Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
16. The reason for the March 31 deadline is the law provides for no penalty if you don't have
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 04:18 PM
Oct 2013

a gap of coverage of more than 3 continuous months. If you missed the March 31 deadline for that by a month you'd owe
a penalty for 4 months not the 1 month your example implies.

Complete IRS rules on the penalty (with some example calculations at the end):
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-08-30/pdf/2013-21157.pdf

H. Short Coverage Gap

The proposed regulations provide that
an individual qualifies for the short
coverage gap exemption if the
continuous period without minimum
essential coverage is less than three full
calendar months and is the first short
coverage gap in the individual’s taxable
year. Further, in determining whether a
gap in coverage qualifies as a short
coverage gap, the length of the period
without minimum essential coverage is
measured by reference to calendar
months (for example, January or
February) in conjunction with the one
day rule in § 1.5000A–1(b). Therefore, if
an individual is enrolled in and entitled
to receive benefits under a plan
identified as minimum essential
coverage for one day in a calendar
month, the month is not included in the
continuous period when applying the
short coverage gap exemption.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

But insurance companies may have estimated premiums based on a certain population buying in by Jan 1 dkf Oct 2013 #1
Cruz took one hell of a gamble NoOneMan Oct 2013 #3
If he wanted a Sarah Palin ball of fire type thing he achieved his aims. dkf Oct 2013 #8
"If they are bad they may discourage sign ups." BumRushDaShow Oct 2013 #4
No it's not against the law to not have insurance. dkf Oct 2013 #9
I have talked to about 2 dozen people at the store and walking around etc. grantcart Oct 2013 #6
Signing up isn't the end of it. dkf Oct 2013 #10
"it is reported" grantcart Oct 2013 #12
Yes, there is a huge backlog of people interested. Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #18
So? The reporting is wrong. The deadline isn't Dec. 15, no matter pnwmom Oct 2013 #11
K&R BumRushDaShow Oct 2013 #2
That's very short-sighted of them lame54 Oct 2013 #5
And you have to sign up for insurance by mid February to avoid the tax penalty... PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #7
No you have to be enrolled by March 31st. grantcart Oct 2013 #13
They announced yesterday they were changing the date for enrollment to March 31 to address the issue PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #14
There is no change, just misunderstanding the difference between applying and enrolling grantcart Oct 2013 #15
The reason for the March 31 deadline is the law provides for no penalty if you don't have PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #16
K & R Scurrilous Oct 2013 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Widespread misunderstandi...»Reply #16