Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
6. For the lower income families or persons, ACA limits cost-sharing
Mon Oct 14, 2013, 10:44 AM
Oct 2013

Those who get significant cost-sharing help will have their responsibility limited to 6% and 13%. Those people will get access to most health care services as needed. However the third tier of cost-sharing help still leaves the patients on the hook for 27% of costs, and cost-sharing help ends at 250% of FPL, leaving patients on the hook for their entire deductible and generally a 30% copay after that until the OOP maximum is reached.

The reality is that many people won't be able to get anything but emergency care, because the deductibles and copayments for ACA plans are quite high. ACA doesn't provide access to treatment unless you are low income. It does provide wellness exams, but if they find anything wrong treatment is not covered until you have met your deductible and can come up with the copayment. So you can get a free colonoscopy or mammogram or wellness exam, but if your doctor decides you need treatment for a tumor or a nuclear stress test, many will have to come up with thousands of dollars to get that.

For many, ACA plans will be the "shitty insurance" everyone thought they were getting away from.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not legal in emergency rooms, pipoman Oct 2013 #1
It is entirely legal in ERs Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #7
This is incorrect. cbayer Oct 2013 #15
You are correct.. SomethingFishy Oct 2013 #17
Emergency departments tend to understand this law very well. cbayer Oct 2013 #18
Years ago, my brother enlightenment Oct 2013 #20
This is a good thing Trillo Oct 2013 #2
It's the opposite here. progressoid Oct 2013 #3
I'm all for up-front pricing but Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #13
Kaiser:.. when my husband filled his first prescription with them, they charged $110.00 SoCalDem Oct 2013 #4
Well this certainly is interesting. Autumn Oct 2013 #5
For the lower income families or persons, ACA limits cost-sharing Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #6
Yo_Mama, that's interesting info on the cost-sharing. enlightenment Oct 2013 #8
The best article is probably Kaiser Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #16
Interesting. enlightenment Oct 2013 #19
Well, the good part is that if you get ill and your income falls off Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #22
Yes. enlightenment Oct 2013 #24
Obama was correct then when he called it insurance finance reform. Autumn Oct 2013 #9
it wasn't meant to be affordable for the poor. KG Oct 2013 #21
Well there was hope. Autumn Oct 2013 #23
This is nothing new nobodyspecial Oct 2013 #10
The reason I can't go to a doctor/ER is because they always demand payment up front. ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #11
kick xchrom Oct 2013 #12
Same ol pay your premiums and get denied coverage until you go bankrupt from deductables. L0oniX Oct 2013 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Patients Pay Before Seein...»Reply #6