Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
22. Well, the good part is that if you get ill and your income falls off
Mon Oct 14, 2013, 02:31 PM
Oct 2013

you will still get insurance and have reduced copays. That takes care of one of the problems in the system currently, in which ill people can't afford to keep paying their insurance premiums because they're out of work!

But there really is going to be a problem for many who literally have insurance but can't come up with the cash for payment. For those people, it is going to be hard to gain access to all but emergency care.

I think the doughnut hole is the best description. Higher income people will almost all be forced into the catastrophic plans, but they will have some reasonable chance of coming up with the cash to get treated. Plus, it is relatively easier to save for a high income person.

A family of 3 wouldn't have any cost-sharing reduction with income of 50K, and having to come up with $3,000 or $4,000 for medical care would be difficult for many and impossible for quite a few. If it's a kid with a medical problem they will treat the kid and chase the parents later, but if it is a parent with a medical problem, unless they can borrow or have a local charity who can kick in they are up the creek without a paddle.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not legal in emergency rooms, pipoman Oct 2013 #1
It is entirely legal in ERs Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #7
This is incorrect. cbayer Oct 2013 #15
You are correct.. SomethingFishy Oct 2013 #17
Emergency departments tend to understand this law very well. cbayer Oct 2013 #18
Years ago, my brother enlightenment Oct 2013 #20
This is a good thing Trillo Oct 2013 #2
It's the opposite here. progressoid Oct 2013 #3
I'm all for up-front pricing but Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #13
Kaiser:.. when my husband filled his first prescription with them, they charged $110.00 SoCalDem Oct 2013 #4
Well this certainly is interesting. Autumn Oct 2013 #5
For the lower income families or persons, ACA limits cost-sharing Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #6
Yo_Mama, that's interesting info on the cost-sharing. enlightenment Oct 2013 #8
The best article is probably Kaiser Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #16
Interesting. enlightenment Oct 2013 #19
Well, the good part is that if you get ill and your income falls off Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #22
Yes. enlightenment Oct 2013 #24
Obama was correct then when he called it insurance finance reform. Autumn Oct 2013 #9
it wasn't meant to be affordable for the poor. KG Oct 2013 #21
Well there was hope. Autumn Oct 2013 #23
This is nothing new nobodyspecial Oct 2013 #10
The reason I can't go to a doctor/ER is because they always demand payment up front. ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #11
kick xchrom Oct 2013 #12
Same ol pay your premiums and get denied coverage until you go bankrupt from deductables. L0oniX Oct 2013 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Patients Pay Before Seein...»Reply #22