Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: US Congress passes authoritarian anti-protest law [View all]G_j
(40,569 posts)2. here is the bill
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:h.r.347:
Details, Amendments
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY AS OF:
2/6/2012--Passed Senate amended. (There are 4 other summaries)
(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the Senate on November 17, 2011. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011 - Amends the federal criminal code to revise the prohibition against entering restricted federal buildings or grounds to impose criminal penalties on anyone who knowingly enters any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority. Defines "restricted buildings or grounds" as a posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of: (1) the White House or its grounds or the Vice President's official residence or its grounds, (2) a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting, or (3) a building or grounds so restricted due to a special event of national significance.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAJOR ACTIONS:
1/19/2011 Introduced in House
2/11/2011 Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 112-9.
2/28/2011 Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 399 - 3 (Roll no. 149).
11/17/2011 Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Leahy with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
2/6/2012 Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
2/27/2012 Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 388 - 3 (Roll no. 73).
3/1/2012 Presented to President.
..more.. information at link..
Details, Amendments
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY AS OF:
2/6/2012--Passed Senate amended. (There are 4 other summaries)
(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the Senate on November 17, 2011. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011 - Amends the federal criminal code to revise the prohibition against entering restricted federal buildings or grounds to impose criminal penalties on anyone who knowingly enters any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority. Defines "restricted buildings or grounds" as a posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area of: (1) the White House or its grounds or the Vice President's official residence or its grounds, (2) a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting, or (3) a building or grounds so restricted due to a special event of national significance.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAJOR ACTIONS:
1/19/2011 Introduced in House
2/11/2011 Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 112-9.
2/28/2011 Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 399 - 3 (Roll no. 149).
11/17/2011 Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Leahy with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
2/6/2012 Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
2/27/2012 Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 388 - 3 (Roll no. 73).
3/1/2012 Presented to President.
..more.. information at link..
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It already applied to all previous G8 summits, because the previous law was in effect
jeff47
Mar 2012
#42
The reason Democrats, including Kucinich, support this is that it doesn't do what you say.
onenote
Mar 2012
#21
So the answer to my question is that you think teabaggers should have unimpeded access to President
onenote
Mar 2012
#34
What do you think an appropriate sentence for crashing a White House event should be?
onenote
Mar 2012
#12
So you'd be fine with a bunch of teabaggers breaking into the residential portion of the WH
onenote
Mar 2012
#22
Read the damn bill. You are wrong. Because the authors of these links are lying.
jeff47
Mar 2012
#37
Well since the law in that regard is the same as it was a week ago, a month ago, and a decade ago
onenote
Mar 2012
#23
"Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech . . . or the right of the people
libmom74
Mar 2012
#36
An authoritarian government could/would designate a major national strike along the lines
Uncle Joe
Mar 2012
#66
Yes and money used to mean money and persons used to mean people, but the law
Uncle Joe
Mar 2012
#67
What is the legal definition of "special event of national significance"? n/t
Uncle Joe
Mar 2012
#74
Here is some helpful background info on special events of national significance (aka NSSEs)
onenote
Mar 2012
#81
From what I can tell there are only two people that determine what that definition means.
Uncle Joe
Mar 2012
#82
What the hell is wrong with the senate? I understand how it got through the house but the senate?
jwirr
Mar 2012
#77
Probably because the Senate thinks that protecting the WH and VP residence from unauthorized entry
onenote
Mar 2012
#79
That does make a difference. I would not want protesters doing either of those things.
jwirr
Mar 2012
#85