General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)couldn't deny coverage to children based upon a preexisting condition?
It contained a loophole. Insurance companies could stop covering children on their own policies altogether: healthy or sick.
So my healthy son, and many others like him, were forced on to temporary (11 months and 29 days and then you had to pay to "re-up" again) "insurance" policies that were high deductible ($15k) policies with no preventative care. I couldn't cover him under a policy because the high risk pools will only cover the "high risk patient" with no dependents (and that was unreachable for me financially anyway) That's what ACA "did" for us before the entire law kicked in. And it was a negative. No way to spin it. Now? It has been amazingly beneficial to my family. I have hope that I will survive past the age of 45. Now? We need to work to cover all. Instead of snorting at them and deriding them.
This is a start. But a lot of good, hardworking people are still going to suffer here.