General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I have a question for bicyclist about something I've been experiencing [View all]JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)a sophist. (I'm sure you're capable of looking that up yourself, so don't look for a link below.)
Most people don't like sophists, because they will say and believe any bullshit and change whatever they said for their own convenience. A sophist typically will resort to name-calling strategies. One common such strategy is to avoid anything an interlocutor actually said and instead accuse the interloctutor of actually believing something with a passion, as if this is necessarily a terrible thing. Such a strategy appeals to sophists because they so often are lame, unable to think critically, and tend to accept conventional wisdom no matter how stupid or murderous it is.
Now, back to the discussion:
I have assumed nothing about you. You have transported your own biases and assumptions, and I have pointed to these. I also do not "dislike" the website you presented, it means nothing to me. Rather: I disagreed with the absurd point of view you have promoted (whether or not through quoting that website) -- that bikers should make life easier for drivers of big metal boxes by using "less busy" roads, knowing full well that such roads do not exist, and will only exist when lanes are finally assigned to bikes everywhere, as they should be.
Thus in effect if not in intent (you know little about your own intents, that much is clear) you're saying that the bikers should just cease to exist from your view, so that you don't have to worry your beautiful mind about them.