General Discussion

ProSense

(116,464 posts)

44. No, here is Alabama's eligiblity for a family of three in 2013:

Tue Oct 15, 2013, 12:52 PM

Oct 2013

Medicaid Income Limits for 2013

SOBRA Medicaid (Children 6 to 19 years of age) – 100% of federal poverty level (effective
02/2013):
Income after deductions cannot exceed $958 per month for a family of 1
Income after deductions cannot exceed $1,293 per month for a family of 2
Income after deductions cannot exceed $1,628 per month for a family of 3
Income after deductions cannot exceed $1,963 per month for a family of 4

Medicaid for Low Income Families:

Income after deductions cannot exceed $111 per month for a family of 1
Income after deductions cannot exceed $137 per month for a family of 2
Income after deductions cannot exceed $164 per month for a family of 3
Income after deductions cannot exceed $194 per month for a family of 4

http://medicaid.alabama.gov/documents/3.0_Apply/3.2_Qualifying_Medicaid/3.2_Medicaid_Income_Limits_2013_2-1-13.pdf

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

65 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Cruelty of Republican States in One Chart [View all] ProSense Oct 2013 OP

man, do I ever despise that teaparty asswipe guv of Maine cali Oct 2013 #1

They're ALL asswipes, cali. Not just the Maine guy. calimary Oct 2013 #51

Thanks. dgibby Oct 2013 #2

It shows ProSense Oct 2013 #3

K&R One of the good things this will do. n/t Egalitarian Thug Oct 2013 #4

I'm not sure about this chart. Ron Green Oct 2013 #5

Is that after the expansion? ProSense Oct 2013 #11

I agree that the post and chart make it confusing Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #55

The chart reflects 2013 eligbility levels, and ProSense Oct 2013 #56

wordpress.com ? Why not try the official Government website here seveneyes Oct 2013 #39

It makes me want to cry to see how well some states treat their citizens, bunnies Oct 2013 #6

The expansion solved that problem, which evidently upset Republicans. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #13

Evidently. bunnies Oct 2013 #14

two-state solution Doctor_J Oct 2013 #7

There are no "red" states. kentauros Oct 2013 #27

Wisconsin was kinder before the expansion treestar Oct 2013 #8

Before the asshole Scott Walker. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #19

Thanks for this post. mia Oct 2013 #9

You're welcome. ProSense Oct 2013 #12

Top 10 states where eligibility is highest are also on top 10 healthiest states in US. JaneyVee Oct 2013 #10

Arkansas accepted the expansion. ProSense Oct 2013 #20

Again, cruelty is exactly the sweetspot they are aiming for. gulliver Oct 2013 #15

Maybe. After all ProSense Oct 2013 #16

Good post ProSense, thanks. Scuba Oct 2013 #17

You're welcome. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #18

Kick! n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #21

Kick! Looks like Kasich is feeling the heat ProSense Oct 2013 #22

This message was self-deleted by its author DireStrike Oct 2013 #23

You can bet MSMITH33156 Oct 2013 #24

How Obamacare Helped Paul, A Homeless California Man, Finally Get Insurance ProSense Oct 2013 #25

Confused about the chart BumRushDaShow Oct 2013 #26

Corbett dropped his opposition to the expansion, and ProSense Oct 2013 #28

Here is PA's Democratic State Assembly leader's take BumRushDaShow Oct 2013 #49

Thanks. Good to know he's being pressured. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #50

Disgusting, their complete disregard for humanity. Do not tell me the GOP Jefferson23 Oct 2013 #29

Yup! n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #30

I got snookered by that chart a week or two ago Monthly vs. Annually... whttevrr Oct 2013 #31

The real deal whttevrr Oct 2013 #32

You're showing the eligibility effective 2014, and it's still zero for adults ProSense Oct 2013 #36

Your chart is for family of 3, and is wrong. whttevrr Oct 2013 #38

I think you're confusing children's eligibility with parents ProSense Oct 2013 #46

No, it isn't. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #33

Math does not have a political bias... whttevrr Oct 2013 #35

The OP chart is 2013 eligibility. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #37

For a family of three, not an individual adult. whttevrr Oct 2013 #40

It's for 2013. Check out the FPL levels here ProSense Oct 2013 #42

That chart appears to mix yearly/monthly incomes. Here is an accurate PDF from medicaid.gov seveneyes Oct 2013 #34

No, here is the chart ProSense Oct 2013 #41

That does not change the fact that the chart in OP is wrong. whttevrr Oct 2013 #43

No, here is Alabama's eligiblity for a family of three in 2013: ProSense Oct 2013 #44

Here's is a chart with income levels: ProSense Oct 2013 #45

Your chart in the OP uses a family of 3, not individuals (n/t) and done. Go on w/your bad self. whttevrr Oct 2013 #47

The chart at the link in the previous comment is for a family of three. ProSense Oct 2013 #48

OT, but I am astounded that Oregon is so stingy. Laelth Oct 2013 #52

Maybe it had something to do with this: ProSense Oct 2013 #53

Very interesting. Thanks, Pro. n/t Laelth Oct 2013 #54

You're welcome. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #57

$4,500 per month? You were not clear. LukeFL Oct 2013 #58

Here: ProSense Oct 2013 #59

Koch-Backed Group Targets GOP Lawmaker Open To Obamacare Medicaid Expansion ProSense Oct 2013 #60

Pro-Life Groups In Ohio Sue To Block 300,000 Low-Income People From Gaining Health Coverage ProSense Oct 2013 #61

K & R Scurrilous Oct 2013 #62

kick Liberal_in_LA Oct 2013 #63

Thanks. ProSense Oct 2013 #64

Kick! n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #65