Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Miss Me Yet? [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)80. Wouldn't have happened.
First, the Senate would not have convicted - it takes 67 votes to convict, and the Republicans would never have voted for it. Even if there was video of W announcing that he was going to lie the country into a war while he was beating a bag of kittens and having sex with an underage male prostitute, the Senate would not have convicted.
Second, Clinton's impeachment means that it would have been treated as "payback". Thus there would be no serious attention paid to the charges.
The betrayal is not investigating W after he left office. The crimes do not disappear when he left office.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Progressive legislation and saving from meltdown took precedence over satisfaction.
freshwest
Oct 2013
#35
Those who call for impeachment when they have majority, lose big in the next election, doesn't
freshwest
Oct 2013
#77
This president has more ammunition up his sleeve than the GOP idiocracy seems to realize.
IrishAyes
Oct 2013
#23
May Speaker Pelosi, in her next go-around, not hesitate to put impeachment on the
indepat
Oct 2013
#72