2013 #86
+1000 Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #101
how many of your fellow Virginians get their opinions from DU? frylock Oct 2013 #156
As a Virginia Dem and local committee member, I think we need to acknowledge facts. leveymg Oct 2013 #47
thanks so much, leverymg. cali Oct 2013 #64
Better Believe It! MannyGoldstein Oct 2013 #54
evidently, facts are inconvenient for some people and some don't give a shit cali Oct 2013 #62
Did you even click on the link? B Calm Oct 2013 #63
the link to the story I posted? Yes. read the whole piece. cali Oct 2013 #73
Was Terry McAuliffe found guilty in a court of law for fraud? B Calm Oct 2013 #67
did I ever make that claim? and my but you set the bar about as low as cali Oct 2013 #72
In this country we are Innocent until proven guilty! B Calm Oct 2013 #74
and free from unreasonable search and seizure reddread Oct 2013 #76
bzzzt. at least learn something. No, that is NOT true cali Oct 2013 #82
I take it, then, that you have/will Union Scribe Oct 2013 #191
If you can charge Terry McAuliffe for a crime, why don't you go for it! B Calm Oct 2013 #202
You keep claiming he is corrupt. That's language straight from Cuccinelli's campaign. FSogol Oct 2013 #80
I hate to break this to you but that's language that's been applied to him for close cali Oct 2013 #88
I was wrong about one thing when I posted that the day after TM lost the nomination to Deeds leveymg Oct 2013 #100
definitely not, did anyone say such a thing? reddread Oct 2013 #75
You keep posting a link to the source story that AP pulled. FSogol Oct 2013 #81
cali, bashing a Dem nominee weeks before an election is a nono scheming daemons Oct 2013 #79
+1 B Calm Oct 2013 #83
I've said I support him over Cuccianelli and I do, but I will not fucking whitewash him. cali Oct 2013 #84
your "facts" can wait until after the election scheming daemons Oct 2013 #85
Exactly! B Calm Oct 2013 #87
those aren't "facts" and they aren't "mine". They fucking FACTS cali Oct 2013 #91
And I'm sorry you couldn't support our candidate in PA Walk away Oct 2013 #106
which candidate is that? reddread Oct 2013 #113
Sorry, Va. Walk away Oct 2013 #138
Well, aren't we self-righteous............. Beacool Oct 2013 #214
Remember when people use to call him Terry McAwful? ProSense Oct 2013 #90
I never posted that AP story. I sure as shit did not endorse it. Ever. cali Oct 2013 #93
You seemed ProSense Oct 2013 #94
False. In that thread I post repeatedly that the story was bullshit, pro cali Oct 2013 #99
That wasn't a smear and this isn't either, PS. leveymg Oct 2013 #102
VA-Gov: Howard Dean Fundraises For Terry McAuliffe (D) ProSense Oct 2013 #92
Uh, I've said I support him, pro. which you know. cali Oct 2013 #97
I am not into whitewashing, but I think a more constructive post WCLinolVir Oct 2013 #95
Sometimes you hold your nose and vote. This is one of those times. (nt) ehrnst Oct 2013 #96
This is at the top of that Wikipedia article, which is being disputed, Cali: MineralMan Oct 2013 #98
I'm sorry, MM, but anyone paying attention to McAuliffe over the past cali Oct 2013 #104
I do not care for McAuliffe, but I refuse to post disparaging articles about him BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #139
MM. If you can dispute any facts presented in the OP, please do so. Otherwise, you too know how leveymg Oct 2013 #107
Well done, cali Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #108
LOL trumad Oct 2013 #112
why? I've made it quite clear what I think of Cuccianelli. cali Oct 2013 #121
I just thought it would be convenient to have all their financial histories in one thread Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #133
Incredibly helpful post, right before the election. nt geek tragedy Oct 2013 #110
+1 B Calm Oct 2013 #119
Don't you think the wider DU readership needs to know what we in VA are already painfully aware of? leveymg Oct 2013 #122
I am forced to come to the conclusion that partisanship trumps reason and facts cali Oct 2013 #123
Partisanship is not irrational in zero-sum elections. geek tragedy Oct 2013 #125
what a crock. I've said repeatedly that I support Terry M, but I will NOT cali Oct 2013 #129
Calling McAuliffe corrupt and sleazy, echoing the Cucincelli's attacks on him, is not rational geek tragedy Oct 2013 #131
I don't see any intent to echochamber Cuc's campaign here. leveymg Oct 2013 #143
intent is irrelevant--that which reinforces the Cuch's message reinforces it regardless geek tragedy Oct 2013 #144
That we're having this argument is an indication of how leveymg Oct 2013 #146
False equivalence. Mcauliffe is not perfect, but he's sane and holds the right position geek tragedy Oct 2013 #147
The issue isn't positions. Nobody here is arguing there is any equivalence there. leveymg Oct 2013 #148
then blast his opponants with Ops. trumad Oct 2013 #134
The campaign on both sides has been almost entirely negative. The concern is that if we go any leveymg Oct 2013 #145
learn how to spell, tru. cali Oct 2013 #162
awww the old spelling comeback trumad Oct 2013 #166
Partisanship is healthy and necessary in politics. Hiding your head in the sand isn't. leveymg Oct 2013 #126
They need to know there's an election within weeks where a far-right wing homophobe geek tragedy Oct 2013 #124
I'm forced to believe some on DU smear Innocent people that B Calm Oct 2013 #132
so, by your way of "thinking", George W bush is pure as the driven snow cali Oct 2013 #161
If you can charge Terry McAuliffe for crime, why don't you go for it! B Calm Oct 2013 #177
wow. that was impressively lame. cali Oct 2013 #206
and so was your orignal post! B Calm Oct 2013 #207
bwahahahaha. cali Oct 2013 #208
Your original post was to try to depress the turnout B Calm Oct 2013 #209
no, it wasn't. not even close. but it's cute of you to fake cali Oct 2013 #210
Is he from Chicago? Or ever been to Chicago? If so, he's OK and better than Repubs. AnotherMcIntosh Oct 2013 #128
Is this an attempt to surpress VA turnout? You do realize Medicaid expansion is on the line, right? ecstatic Oct 2013 #136
Good point. Another potential unintended consequence of this OP. stevenleser Oct 2013 #151
and kittens reddread Oct 2013 #152
Really? Link? nt stevenleser Oct 2013 #153
fixed n/t reddread Oct 2013 #154
how will this supress VA turnout? how many Virginians are even aware of DU's existance? frylock Oct 2013 #157
Trickle down effect. Believe it or not, all kinds of people come to DU for talking ecstatic Oct 2013 #160
so the prevailing progressive view here does not reflect the Reality-Based Real World Realists.. frylock Oct 2013 #167
This message was self-deleted by its author quinnox Oct 2013 #169
I think it may well even be more convoluted and inane than that but that seems to be the gist. TheKentuckian Oct 2013 #176
it's a whole lot of eating and keeping of cake.. frylock Oct 2013 #186
more truth in this one thread reddread Oct 2013 #188
This is an extremely ill-considered OP stevenleser Oct 2013 #141
A whole thread of whining about, in essence, telling the truth about our awful corporate candidate. TheKentuckian Oct 2013 #149
exactly reddread Oct 2013 #150
thanks. wish I found it more hilarious than frustratring cali Oct 2013 #155
Sadly, I'm still a few years' planning away from starting my run in VA Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #184
Mcauliffe is sleeze Egnever Oct 2013 #158
Well, the two choices in VA are McAuliffe and Cuccinelli. Beacool Oct 2013 #159
I don't know much about Mcauliff, except he used to be on political talk shows quinnox Oct 2013 #168
Oh. Such purity. Nothing in the world is pure white. nt bluestate10 Oct 2013 #170
bzzt. please note that I said McAuliffe should be supported cali Oct 2013 #203
.. no allegation of wrongdoing by McAuliffe or that he or other investors knew of efforts to defraud Tx4obama Oct 2013 #175
self delete this pile of garbage Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #178
+1 B Calm Oct 2013 #180
did you just find out McAuliffe was Running for Governor ? JI7 Oct 2013 #181
Post removed Post removed Oct 2013 #189
That is BS. ALL dems in Virginia need to go and VOTE for the DEMOCRAT! Tx4obama Oct 2013 #190
And it's hilarious that it's the same people Union Scribe Oct 2013 #192
lol, so true quinnox Oct 2013 #194
if Terry loses is it forced vaginal ultrsounds for women who choose to have abortions? Liberal_in_LA Oct 2013 #193
and where the fuck do I say he should lose?? To the contrary cali Oct 2013 #204
ok ok Liberal_in_LA Oct 2013 #211
what i don't get is why didn't people have concerns early on before he became the Nominee JI7 Oct 2013 #196
they did, but not about YESTERDAYS NEWS reddread Oct 2013 #198
I never liked this sleazeball.. 2banon Oct 2013 #197
eh color me jaded steve2470 Oct 2013 #200
that may be - but proper decorum requires that we cover this up or at least downplay it until after Douglas Carpenter Oct 2013 #201
He's a total scumbag. Adenoid_Hynkel Oct 2013 #212
Hey I have an idea Cali_Democrat Oct 2013 #213
Cali, you must be a Republican! Rosa Luxemburg Oct 2013 #215
I just looked at some polls, and Mcauliffe is winning. So all the angst quinnox Oct 2013 #216
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yes, Terry McAuliffe has ...