Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
25. How Obamacare Helped Paul, A Homeless California Man, Finally Get Insurance
Fri Oct 11, 2013, 11:06 AM
Oct 2013
How Obamacare Helped Paul, A Homeless California Man, Finally Get Insurance

By Scott Keyes

Hope isn’t an insurance policy.

This is the lesson that Paul, a 55-year-old San Francisco man with thin, wispy hair reminiscent of a benevolent mad scientist, learned three years ago when his closest friend died from cancer. She was diagnosed in early 2010. Four months later, lacking insurance and any means to pay for care, she died.

<...>

Things weren’t always bad for Paul, who preferred not to divulge his last name or have his photo taken. He had worked for a big technology company for years. When layoffs came following the dot-com bubble, he took a buyout and used the money to start his own IT consulting business. It was “thriving,” he explained. That is, until demand dried up after the 2008 market crash. His business went under and he was soon evicted...He has been homeless for nearly five years, sleeping in his car and trying every day to find work. It’s been 12 years since he had health insurance. For Paul, health care has meant aspiring, an annual flu shot, and confidence he won’t get sick.

<...>

On Monday, Paul showed up at Project Homeless Connect, a services fair for homeless people held near the Castro district of San Francisco, unsure of what he’d find...The problem is that, even though he had no health care, no home, and no assets, he still wasn’t eligible for California’s Medicaid program, Medi-Cal. That’s because for years, only people who were elderly, disabled, or had dependent children were eligible for Medi-Cal. Childless adults like Paul were excluded from the system.

That is, until Obamacare.

One of the most important reforms in the Affordable Care Act is the expansion of Medicaid to cover anyone with an income at or below 133 percent of the federal poverty level...I ran into Paul after his consultation with SF PATH, a federally-funded insurance program that has served low-income San Franciscans, but will automatically roll over all its enrollees into Medi-Cal beginning on January 1, 2014.

- more -

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/10/11/2761931/homeless-obamacare/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

man, do I ever despise that teaparty asswipe guv of Maine cali Oct 2013 #1
They're ALL asswipes, cali. Not just the Maine guy. calimary Oct 2013 #51
Thanks. dgibby Oct 2013 #2
It shows ProSense Oct 2013 #3
K&R One of the good things this will do. n/t Egalitarian Thug Oct 2013 #4
I'm not sure about this chart. Ron Green Oct 2013 #5
Is that after the expansion? ProSense Oct 2013 #11
I agree that the post and chart make it confusing Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #55
The chart reflects 2013 eligbility levels, and ProSense Oct 2013 #56
wordpress.com ? Why not try the official Government website here seveneyes Oct 2013 #39
It makes me want to cry to see how well some states treat their citizens, bunnies Oct 2013 #6
The expansion solved that problem, which evidently upset Republicans. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #13
Evidently. bunnies Oct 2013 #14
two-state solution Doctor_J Oct 2013 #7
There are no "red" states. kentauros Oct 2013 #27
Wisconsin was kinder before the expansion treestar Oct 2013 #8
Before the asshole Scott Walker. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #19
Thanks for this post. mia Oct 2013 #9
You're welcome. ProSense Oct 2013 #12
Top 10 states where eligibility is highest are also on top 10 healthiest states in US. JaneyVee Oct 2013 #10
Arkansas accepted the expansion. ProSense Oct 2013 #20
Again, cruelty is exactly the sweetspot they are aiming for. gulliver Oct 2013 #15
Maybe. After all ProSense Oct 2013 #16
Good post ProSense, thanks. Scuba Oct 2013 #17
You're welcome. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #18
Kick! n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #21
Kick! Looks like Kasich is feeling the heat ProSense Oct 2013 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author DireStrike Oct 2013 #23
You can bet MSMITH33156 Oct 2013 #24
How Obamacare Helped Paul, A Homeless California Man, Finally Get Insurance ProSense Oct 2013 #25
Confused about the chart BumRushDaShow Oct 2013 #26
Corbett dropped his opposition to the expansion, and ProSense Oct 2013 #28
Here is PA's Democratic State Assembly leader's take BumRushDaShow Oct 2013 #49
Thanks. Good to know he's being pressured. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #50
Disgusting, their complete disregard for humanity. Do not tell me the GOP Jefferson23 Oct 2013 #29
Yup! n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #30
I got snookered by that chart a week or two ago Monthly vs. Annually... whttevrr Oct 2013 #31
The real deal whttevrr Oct 2013 #32
You're showing the eligibility effective 2014, and it's still zero for adults ProSense Oct 2013 #36
Your chart is for family of 3, and is wrong. whttevrr Oct 2013 #38
I think you're confusing children's eligibility with parents ProSense Oct 2013 #46
No, it isn't. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #33
Math does not have a political bias... whttevrr Oct 2013 #35
The OP chart is 2013 eligibility. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #37
For a family of three, not an individual adult. whttevrr Oct 2013 #40
It's for 2013. Check out the FPL levels here ProSense Oct 2013 #42
That chart appears to mix yearly/monthly incomes. Here is an accurate PDF from medicaid.gov seveneyes Oct 2013 #34
No, here is the chart ProSense Oct 2013 #41
That does not change the fact that the chart in OP is wrong. whttevrr Oct 2013 #43
No, here is Alabama's eligiblity for a family of three in 2013: ProSense Oct 2013 #44
Here's is a chart with income levels: ProSense Oct 2013 #45
Your chart in the OP uses a family of 3, not individuals (n/t) and done. Go on w/your bad self. whttevrr Oct 2013 #47
The chart at the link in the previous comment is for a family of three. ProSense Oct 2013 #48
OT, but I am astounded that Oregon is so stingy. Laelth Oct 2013 #52
Maybe it had something to do with this: ProSense Oct 2013 #53
Very interesting. Thanks, Pro. n/t Laelth Oct 2013 #54
You're welcome. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #57
$4,500 per month? You were not clear. LukeFL Oct 2013 #58
Here: ProSense Oct 2013 #59
Koch-Backed Group Targets GOP Lawmaker Open To Obamacare Medicaid Expansion ProSense Oct 2013 #60
Pro-Life Groups In Ohio Sue To Block 300,000 Low-Income People From Gaining Health Coverage ProSense Oct 2013 #61
K & R Scurrilous Oct 2013 #62
kick Liberal_in_LA Oct 2013 #63
Thanks. ProSense Oct 2013 #64
Kick! n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Cruelty of Republican...»Reply #25