Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
26. The system is hopelessly rigged and I don;t see it changing in MY lifetime
Fri Oct 18, 2013, 08:56 PM
Oct 2013

And it;s why we never progress.. we just keep re-wrapping the same old stuff we have been fighting about for 40+ years...pretty depressing

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

More ageism on DU pintobean Oct 2013 #1
You better believe it. duffyduff Oct 2013 #31
how about a mandatory minimum IQ level....seems most of the Tea gang revel in their ignorance.... NRaleighLiberal Oct 2013 #2
I think that would be far more useful. nt valerief Oct 2013 #4
Maybe some psychological/personality testing Siwsan Oct 2013 #5
Definitely! Well, and I think there should be some type of mental stability qualification, I really RKP5637 Oct 2013 #6
Or at least an 8th grade civics test! arcane1 Oct 2013 #33
Didn't IQ testing get debunked a while ago? nt Jamaal510 Oct 2013 #40
I'd like to see them be able to solve a simple logic problem. hobbit709 Oct 2013 #49
word. mahina Oct 2013 #52
Agree. I have an old fart who is 82 also. DURHAM D Oct 2013 #3
How about we ask voters every two years, eh? jberryhill Oct 2013 #7
Works great IF all/most of the voters have more than 5 working brain cells SoCalDem Oct 2013 #10
I don't see how age limits will solve gerrymandering and groups Incitatus Oct 2013 #11
term limits would help SoCalDem Oct 2013 #15
There are some very good politicians serve several terms Incitatus Oct 2013 #23
The system is hopelessly rigged and I don;t see it changing in MY lifetime SoCalDem Oct 2013 #26
Term limits exist, it is called voting. Maybe you should keep some people from voting, but bluestate10 Oct 2013 #28
GOP is perfecting that as we type.. no worries SoCalDem Oct 2013 #30
term limits have been a disaster for California, Legislatures can be complicated JI7 Oct 2013 #29
Term limits will not end lobbying. Gormy Cuss Oct 2013 #32
+ struggle4progress Oct 2013 #35
Terms limits has turned the MO state legislature into lobbyists training ground loyalsister Oct 2013 #39
Because it's worked so well in California Hekate Oct 2013 #44
We need to be able to recall the bastards emsimon33 Oct 2013 #8
Older people who did great things: The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2013 #9
true, but they were also from an era that appreciated age=wisdom thinking SoCalDem Oct 2013 #13
McCain hasn't gotten worse with age; he's always been like that. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2013 #16
People can be useful and NOT be a seantor/congressperson/supreme court justice SoCalDem Oct 2013 #21
Considering the current quality of our educational system The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2013 #27
Rachel Carson died at age 56. FarCenter Oct 2013 #19
Accomplishments of the elderly: The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2013 #24
Reminds me of Bill Maher's "Weekend At Bernie's government" arcane1 Oct 2013 #12
That's just silly blogslut Oct 2013 #14
that's discrimination Niceguy1 Oct 2013 #17
Bernie Sanders is 72 Samantha Oct 2013 #18
You stated an opinion, but gave no justification for your position. bluestate10 Oct 2013 #20
I Don't agree. mia Oct 2013 #22
Maybe what we need is a minimum age Turbineguy Oct 2013 #25
Constitution, Article I, Section 2, Paragraph ii: "No Person shall be a Representative who shall not struggle4progress Oct 2013 #41
Hmmm.... Thanks. Obviously.... Turbineguy Oct 2013 #46
Well, I was grumpy about these age limits as a kid: "I can't be President until I'm 35 !?!!? WTF !!! struggle4progress Oct 2013 #55
Robert C. Byrd was in the Senate at 93 and was sharp as tack. If others doc03 Oct 2013 #34
"There is always a well-known solution to every human problem -- neat, plausible, and wrong" struggle4progress Oct 2013 #36
Hear, hear, struggle4progress! CBHagman Oct 2013 #37
Yeesh MFrohike Oct 2013 #38
A certain method to disempower minorities and get rid of our most powerful and experienced members. Coyotl Oct 2013 #42
It's called an "election", and the term limits are 2 years, 4 years, and 6 years at a time Hekate Oct 2013 #43
Like Dan Inouye was? Nope. My senior senators were the best. dkf Oct 2013 #45
Cruz just proved how regressive and how much damage Skidmore Oct 2013 #47
I don't think you can necessarily do an age limit davidpdx Oct 2013 #48
Hastert went from a school teacher's salary to millionaire... HereSince1628 Oct 2013 #50
We do not. mahina Oct 2013 #51
This would change nothing whatsoever. JackRiddler Oct 2013 #53
Why? You've proposed a solution without laying out the problem. nt Codeine Oct 2013 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We need a mandatory retir...»Reply #26