Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
60. Apples and oranges
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 07:13 PM
Oct 2013

You can't compare individual salaries with median family costs of living. If you want to do that you have to add the overtime earned by the average BART employee to the published salaries to determine what they are actually earning per year. I've seen articles that estimate the average overtime paid to a BART worker at $15k annually. You also have to add in any income earned by spouses or other family members. Also BART employees pay less than $100 monthly for health insurance premiums for their family, which means that the employer (the taxpayer) is ponying up maybe another $500-$1000 per month. Add it all up and it's entirely possible that BART line employees are pulling down over $80k per year.

I'm not some management stooge. I was a public employee for more than 30 years from entry level gofer to department head. When I first started, back in the 60's there was kind of an unspoken agreement between "civil servants" and their employers. We all knew we were getting paid less than we could have made in the private sector, but we were compensated with job security, excellent vacation and sick leave benefits and a liberal retirement plan. Over the years I watched all that change as the unions pushed and pushed for salary parity without giving back any of the benefits. Pretty soon, park and street workers were making more than the median household income for the area, and could retire at age 60 at 90% of their salaries with a 2 to 5% COLA every year. In fact a lot of municipalities are in dire financial straits today partially due to unfunded pension liabilities (as well as loss of tax base due to the bursting of the real estate bubble of course).

The public is not stupid, particularly in a highly educated, tech heavy region like the Bay Area. Don't forget the 9 county area went for Obama by huge margins in 2012. But they aren't going to have much sympathy for transit workers making close to 6 figures and then striking because they want even more.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He's going after the Reagan votes Capt. Obvious Oct 2013 #1
If you want to get people out of their cars and on to mass transit, it has to be reliable. FarCenter Oct 2013 #2
Workers also need a living wage nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #8
Fuck that, not having the right to organize and bargain gopiscrap Oct 2013 #3
who's denying them the right to organize and bargain? brooklynite Oct 2013 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #6
Actually, strikes are largely a relic of the past. Xithras Oct 2013 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #47
As I said... Xithras Oct 2013 #50
This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #51
Well, this IS California, not Wisconsin. Xithras Oct 2013 #52
This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #53
San Diego isn't exactly a bellweather for the rest of the state. Xithras Oct 2013 #54
This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #55
pithy nonsense, there is no way at all that labor can hold payments as described TheKentuckian Oct 2013 #65
How do you bargain without leverage? How do you gain any leverage without being able to strike? Skeeter Barnes Oct 2013 #11
Public opinion and political clout brooklynite Oct 2013 #14
Yes, I would support them going on strike. Skeeter Barnes Oct 2013 #15
How would you like it if your wages and benefits were subject to the whims of public opinion? Skeeter Barnes Oct 2013 #17
"How would you like it if your wages and benefits were subject to the whims of public opinion?" Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #19
They are workers just like I am and I support them if they go on strike. Skeeter Barnes Oct 2013 #21
Many unions are prohibited from striking and they still manage to negotiate. brooklynite Oct 2013 #23
See post #13 Skeeter Barnes Oct 2013 #25
My comments were not about private sector unions. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #29
If "the people" actually set the wages, that might be a good argument. jeff47 Oct 2013 #33
I'm with you on the admin vs. teachers issue. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #40
You seem to be confusing politicians with transit workers. jeff47 Oct 2013 #41
They have been for decades... brooklynite Oct 2013 #22
Management doesn't want workers to be able to strike. Skeeter Barnes Oct 2013 #24
You do know that is a false comparison since FF have a no strike clause nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #20
I do indeed... brooklynite Oct 2013 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #30
Actually, no it wasn't brooklynite Oct 2013 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #32
Ah, the slippery slope... brooklynite Oct 2013 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #49
It boils down to what is reasonable seveneyes Oct 2013 #4
Labor is not being unreasonable to demand living wages nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #7
Of course not seveneyes Oct 2013 #9
That is a media generated meme nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #10
Thank, will put some serious analysis nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #12
A Democrat hoping to implement Scott Walkers Koch funded agenda in California. Skeeter Barnes Oct 2013 #13
We have a fair amount of union-busting DINOs out here KamaAina Oct 2013 #16
Union busting -- it's not just for asshole Republicans anymore! NuclearDem Oct 2013 #18
Nope. It's for asshole Democrats, too. FiveGoodMen Oct 2013 #35
As one who's had to put up with transit strikes in NYC,... badtoworse Oct 2013 #27
Because I really want my driver to be making minimum wage. jeff47 Oct 2013 #34
these people aren't really into looking at the big picture.. frylock Oct 2013 #38
classic reddread Oct 2013 #42
A NYC Bus Driver makes at least $30 per hour plus full benefits badtoworse Oct 2013 #43
And they got that way through magic and pixie dust. jeff47 Oct 2013 #44
That's arguable badtoworse Oct 2013 #45
He's a DINO. The right to collective bargaining and the right to strike must NOT kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #28
This is why we should not automatically be voting for anyone with a D after their name. liberal_at_heart Oct 2013 #36
I expected this thread to be about Rahm Emanuel Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #37
Jerry Brown Democrats reddread Oct 2013 #39
I still think Quan should have been a keynote speaker at the DNC Fumesucker Oct 2013 #63
I was moved by her involvement, ala Brown reddread Oct 2013 #66
Public employee unions that strike are shitting in their own food dishes tularetom Oct 2013 #56
This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #58
Apples and oranges tularetom Oct 2013 #60
This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #61
i hope he gets his ass handed to him. nt xchrom Oct 2013 #57
the bay Niceguy1 Oct 2013 #67
Give him a break he's from upper middle class Orinda and Jerry's dog walker. mulsh Oct 2013 #59
Steve Glazer has got to go. Enthusiast Oct 2013 #62
So he's following FDR's lead? joshcryer Oct 2013 #64
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Democrat who's pushing ...»Reply #60