Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Enemy of the State: How Glenn Greenwald is taking on the world, and why he'll never stop. [View all]msanthrope
(37,549 posts)12. Let's not forget he was writing racist columns, too....
And yet few problems are more pressing. Over the past several years, illegal immigrants have poured into the United States by the millions. The wave of illegals entering the country is steadily increasing. The people living in the border states of California, Texas, Arizona and New Mexico know this flow has to be drastically slowed and then halted. The situation is so dire in that region that the Democratic Governors of Arizona and New Mexico were forced to declare States of Emergency as a result of the flow of illegals into their states and the resulting, massive problems which it brings.
The parade of evils caused by illegal immigration is widely known, and it gets worse every day. In short, illegal immigration wreaks havoc economically, socially, and culturally; makes a mockery of the rule of law; and is disgraceful just on basic fairness grounds alone. Few people dispute this, and yet nothing is done.
SNIP......
But one of the most disturbing and destructive aspects of illegal immigration is that it is illegal. Indeed, that is the precise attribute which separates good immigration from bad immigration. Why should Republicans, or anyone, shy away from pointing out that illegal immigration, among its many evils, is illegal? That is just absurd. Moreover, it is precisely the fact that illegal immigrants enter the country illegally that spawns justifiable resentment, not only among large clusters of middle-of-the-road voters, but also among the very legal immigrant population about which Sanchez is so concerned. Emphasizing the "illegal" part of this problem is what Republicans need to do more of, not less.
SNIP..
The real irony here is that the problem of illegal immigration is actually one of the very few of the ever-dwindling number of issues that has the opportunity to forge common ground among factions of voters which are, these days, engaged in a ceaseless war with each other. Being worried, and outraged, about illegal immigration is not confined to the extreme precincts of conservatism. Middle-class suburban voters whose primary concerns are local and pragmatic, rather than ideological, know the danger which illegal immigration poses to their communities and to their states, and they want something done about it.
http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2005/11/gop-fights-itself-on-illegal.html
The parade of evils caused by illegal immigration is widely known, and it gets worse every day. In short, illegal immigration wreaks havoc economically, socially, and culturally; makes a mockery of the rule of law; and is disgraceful just on basic fairness grounds alone. Few people dispute this, and yet nothing is done.
SNIP......
But one of the most disturbing and destructive aspects of illegal immigration is that it is illegal. Indeed, that is the precise attribute which separates good immigration from bad immigration. Why should Republicans, or anyone, shy away from pointing out that illegal immigration, among its many evils, is illegal? That is just absurd. Moreover, it is precisely the fact that illegal immigrants enter the country illegally that spawns justifiable resentment, not only among large clusters of middle-of-the-road voters, but also among the very legal immigrant population about which Sanchez is so concerned. Emphasizing the "illegal" part of this problem is what Republicans need to do more of, not less.
SNIP..
The real irony here is that the problem of illegal immigration is actually one of the very few of the ever-dwindling number of issues that has the opportunity to forge common ground among factions of voters which are, these days, engaged in a ceaseless war with each other. Being worried, and outraged, about illegal immigration is not confined to the extreme precincts of conservatism. Middle-class suburban voters whose primary concerns are local and pragmatic, rather than ideological, know the danger which illegal immigration poses to their communities and to their states, and they want something done about it.
http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2005/11/gop-fights-itself-on-illegal.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Enemy of the State: How Glenn Greenwald is taking on the world, and why he'll never stop. [View all]
Luminous Animal
Oct 2013
OP
It's a long read but great fun and as HuffPo says,"This Glenn Greenwald Profile Is The Best One Yet"
Luminous Animal
Oct 2013
#1
Yep. And Democrats who try to demonize him a experiencing a similar glorious
Luminous Animal
Oct 2013
#43
Well, so much for loyalty to one's partner. Although with the age difference, one can hardly
msanthrope
Oct 2013
#6
Loyalty? Hahaha. My husband loves country and western. I let him drag me to 2-3 shows a year
Luminous Animal
Oct 2013
#9
Oh god, yes. Thankfully, Nickelback is not something I have to contend with.
Luminous Animal
Oct 2013
#17
Starting in 2005, he wrote a daily blog criticizing Bush and his admin. He also wrote 3 books doing
Luminous Animal
Oct 2013
#10
Yes. And he was rightly slammed for it. Funny how you forgot to post this though
Luminous Animal
Oct 2013
#16
He was on the Koch payroll, too, wasn't he? He was on a lengthy stipend from CATO, IIRC.
MADem
Oct 2013
#32
If he says he wasn't employed by Cato he is lying--and calling me "McCarthy" isn't going to change
MADem
Oct 2013
#39
Really. For how long and what was the stipend? And was Kos and Wyden paid...
Luminous Animal
Oct 2013
#40
No I don't...you're the one who started out denying it, and now you're trying to accuse me of
MADem
Oct 2013
#52
I've denied nothing. You are peddling in half truths. Yes. 16 pages of published material
Luminous Animal
Oct 2013
#53
They're "touting" the work of their "contributor" in order to raise his, and their, profile.
MADem
Oct 2013
#57
I've heard Greenwald speak several times and he's always been witty and gracious.
Luminous Animal
Oct 2013
#15
Squawk! He worked for Cato. Squawk! He worked for Cato. Squawk! He worked for Cato.
Luminous Animal
Oct 2013
#50
this just reminded me of Elaine Benes on Seinfeld in Europe with controlling
Pretzel_Warrior
Oct 2013
#48