Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Interesting discussion with a co-worker about "Nanny State" policies. [View all]NRaleighLiberal
(61,868 posts)32. I agree - but it is a slippery slope - smoking impacts others directly (via smoke)
unhealthy eating impacts us due to increase health costs. I don't know the answer...but in all of these and many other cases that cross political lines, the dialog around the possibilities has no end....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Interesting discussion with a co-worker about "Nanny State" policies. [View all]
IdaBriggs
Oct 2013
OP
It's easy to talk a big "personal responsibility" game and "teach you kids to not be dumb"
Blue_Tires
Oct 2013
#1
It is a really tricky topic that clearly crosses political camps - and it is really complex.
NRaleighLiberal
Oct 2013
#2
This was brought up by both of us, and I made a comment about "young organ donors."
IdaBriggs
Oct 2013
#10
I was talking about the "wider bars on cribs" that had resulted in baby deaths.
IdaBriggs
Oct 2013
#19
I have no problem with that reasoning as I have no problem with robbery being illegal
Bandit
Oct 2013
#18
Well, to me it's kind of like the idiots who let their dogs ride in the back of their trucks in Tx.
hamsterjill
Oct 2013
#11
Is it "paternalistic" (as in "I am in charge!") or "maternal" (as in "please be safe!")?
IdaBriggs
Oct 2013
#23
I think the basic philosophy is: people should be free to do anything that doesn't impact others.
Make7
Oct 2013
#21
I agree - but it is a slippery slope - smoking impacts others directly (via smoke)
NRaleighLiberal
Oct 2013
#32