Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Yes, Terry McAuliffe has a sleazy as hell financial history. [View all]B Calm
(28,762 posts)207. and so was your orignal post!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
216 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yeah, just found out. So, I'll change that to growing our majority in STATES, then. eom
BlueCaliDem
Oct 2013
#140
We can't be putting purity tests on politicians. If you do that, Republicans will continue to win
BlueCaliDem
Oct 2013
#199
Once apon a time on DU you couldn't bash Democratic candidates right before an election.
FSogol
Oct 2013
#6
What makes you think you're allowed to speak to women in condescending sexual tones?
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2013
#41
Much of her shtick is "honey", "sweetie", "dearie". Pick another fight, because this one ...
11 Bravo
Oct 2013
#174
It is against DU rules to not support a dem candidate. It is NOT against the rules
cali
Oct 2013
#29
The election is in less than a month. That's your choice: Cuccinelli or McAuliffe.
FSogol
Oct 2013
#78
McAuliffe's greed? Reminds me of the WAPO article that accussed Hilary Clinton of being
FSogol
Oct 2013
#116
I agree. Posts get alerted and shut down for personal slights but tearing a Democratic...
Walk away
Oct 2013
#103
It is pointless to alert on anything less that someone calling someone else Hilter.
FSogol
Oct 2013
#172
no, and it's unlikely too. I'm glad of that. As I've said, I'll take a sleazy corrupt, corporate
cali
Oct 2013
#18
I understand your point and I would have if people weren't pushing the flat out lie
cali
Oct 2013
#38
So....your online reputation is more important than keeping VA from getting a right-wing governor.
jeff47
Oct 2013
#120
I doubt very much that cali's posts will end up getting the Republican elected.
BlueCheese
Oct 2013
#164
For every Cali posting, there's several dozen Calis talking with their friends and neighbors.
jeff47
Oct 2013
#165
As a Virginia Dem and local committee member, I think we need to acknowledge facts.
leveymg
Oct 2013
#47
You keep claiming he is corrupt. That's language straight from Cuccinelli's campaign.
FSogol
Oct 2013
#80
I hate to break this to you but that's language that's been applied to him for close
cali
Oct 2013
#88
I was wrong about one thing when I posted that the day after TM lost the nomination to Deeds
leveymg
Oct 2013
#100
I've said I support him over Cuccianelli and I do, but I will not fucking whitewash him.
cali
Oct 2013
#84
This is at the top of that Wikipedia article, which is being disputed, Cali:
MineralMan
Oct 2013
#98
I do not care for McAuliffe, but I refuse to post disparaging articles about him
BlueCaliDem
Oct 2013
#139
MM. If you can dispute any facts presented in the OP, please do so. Otherwise, you too know how
leveymg
Oct 2013
#107
I just thought it would be convenient to have all their financial histories in one thread
Blue_Tires
Oct 2013
#133
Don't you think the wider DU readership needs to know what we in VA are already painfully aware of?
leveymg
Oct 2013
#122
Calling McAuliffe corrupt and sleazy, echoing the Cucincelli's attacks on him, is not rational
geek tragedy
Oct 2013
#131
intent is irrelevant--that which reinforces the Cuch's message reinforces it regardless
geek tragedy
Oct 2013
#144
False equivalence. Mcauliffe is not perfect, but he's sane and holds the right position
geek tragedy
Oct 2013
#147
The issue isn't positions. Nobody here is arguing there is any equivalence there.
leveymg
Oct 2013
#148
The campaign on both sides has been almost entirely negative. The concern is that if we go any
leveymg
Oct 2013
#145
Partisanship is healthy and necessary in politics. Hiding your head in the sand isn't.
leveymg
Oct 2013
#126
They need to know there's an election within weeks where a far-right wing homophobe
geek tragedy
Oct 2013
#124
Is he from Chicago? Or ever been to Chicago? If so, he's OK and better than Repubs.
AnotherMcIntosh
Oct 2013
#128
Is this an attempt to surpress VA turnout? You do realize Medicaid expansion is on the line, right?
ecstatic
Oct 2013
#136
how will this supress VA turnout? how many Virginians are even aware of DU's existance?
frylock
Oct 2013
#157
Trickle down effect. Believe it or not, all kinds of people come to DU for talking
ecstatic
Oct 2013
#160
so the prevailing progressive view here does not reflect the Reality-Based Real World Realists..
frylock
Oct 2013
#167
I think it may well even be more convoluted and inane than that but that seems to be the gist.
TheKentuckian
Oct 2013
#176
A whole thread of whining about, in essence, telling the truth about our awful corporate candidate.
TheKentuckian
Oct 2013
#149
I don't know much about Mcauliff, except he used to be on political talk shows
quinnox
Oct 2013
#168
.. no allegation of wrongdoing by McAuliffe or that he or other investors knew of efforts to defraud
Tx4obama
Oct 2013
#175
if Terry loses is it forced vaginal ultrsounds for women who choose to have abortions?
Liberal_in_LA
Oct 2013
#193
what i don't get is why didn't people have concerns early on before he became the Nominee
JI7
Oct 2013
#196
that may be - but proper decorum requires that we cover this up or at least downplay it until after
Douglas Carpenter
Oct 2013
#201