Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Hillary Clinton, Welcome to the White House [View all]
National Journal:In the innermost sanctum of Clintonland, it is difficult to imagine that Hillary and Bill, two of the savviest politicians in the country, are not pinching themselves to make sure that it's all real. Perhaps they're dancing a jig together, or knocking back shots and howling at the moon out of sheer, giddy joy at their good luck. (OK, Hillary's not howling, but Bill might be.) Or maybe they are just quietly kvelling over the latest turn of events.
Because the trend lines are unmistakable, and they're looking better all the time: If she wants to run in 2016, Hillary Rodham Clinton could have the easiest walk into the White House of any candidate in either party since, well, one has to go back a very long way. Maybe to Reagan in '84. LBJ in '64, or Eisenhower in '52, or even FDR in 1932, 1936 and 1940. The presidency is looking like it's hers to lose, more than ever.
The reasons are becoming more obvious with each passing crisis of Republicanism, but are even starker now in the wake of the GOP's embarrassing implosion over the shutdown and debt-ceiling fight. This is an opposition party in such a state of extreme dysfunction that talk of a third-party split in 2016 is almost irrelevant. Why would you need a third-party split to winas Bill did, recall, cheating George H.W. Bush out of a second term in 1992 thanks to the Ross Perot candidacywhen the base and establishment of the GOP are no longer on speaking terms?
...snip...
The demographic numbers tell a grim tale for any potential GOP candidate at the same time as they look like manna from electoral heaven for Hillary. The Republican Party, still in the grip of tea-party extremism, is more and more becoming the party of disaffected and aging white voters. Even many Republican strategists are conceding that no GOP presidential nominee can win that way. But the party is not building itself a bigger tent fast enough: Strapped down by House extremists who can't think beyond the demands of their scarlet-red districts, or beyond the next two years, the GOP is not likely to embrace immigration reform despite Marco Rubio's efforts, thus continuing to alienate the burgeoning Hispanic vote that so doomed Romney. As my colleague Ron Brownstein wrote recently: "Absent big GOP gains with minorities, [Clinton] could win, even comfortably, just by maintaining Obama's showing with whites [But] the first 2016 polling instead has generally shown her trimming Obama's deficit among whites both nationally and in key states."
Because the trend lines are unmistakable, and they're looking better all the time: If she wants to run in 2016, Hillary Rodham Clinton could have the easiest walk into the White House of any candidate in either party since, well, one has to go back a very long way. Maybe to Reagan in '84. LBJ in '64, or Eisenhower in '52, or even FDR in 1932, 1936 and 1940. The presidency is looking like it's hers to lose, more than ever.
The reasons are becoming more obvious with each passing crisis of Republicanism, but are even starker now in the wake of the GOP's embarrassing implosion over the shutdown and debt-ceiling fight. This is an opposition party in such a state of extreme dysfunction that talk of a third-party split in 2016 is almost irrelevant. Why would you need a third-party split to winas Bill did, recall, cheating George H.W. Bush out of a second term in 1992 thanks to the Ross Perot candidacywhen the base and establishment of the GOP are no longer on speaking terms?
...snip...
The demographic numbers tell a grim tale for any potential GOP candidate at the same time as they look like manna from electoral heaven for Hillary. The Republican Party, still in the grip of tea-party extremism, is more and more becoming the party of disaffected and aging white voters. Even many Republican strategists are conceding that no GOP presidential nominee can win that way. But the party is not building itself a bigger tent fast enough: Strapped down by House extremists who can't think beyond the demands of their scarlet-red districts, or beyond the next two years, the GOP is not likely to embrace immigration reform despite Marco Rubio's efforts, thus continuing to alienate the burgeoning Hispanic vote that so doomed Romney. As my colleague Ron Brownstein wrote recently: "Absent big GOP gains with minorities, [Clinton] could win, even comfortably, just by maintaining Obama's showing with whites [But] the first 2016 polling instead has generally shown her trimming Obama's deficit among whites both nationally and in key states."
Now that we've gotten that Party Unity thing out of the way, I guess we can return to the Hillary bashing?
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'll vote for her in the General Election, assuming she wins primary....
Agnosticsherbet
Oct 2013
#1
Sadly, we've seen that a fresh Senator does not know how to handle Congress
question everything
Oct 2013
#27
He got his signature program passed despite the fact that many purple/red state Democratic
stevenleser
Oct 2013
#30
Many people who "would have voted for her" couldn't resist voting for someone else?
winter is coming
Oct 2013
#56
*Today* Virginia purged around 40,000 voters, and I doubt they were republican voters.
denbot
Oct 2013
#29
Unless of course, one sincerely believes that the proposed solution is little more than the problem
LanternWaste
Oct 2013
#18
People who say if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem...
Comrade Grumpy
Oct 2013
#19
Folks "jumping the gun" thinking DU Rules to support Candidate are now enforced...
KoKo
Oct 2013
#33
People that are looking for ideologically pure candidates are damn fools.
BluegrassStateBlues
Oct 2013
#45