Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
38. The beauty of it is that those that ARE supportive of those positions...will gladly accept that
Sat Oct 19, 2013, 07:30 PM
Oct 2013

They would take that moniker and wear it with pride....not realizing that in doing so...they have just called themselves a proven enemy of the U.S. Government!

They proudly call themselves all sorts of names "Red Neck" as an example...The truly rabid members of the Tea Party would gladly identify as Confederates. Consider the backdrop of the fact they didn't stop even when it became common knowledge that the very term they chose to define themselves was the name of a sex act they would all find objectionable... (Teabagger). They are so blatant with their racism now....I think they wouldn't bat an eye to be called a Confederate.

and I also think this is an excellent way to finally break them from the Republican Party. Moderate Republicans would shy away from that name...the Teabaggers would not....but while the Teaparty consider themselves part of the Republican Establishment....the Republican Establishment would not be so welcoming of a group of people gladly calling themselves that.

And Neo-Confederates works too....either would be fine.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

#Rename-the-Tea-Party had a number of lovely suggestions Warpy Oct 2013 #1
Good one!!! GoCubsGo Oct 2013 #8
Just call them what they are Confederates... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #2
I like that suggestion... ljm2002 Oct 2013 #20
This is the correct answer. SolutionisSolidarity Oct 2013 #31
The beauty of it is that those that ARE supportive of those positions...will gladly accept that VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #38
I like it! baggers is retired in favor of the Stalinists kydo Oct 2013 #3
Stalinbagger hootinholler Oct 2013 #19
sounds like a food kydo Oct 2013 #22
Why don't we just label them appropriately as "republicans"? TBF Oct 2013 #4
Ding ding we have a winner although I go for malaise Oct 2013 #21
ReTHUGS, rePUGS, repugnant -- it all kind of TBF Oct 2013 #27
+1,000 malaise Oct 2013 #29
Very apt analogy. jsr Oct 2013 #5
I'm sorry if I'm being obtuse (it's not deliberately) Cirque du So-What Oct 2013 #6
its more of as a bagger would say "commie" that gets under their skin kydo Oct 2013 #10
Yeah, it's unfortunate comparison to Hitler has been so overused... Barack_America Oct 2013 #11
I agree that the Nazi/Hitler comparison is overused Cirque du So-What Oct 2013 #14
In addition to the Stalin->Koch->Tea Party connection, it exposes RW hypocrisy. Faryn Balyncd Oct 2013 #13
"Neo-Confederate wing" would be more appropriate. GoCubsGo Oct 2013 #7
Tea Baggers. They *hate* it and it's the TRUTH <<<---- they hate THAT even more. nt LaydeeBug Oct 2013 #9
No need to slander Trotsky by comparing him to these people. QC Oct 2013 #12
Thank you QC....... socialist_n_TN Oct 2013 #23
:) nt TBF Oct 2013 #25
Yeah, no kidding. NuclearDem Oct 2013 #30
Call them the Traitor Party. backscatter712 Oct 2013 #15
The Tyrrany Party -- because they are a bunch of dinosaurs who attempt tyrannical rule. Coyotl Oct 2013 #16
Well, they keep trying to pull the Stalinist trick of erasing inconvenient history... JHB Oct 2013 #17
More seriously, just call them what they are: Radicals JHB Oct 2013 #18
I would go with Seditionist, Anarchist, or Traitorous wing. nt Fla Dem Oct 2013 #24
The Hezbollah Wing sounds better. nt Codeine Oct 2013 #26
That has a nice ring to it. Faryn Balyncd Oct 2013 #33
New Birchers grasswire Oct 2013 #28
Are they calling for a proletariat revolution in either one country or internationally? NuclearDem Oct 2013 #32
You have a valid point. Faryn Balyncd Oct 2013 #34
Yeah, and I do see what you're aiming at. NuclearDem Oct 2013 #35
I would prefer to address them as "the Saddam Hussein wing of the GOP"..... lastlib Oct 2013 #36
I never call them the "tea party".. that's orwellian bullshit Cha Oct 2013 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Linguistics: Should we re...»Reply #38