Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
103. ABSOLUTELY! I held High Hopes for MICHELLE to be "Eleanor Roosevelt"
Mon Oct 21, 2013, 07:25 PM
Oct 2013

And there was some of her that COULD HAVE BEEN!

Without an ELEANOR....and SOCIALIST VOICES....Obama is Left with the Left he Came in With. Which is "Center for American Progress" and Will Marshall's Clinton Group of
"Progressives for Democracy" which seems to have recently gotten a big INFUSION of FUNDING to put their "THIRD WAY/TRADE DEAL/DE-REGULATION" Propaganda out there to Flood the NETROOTS.

LEFTY DEMs...Read This and WEEP! The Doctrine of the "Progressive Policy Institute" in Cahoots with "Clinton Global Initiative" It's an Eye Opener about Democratic Policy going forward.

REAL DEMS are DEVASTATED..!

http://www.progressivepolicy.org/about/


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We thank you for your tepid support Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #1
You almost have to admire the level of relentlessly consistent negativism. 11 Bravo Oct 2013 #6
It's called dealing with reality. cali Oct 2013 #17
It can be called a lot of things, reality is not one of them krawhitham Oct 2013 #207
Also have to admire the level of relentless dissent squashing from the fanboi faction .... Myrina Oct 2013 #41
Or they see the thread at top of the page and offer their opinion Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #55
Um, progressoid Oct 2013 #67
You snarked in the plural 'we thank you'. What is that about? Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #96
Maybe he has a fabulous pink pony. n/t QC Oct 2013 #159
energizer bunny sex reddread Oct 2013 #90
+ 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #178
Why yes, yes you do. Especially this sort: cui bono Oct 2013 #195
lol Renew Deal Oct 2013 #68
FDR had 300+ in the House and 70+ in the Senate. JaneyVee Oct 2013 #85
Obama vetoes: 4. FDR vetoes: 635 nt Bonobo Oct 2013 #140
Because Republicans aren't concerned with writing legislation, only blocking it. JaneyVee Oct 2013 #144
And how many total bills have passed the 113th United States Congress? krawhitham Oct 2013 #208
FDR's vetoes of reparations for Indians... yay. joshcryer Oct 2013 #210
Have you thanked Obama for HIS tepid support? cui bono Oct 2013 #194
ahh...linking to an article from Glenn Greenwald who admits he's not objective right in his piece Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #196
So you're going to discount something that actually happened simply because GG wrote it? cui bono Oct 2013 #197
Clinton. NAFTA and Telecommunications Act of 1996. Among others. Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #198
I'm not defending Clinton. You sure like to try to change the topic, don't you? cui bono Oct 2013 #199
woops! I guess you is WRONG! but you must be used to it by now Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #200
Eliabeth Warren race wasn't a primary and the youtube clip is from 2006, when Obama was campaigning cui bono Oct 2013 #202
Better a good, principled Democratic President, than a failed Deal Maker. leveymg Oct 2013 #2
Maybe someday we will actually get that choice on our ballot. Agnosticsherbet Oct 2013 #4
Better a pragmatic progressive than a "pure" president who gets nothing passed Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #5
There's no danger of a "pure" anything in DC. Obama does need to hold to some basic principles - leveymg Oct 2013 #12
He's not a progressive. not when it comes to economics- as bernie points out. cali Oct 2013 #18
Some have redefined "progressive" as anything to the left of the TeaBagger Party. rhett o rick Oct 2013 #70
Who gets to define "progressive"? tridim Oct 2013 #102
Is this a guessing game? If you have something to say, why dont you speak out instead rhett o rick Oct 2013 #109
LOL. Difficult question huh? tridim Oct 2013 #114
The definition of a Progressive isnt "someone that makes progress." rhett o rick Oct 2013 #120
Agreed. He put Wall Street in the WH ffs. And offered up SS cuts. cui bono Oct 2013 #135
I agree that those people are progressives... tridim Oct 2013 #161
Playing word games on message boards isn't progressive. n/t cui bono Oct 2013 #134
I guess you don't want to answer either. tridim Oct 2013 #162
Why dont you try making statements instead of asking questions? Dont be afraid to rhett o rick Oct 2013 #209
"New Democrat"ic Corporatists have been purposefully misapplying the label "progressive" Dragonfli Oct 2013 #131
CIA officers brisas2k Oct 2013 #152
Hey I would take that pragmatic progressive over the pragmatic centrist we have. cui bono Oct 2013 #133
So who won? SamYeager Oct 2013 #3
The "when" may have been in question, but the "who" was a foregone conclusion. 11 Bravo Oct 2013 #9
Not even here 10 days and you got a pool going. Impressive. nt laundry_queen Oct 2013 #113
Reality is a downer. cui bono Oct 2013 #136
no way, we could do a hell of a lot better than Obama quinnox Oct 2013 #7
I wouldn't characterize FDR as "fire breathing". cali Oct 2013 #19
Really? jeff47 Oct 2013 #56
one- or ten- comments hardly weigh more than the thousands that cali Oct 2013 #74
Such as? jeff47 Oct 2013 #78
Pressure from the left MyshkinCommaPrince Oct 2013 #8
+1 Without an actual Left, there will be no FDRs leftstreet Oct 2013 #16
not to mention squashing the "do gooders" reddread Oct 2013 #91
How can there be an actual left laundry_queen Oct 2013 #115
Well, this isn't actually that liberal of a board. n/t cui bono Oct 2013 #137
Unfortunatley not. Yet according to the TOS, it is supposed to be. Dark n Stormy Knight Oct 2013 #150
DU list of exceptions disqualifies all but blue-dog democrats. brisas2k Oct 2013 #156
I disagree. The TOS excludes the most radical of the left, and there are really few of them in Dark n Stormy Knight Oct 2013 #158
I totally agree. n/t cui bono Oct 2013 #192
Yes, we need a loud left. And yet there are attempts at every level to keep that from happening. cui bono Oct 2013 #138
As I noted before, Benton D Struckcheon Oct 2013 #10
We don't need FDR so much as the House and Senate that existed when FDR was President. stevenleser Oct 2013 #11
We've had divided Gov't during most of the post-war era, yet things got done leveymg Oct 2013 #29
Things got done during this President's terms too. Just not FDR level, no one else has gotten FDR stevenleser Oct 2013 #35
We need another New Deal, and haven't gotten it under Obama. leveymg Oct 2013 #44
We wouldn't have gotten the original New Deal with this congress. stevenleser Oct 2013 #60
He did have the chance in 2009. Benton D Struckcheon Oct 2013 #76
No, he didn't. Just enough members of the Democratic Senate weren't interested. nt stevenleser Oct 2013 #95
Seems like there are ALWAYS "just enough" to ensure the agenda of the 1%, doesn't it. bvar22 Oct 2013 #188
Good info to file away for future use. Thanks! n/t cui bono Oct 2013 #193
Um. The vote needed more than just Blanche Lincoln. joshcryer Oct 2013 #213
There's a great DU game one can play on their smartphone... SidDithers Oct 2013 #215
I am familiar with this game. joshcryer Oct 2013 #216
Your reply is the classic Strawman. bvar22 Oct 2013 #219
+1 The electoral game is rigged, and the casino owners almost always win. leveymg Oct 2013 #214
As a mere technicality, he did. joshcryer Oct 2013 #212
there was also a bogeyman needed, and FDR got it. brisas2k Oct 2013 #157
im sure that would sail right throug the house arely staircase Oct 2013 #92
This reality gap some have is pretty stunning really... stevenleser Oct 2013 #105
I for one blame the GOP, too! babylonsister Oct 2013 #108
It was like 39 days when Obama had the 60 vote majority in the Senate. joshcryer Oct 2013 #211
+1 billion treestar Oct 2013 #127
FDR was criticized by the left in his day as not liberal enough, NYC Liberal Oct 2013 #13
FDR was considered a class traitor datasuspect Oct 2013 #15
Yes by reasonable people. There was a not insignificant NYC Liberal Oct 2013 #21
FDR wasn't FDR zipplewrath Oct 2013 #43
lol. FDR was reviled by the moneyed classes. cali Oct 2013 #23
Yes he was. And your point is? NYC Liberal Oct 2013 #34
No offense to Mrs. Obama, but the Prez doesn't have an outspoken radical liberal Zorra Oct 2013 #14
ABSOLUTELY! I held High Hopes for MICHELLE to be "Eleanor Roosevelt" KoKo Oct 2013 #103
On what planet would this even have been possible? The black FLOTUS... Hekate Oct 2013 #145
Yeh. We need to make a focused, sustained effort at rooting out the PPI/Third Way Zorra Oct 2013 #185
Recommend! KoKo Oct 2013 #206
Did FDR have a teabagger controlled congress? nt ecstatic Oct 2013 #20
No, FDR STARTED with an 83% progressive congress and had an avg of 70% throughout terms in office uponit7771 Oct 2013 #31
Something that is conveniently forgotten. NYC Liberal Oct 2013 #39
I love how people assume that the major difference between geek tragedy Oct 2013 #22
I'm not ignoring Congress- it's in the op in my reference to other politicians cali Oct 2013 #26
FDR couldn't have led the tea party Congress. No way. n/t pnwmom Oct 2013 #46
When FDR faced filibusters, care to guess whether he: geek tragedy Oct 2013 #53
The bully pulpit matters much less now than it once did. The name should probably be changed. stevenleser Oct 2013 #57
You're just not being very realistic. Pretty typical Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #97
Organized labor & a political left had power then leftstreet Oct 2013 #33
Southern white racists voted Democratic back then. geek tragedy Oct 2013 #54
That has nothing to do with what I said n/t leftstreet Oct 2013 #62
What. Reality doesn't matter. If President Obama was to be the equivalent of FDR, he would have bluestate10 Oct 2013 #111
Post removed Post removed Oct 2013 #24
because I don't drool with adoration? fuck that. cali Oct 2013 #36
Got it. It's not adoration, you drool with disdain. Either way, you really need to wipe your chin. 11 Bravo Oct 2013 #75
amen trumad rbrnmw Oct 2013 #51
******OBAMA NEEDS AN FDR CONGRESS!!!********* FDR had 70% progressives, Obama does NOT uponit7771 Oct 2013 #25
Then he should stop working against one zipplewrath Oct 2013 #47
Absolutely, very important point, and I'll add one. Jim Lane Oct 2013 #77
Obama is working Against an 83% dem congress!!?!?!?!? Come on people!!! uponit7771 Oct 2013 #99
Against a progressive congress zipplewrath Oct 2013 #165
You mean the congress that filibustered dem measures over 300 times is progressive?! You're saying uponit7771 Oct 2013 #168
You're projecting zipplewrath Oct 2013 #169
I don't agree with Obama preferred much more conservative democrats at all, please show proof of thi uponit7771 Oct 2013 #174
Specter and Lincoln zipplewrath Oct 2013 #180
Nonsense! Lincoln and Specter voted for all his major legislation. bornskeptic Oct 2013 #173
Can't have it both ways zipplewrath Oct 2013 #177
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ NYC_SKP Oct 2013 #94
Facts ate not appreciated in ODS diatribe threads Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #98
Obama vetoes: 4. FDR vetoes: 635 nt Bonobo Oct 2013 #141
Obama terms in office: 2. FDR terms: almost 4. Hekate Oct 2013 #146
++++ The Wielding Truth Oct 2013 #101
You are wrong, most of FDR's support came from racists from all parts of the country. Those bluestate10 Oct 2013 #112
Umm, no... progressive doesn't equal perfect now and does equal perfect then and that's what's uponit7771 Oct 2013 #123
President Obama is far superior to his critics... even the ones on the left. nt BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #27
Actually, ProSense Oct 2013 #28
yes, indeed. I'll take your propaganda over Bernie's facts. NOT. cali Oct 2013 #37
What the hell are you talking about? ProSense Oct 2013 #40
Don't destroy them with facts. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #45
But in fact Heritage applauds the President's stand on the NSA. Heritage loves rhett o rick Oct 2013 #143
An error in that zipplewrath Oct 2013 #58
"Medicare Part D can't negotiate." ProSense Oct 2013 #61
So to summarize zipplewrath Oct 2013 #79
What the hell? Medicaid is not Medicare. n/t ProSense Oct 2013 #81
And water is not dirt zipplewrath Oct 2013 #82
It's called a rebate. ProSense Oct 2013 #84
So what was wrong with my summary? nt zipplewrath Oct 2013 #166
What we need is a different House. FDR wouldn't have been able pnwmom Oct 2013 #30
+1, FDR had an 75% avg dem house throughout his term(s) uponit7771 Oct 2013 #32
A House that's willing to piss away 24 billion dollars and throw people out of work. randome Oct 2013 #38
Even opposition Houses wouldn't have pulled the shutdown debt default treestar Oct 2013 #128
And what we have now is Democratic Party unity. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #42
Send him the Congress FDR had, to balance the scales. The GOP didn't shut down the gov't then Hekate Oct 2013 #48
President Obama is good and decent man and I love him rbrnmw Oct 2013 #49
You're right--Obama is running waaaaay behind on interring Japanese Americans. Orrex Oct 2013 #50
We still have time, despair not! Puzzledtraveller Oct 2013 #52
He just needs two more terms and a World War Hekate Oct 2013 #148
Damn right. When are we going to send Americans of some national heritage MineralMan Oct 2013 #59
I find it truly amazing how a politician who was full of warts become lionized with time. bluestate10 Oct 2013 #116
These same folks will be doing the same thing with Obama in 20 years. Number23 Oct 2013 #125
+1 Couldn't have said it better Hekate Oct 2013 #147
It's hilarious that the biggest feel-good some can take away is Obama is not FDR ProSense Oct 2013 #170
+a billion bravenak Oct 2013 #176
FDR has the benefit of time. In fact, there are very few MineralMan Oct 2013 #167
Many historians believe FDR saved capitalism. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2013 #63
More than a Superman to lead us, we NEED a revival of traditional Democratic Values. bvar22 Oct 2013 #64
Well done ! Thanks for the post. russspeakeasy Oct 2013 #66
'Basic Human Rights, not commodities to be sold'. Excellent sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #69
Kudos for this great post! n/t truedelphi Oct 2013 #73
+ 1,000,000,000... And, THAT Shows You How Far To The Right We've Moved Since Those Days... WillyT Oct 2013 #104
+1 cui bono Oct 2013 #139
Any minute now you'll get flamed for calling these things "rights.' Here on a supposedly liberal Dark n Stormy Knight Oct 2013 #153
You always seem to be searching for a reason to be sad. grantcart Oct 2013 #65
Very interesting post. Old and In the Way Oct 2013 #203
"I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him." MineralMan Oct 2013 #71
Is he dead? zipplewrath Oct 2013 #83
and? you remind me of nothing so much as a slow boiled frog. cali Oct 2013 #88
frog soup reddread Oct 2013 #93
Ah, sheep's heads. I haven't seen one of those MineralMan Oct 2013 #175
The water doesnt have to come to a boil slowly if the frog is in denial. Just sayin. nm rhett o rick Oct 2013 #142
Puzzled as to why someone who has handed our economy over to the Biggest of the Bankers truedelphi Oct 2013 #72
FDR was born rich + he knew many rich were AWFUL humans. pansypoo53219 Oct 2013 #80
I guess Personal Attacks and snarky attempts to discredit the messenger... bvar22 Oct 2013 #86
thank you bvar. I won't shut up cali Oct 2013 #87
Good. I live reality. 840high Oct 2013 #124
+ 1,000,000,000... What You Said !!! - K & R !!! WillyT Oct 2013 #118
Amen! nt dflprincess Oct 2013 #121
+1 nt laundry_queen Oct 2013 #122
Wow, tough crowd! Rex Oct 2013 #89
I think Obama has been pretty amazing . . . Brigid Oct 2013 #100
Let's think on this...did FDR make the changes he made on his own or with others? vaberella Oct 2013 #106
Ahhhh, the romanticized FDR. A bit like the romanticized Reagan for the right. bluestate10 Oct 2013 #107
Want America to move towards the progressive side? Get out there and start workin on it! struggle4progress Oct 2013 #110
We need a populist prez but our corporate parties aren't primarily about the people... polichick Oct 2013 #117
FDR wasn't FDR and I was taught to idolize him, He was Joe Montana orpupilofnature57 Oct 2013 #119
We need a Democratic Congress nt treestar Oct 2013 #126
We don't need another white man in power BlueToTheBone Oct 2013 #129
Obama vetoes: 4. FDR vetoes: 635 MannyGoldstein Oct 2013 #130
FDR is dead... Jeff In Milwaukee Oct 2013 #132
Kicked and Recommended! Enthusiast Oct 2013 #149
FDR had an all-Democratic Congress. Remember that. He is only ONE branch of government. RBInMaine Oct 2013 #151
damn Cali, I bet you were the kid that told the other kids that there is no such thing as Santa Douglas Carpenter Oct 2013 #154
Nope. I was a big Santa fan even when I knew it wasn't true cali Oct 2013 #164
2009 was the opportunity. PeteSelman Oct 2013 #155
and THAT kind of opportunity comes around once in a generation. bvar22 Oct 2013 #190
I think you place too much at the feet of Obama and don't look at the other factors davidpdx Oct 2013 #160
President Obama is a decent man. He's no FDR and we sorely need an FDR aidendaniel Oct 2013 #163
welcome to DU gopiscrap Oct 2013 #172
If Americans had been demanding an FDR, our president would have become one. Orsino Oct 2013 #171
Tepid Public Support? bvar22 Oct 2013 #205
Yes, tepid public support... Orsino Oct 2013 #217
-Rev Martin Luther King Jr. bvar22 Oct 2013 #220
The strongly favorable polling hasn't yet translated... Orsino Oct 2013 #221
-Rev Martin Luther King Jr. bvar22 Oct 2013 #222
If you're wishing that the president would lead more, you're far from alone. n/t Orsino Oct 2013 #223
You only have to put up with about 3 more years of Obama. JoePhilly Oct 2013 #179
ooh, you have a crystal ball. sorry, I don't believe in your cali Oct 2013 #182
What ever happens, I predict that you'll be here to tell us why its terrible. JoePhilly Oct 2013 #183
another silly prediction from you. you seem to specialize in them joey cali Oct 2013 #189
I also tend to be right most of the time, which makes it even more fun for me. JoePhilly Oct 2013 #191
in your own mind and there it stops, joey. cali Oct 2013 #218
Internment camps. FDR had those. bravenak Oct 2013 #181
Yep. FDR turned his back on Jim Crow laws and Lynchings of Blacks in the South n/t Yavin4 Oct 2013 #186
That's why I don't understand why there are those that think Pres.Obama is lacking in comparison. bravenak Oct 2013 #187
No. Obama needs the same super majority in Congress that FDR enjoyed. stopbush Oct 2013 #184
-100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #201
No Sale. Old and In the Way Oct 2013 #204
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama is a dece...»Reply #103