Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
16. The best article is probably Kaiser
Mon Oct 14, 2013, 01:43 PM
Oct 2013
http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/features/insuring-your-health/2013/070913-michelle-andrews-on-cost-sharing-subsidies.aspx
A family of four whose income is between 100 and 150 percent of the federal poverty level ($23,550 to $35,325) will be responsible for paying 6 percent of covered expenses out-of-pocket compared with the 30 percent that a family not getting subsidized coverage would owe in a silver plan. A family with an income between 150 and 200 percent of the poverty level ($35,325 to $47,100) will be responsible for 13 percent of expenses, and one with an income between 200 and 250 percent of the poverty level will be responsible for 27 percent ($47,100 to $58,875).

In addition, people who earn 250 percent of the federal poverty level or less will also have their maximum out-of-pocket spending capped at lower levels than will be the case for others who buy plans on the exchange. In 2014, the out-of-pocket limits for most plans will be $6,350 for an individual and $12,700 for a family. But people who qualify for cost-sharing subsidies will see their maximum out-of-pocket spending capped at $2,250 or $4,500 for single or family coverage, respectively, if their incomes are less than 200 percent of the poverty level, and $5,200 or $10,400 if their incomes are between 200 and 250 percent of poverty.


This helps lower-income families a great deal, but leaves middle income families with the need for cash up front.

Note that cost-sharing reductions are for silver plans.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not legal in emergency rooms, pipoman Oct 2013 #1
It is entirely legal in ERs Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #7
This is incorrect. cbayer Oct 2013 #15
You are correct.. SomethingFishy Oct 2013 #17
Emergency departments tend to understand this law very well. cbayer Oct 2013 #18
Years ago, my brother enlightenment Oct 2013 #20
This is a good thing Trillo Oct 2013 #2
It's the opposite here. progressoid Oct 2013 #3
I'm all for up-front pricing but Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #13
Kaiser:.. when my husband filled his first prescription with them, they charged $110.00 SoCalDem Oct 2013 #4
Well this certainly is interesting. Autumn Oct 2013 #5
For the lower income families or persons, ACA limits cost-sharing Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #6
Yo_Mama, that's interesting info on the cost-sharing. enlightenment Oct 2013 #8
The best article is probably Kaiser Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #16
Interesting. enlightenment Oct 2013 #19
Well, the good part is that if you get ill and your income falls off Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #22
Yes. enlightenment Oct 2013 #24
Obama was correct then when he called it insurance finance reform. Autumn Oct 2013 #9
it wasn't meant to be affordable for the poor. KG Oct 2013 #21
Well there was hope. Autumn Oct 2013 #23
This is nothing new nobodyspecial Oct 2013 #10
The reason I can't go to a doctor/ER is because they always demand payment up front. ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #11
kick xchrom Oct 2013 #12
Same ol pay your premiums and get denied coverage until you go bankrupt from deductables. L0oniX Oct 2013 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Patients Pay Before Seein...»Reply #16