Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The president said it again: Our problem is with Social Security and Medicare. [View all]jsr
(7,712 posts)24. Here is a link to what he just said:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/transcript-president-obamas-oct-17-remarks-on-shutdown-deal/2013/10/17/3eff02b6-3738-11e3-8a0e-4e2cf80831fc_story.html
There's a lot of noise out there, and the pressure from the extremes affect how lot of members of Congress see the day-to-day work that's supposed to be done here...
Let me be specific about three places where I believe we can make progress right now.
First, in the coming days and weeks, we should sit down and pursue a balanced approach to a responsible budget, a budget that grows our economy faster and shrinks our long-term deficits further. At the beginning of this year, that's what both Democrats and Republicans committed to doing. Senate passed a budget. House passed a budget. They were supposed to come together and negotiate. And had one side not decided to pursue a strategy of brinksmanship, each side could have gotten together and figured out how do we shape a budget that provides certainty to businesses and people who rely on government, provides certainty to investors and our economy, and we'd be growing faster right now.
Now, the good news is the legislation I signed yesterday now requires Congress to do exactly that, what it could have been doing all along. And we shouldn't approach this process of creating a budget as an ideological exercise, just cutting for the sake of cutting. The issue's not growth versus fiscal responsibility. We need both. We need a budget that deals with the issues that most Americans are focused on, creating more good jobs that pay better wages.
And remember, the deficit is getting smaller, not bigger. It's going down faster than it has in the last 50 years. The challenge that we have right now are not short-term deficits; it's the long-term obligations that we have around things like Medicare and Social Security.
There's a lot of noise out there, and the pressure from the extremes affect how lot of members of Congress see the day-to-day work that's supposed to be done here...
Let me be specific about three places where I believe we can make progress right now.
First, in the coming days and weeks, we should sit down and pursue a balanced approach to a responsible budget, a budget that grows our economy faster and shrinks our long-term deficits further. At the beginning of this year, that's what both Democrats and Republicans committed to doing. Senate passed a budget. House passed a budget. They were supposed to come together and negotiate. And had one side not decided to pursue a strategy of brinksmanship, each side could have gotten together and figured out how do we shape a budget that provides certainty to businesses and people who rely on government, provides certainty to investors and our economy, and we'd be growing faster right now.
Now, the good news is the legislation I signed yesterday now requires Congress to do exactly that, what it could have been doing all along. And we shouldn't approach this process of creating a budget as an ideological exercise, just cutting for the sake of cutting. The issue's not growth versus fiscal responsibility. We need both. We need a budget that deals with the issues that most Americans are focused on, creating more good jobs that pay better wages.
And remember, the deficit is getting smaller, not bigger. It's going down faster than it has in the last 50 years. The challenge that we have right now are not short-term deficits; it's the long-term obligations that we have around things like Medicare and Social Security.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The president said it again: Our problem is with Social Security and Medicare. [View all]
jsr
Oct 2013
OP
The 'raiding' is only on paper but you're right, it should never be used for ANYTHING else.
randome
Oct 2013
#15
No he is not. SS has enough revenue to cover its obligations, thanks to the American Working Class
sabrina 1
Oct 2013
#34
He doesn't know what he is talking about, only repeating what his puppetmaster Peter J. Peterson
duffyduff
Oct 2013
#97
No he shouldn't. That would be a betrayal of the rich and the trickle-down theory.
AnotherMcIntosh
Oct 2013
#133
Pssst, not everything is about 'political capital'. In fact to a vast majority
sabrina 1
Oct 2013
#140
Great, it was expected. So here's the obligation they have around 'things' like Medicare and SS'.
sabrina 1
Oct 2013
#39
For sure there are challenges with long-term obligations regarding medicare and ss.
DCBob
Oct 2013
#42
and nothing about the 1% and corporate tax dodgers shortchanging the country ...
Myrina
Oct 2013
#30
SS is one of the strongest Fiscal programs we have right now. All it needs to ensure it remains
sabrina 1
Oct 2013
#41
Well if you are planning on giving away more jobs then the tax revenue will continue to drop.
L0oniX
Oct 2013
#9
It's an excellent speech, meant to unite. Getting pissed defeats the point. nt
BluegrassStateBlues
Oct 2013
#10
Not reallly...He chastised "extremists in both parties"....Dissed Bloggers and Media.
KoKo
Oct 2013
#60
Rather, pissing off your audience misses the point. I suppose now we're going to
Egalitarian Thug
Oct 2013
#88
I cannot stand this constant attack from the Tea Party AND from WITHIN, aka, the neo-liberals
merbex
Oct 2013
#13
I agree...why wouldn't a Democratic President stand with the Dems who Elected Him!
KoKo
Oct 2013
#83
And they don't want to have to pay back the trillions they borrowed from the SS Fund.
sabrina 1
Oct 2013
#43
What nonsense. We don't need 'exemptions'. Every person who paid into the fund did so the same way
sabrina 1
Oct 2013
#46
As a Democrat I assure you I have educated myself fully on this issue, a cornerstone of Democratic
sabrina 1
Oct 2013
#56
Center for American Progress and Center for Budget and Policy Priorities are linked
pottedplant
Oct 2013
#63
I'll take Chained-CPI along with reduced Medicare cost sharing, programs that help the young, etc.
Hoyt
Oct 2013
#84
Did I say that? Did I not say earlier "as long as there are protection . . . . ."?
Hoyt
Oct 2013
#92
Paul Ryan says the same thing - the Republicans want to strengthen these programs
Samantha
Oct 2013
#87
Both the President and Nancy Pelosi have suggested Chained CPI as a mechanism for
Enthusiast
Oct 2013
#125
He's like a prize fighter that holds a palooka up in a clinch so that the round won't end.
AnotherMcIntosh
Oct 2013
#138
Maybe he has too many Republican advisors. Too many in his cabinet and elsewhere.
AnotherMcIntosh
Oct 2013
#137
The federal government can't go broke. Obama is repeating Cato Institute, Peterson lies
duffyduff
Oct 2013
#100
Our "problem" is with the private health insurance industry telling us what to do.
Leopolds Ghost
Oct 2013
#55
Here's an idea - eliminate the cap on SS tax, and put a bit more of FICA towards Medicare
muriel_volestrangler
Oct 2013
#75
time to open the Overton window to the left again: harm SSI and Medicare and I support impeachment
NuttyFluffers
Oct 2013
#76
I wouldn't want to try to repeat that while intoxicated, but you're absolutely right. n/t
winter is coming
Oct 2013
#132
We have to give lying criminal repukes credibility to continue the left/right paradigm fraud
Corruption Inc
Oct 2013
#139