Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
25. What's racist about my OP?
Sun Oct 13, 2013, 11:21 PM
Oct 2013

Pointing out the fact that the constitution was written and signed by all white men is racist against white men?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Civic religion. That's really the long and short of it. NuclearDem Oct 2013 #1
Never. It's a living document. ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #2
It's nearly impossible to amend it now Cali_Democrat Oct 2013 #3
Amendment process has not changed. MicaelS Oct 2013 #7
There have been five Constitutional amendments in my lifetime. hack89 Oct 2013 #48
Sorry, disagree with you here, Ranchemp. Oct 2013 #4
I don't think anybody's going to kick down your door and drag you away for posting that OP. rrneck Oct 2013 #5
The Constitution is no match for Wall Street. Rex Oct 2013 #6
Good point Cali_Democrat Oct 2013 #14
No. Its the polititians and courts Wall St owns... HooptieWagon Oct 2013 #38
What might you suggest replacing it with, and how would you get it accomplished?? madinmaryland Oct 2013 #8
+1 onenote Oct 2013 #10
Don't replace it all. Change the Legislature to a unicameral body like Nebraska where it's worked hooverville29 Oct 2013 #17
Good idea Cali_Democrat Oct 2013 #18
Or if we're going to radically alter Congress, keep both bodies NuclearDem Oct 2013 #23
Anything is better than the dysfunction we have now. GreenPartyVoter Oct 2013 #28
1861. Nt. Warren Stupidity Oct 2013 #9
A huge problem is the big disparity in state size taught_me_patience Oct 2013 #11
Split California into North and South California; combine North and South Dakota, etc. FarCenter Oct 2013 #16
Do that and we're a lot less potent Democratic force n/t melody Oct 2013 #19
It would benefit the Democrats -- the margin in the senate would increase by 2 FarCenter Oct 2013 #45
The whole fight isn't about Congress melody Oct 2013 #46
The great failure in this country is education. DURHAM D Oct 2013 #12
I think it's basically good but needs a couple modifications treestar Oct 2013 #13
If I am not mistaken, some of the framers Downwinder Oct 2013 #15
You think a parliamentary system would be better? Azathoth Oct 2013 #20
Of course we should not allow the kind f gerrymandering we see today Cali_Democrat Oct 2013 #21
In Florida, a few Dem incumbents aided and abetted... HooptieWagon Oct 2013 #41
Racist drivel with, thankfully, no recs. Skip Intro Oct 2013 #22
What's racist about my OP? Cali_Democrat Oct 2013 #25
Oh please. Skip Intro Oct 2013 #30
It was written by older white men. NuclearDem Oct 2013 #32
They were white men.... Cali_Democrat Oct 2013 #33
Wow. Skip Intro Oct 2013 #36
Because those old white men didn't give women the vote or treat African Americans as actual people? NuclearDem Oct 2013 #37
No they didn't. It was the times they were living in. SomethingFishy Oct 2013 #60
How did I use race and gender in a derogatory way? Cali_Democrat Oct 2013 #44
It was written by white racist slave owners. morningfog Oct 2013 #54
how many white people were kept in slavery because of the constitution? CreekDog Oct 2013 #65
How on earth did you construe that as racist? NuclearDem Oct 2013 #27
Cali is trashing the Constitution, and uses race, age and gender Skip Intro Oct 2013 #31
And you're absolutely proving the point CD was making. NuclearDem Oct 2013 #34
Notice how he goes after me for mentioning the founding fathers were white men Cali_Democrat Oct 2013 #35
The lack of inclusion goes to the fallibility of the document. morningfog Oct 2013 #56
Actual racist often only see the reverse racism morningfog Oct 2013 #55
Reverse racism doesn't exist... Decaffeinated Oct 2013 #61
Yes, I know that. That is very much my point. morningfog Oct 2013 #62
So it's OK to scream "racist" when people point out that the Constitution was written by white men? ProSense Oct 2013 #39
It's not the constitution that's the problem. It's the idiots misinterpreting it. Initech Oct 2013 #24
Might I suggest you offer something to replace it with? Savannahmann Oct 2013 #26
Too many people treat it with religious relevance Nevernose Oct 2013 #29
I am awestruck that the Constitution is still going strong after 200+ years. Nye Bevan Oct 2013 #40
I don't think the Jamaal510 Oct 2013 #42
There is nothing wrong with the Constitution ProSense Oct 2013 #43
A couple of things. NCTraveler Oct 2013 #47
The problem is how vague and loosely construed it is. NuclearDem Oct 2013 #49
Agree almost 100% with your post. NCTraveler Oct 2013 #52
Well, when I mention radical, it's more in the context of different from how we do things NuclearDem Oct 2013 #57
I'd say, now, probably Spider Jerusalem Oct 2013 #50
When you are no longer allowed to ask that question. Puzzledtraveller Oct 2013 #51
It isn't the document as much as it is the ability to change interpretations rustydog Oct 2013 #53
Don't think the Constitution is really the problem here Proud Liberal Dem Oct 2013 #58
"Don't it always seem to go, that you don't know what you've got Waiting For Everyman Oct 2013 #59
The Constitution isn't the failure. The men who misuse it and constantly refer to it... ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #63
Given the overall condition of western "civilization" at the time the Constitution was ratified, Zorra Oct 2013 #64
It's not the Constitution that's the problem, it's our lawmakers ecstatic Oct 2013 #66
Parliamentary systems are usually less stable than ours. JVS Oct 2013 #67
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»At what point can we say ...»Reply #25