Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
37. Joseph McCarthy is that you?
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 10:15 PM
Oct 2013
http://ggsidedocs.blogspot.com/2013/01/frequently-told-lies-ftls.html

I am not now, nor have I ever been, employed by the Cato Institute. Nor have I ever been affiliated with the Cato Institute in any way. The McCarthyite tone of the denials is appropriate given the McCarthyite nature of the lie.

In seven-plus years of political writing, I have written a grand total of twice for Cato: the first was a 2009 report on the success of drug decriminalization in Portugal, and the second was a 2010 online debate in which I argued against former Bush officials about the evils of the surveillance state.

I not only disclosed those writings but wrote about them and featured them multiple times on my blog as it happened: see here and here as but two examples. In 2008, I spoke at a Cato event on the radicalism and destructiveness of Bush/Cheney executive power theories.


That's the grand total of all the work I ever did for or with Cato in my life. The fees for those two papers and that one speech were my standard writing and speaking fees. Those payments are a miniscule, microscopic fraction of my writing and speaking income over the last 7 years. I have done no paying work of any kind with them since that online surveillance debate in 2010 (I spoke three times at Cato for free: once to debate the theme of my 2007 book on the failure of the Bush administration, and twice when I presented my paper advocating drug decriminalization).

I have done far more work for, and received far greater payments from, the ACLU, with which I consulted for two years (see here). I spoke at the Socialism Conference twice - once in 2011 and once in 2012 - and will almost certainly do so again in 2013. I'll speak or write basically anywhere where I can have my ideas heard without any constraints. Moreover, I'll work with almost anyone - the ACLU, Cato or anyone else - to end the evils of the Drug War and the Surveillance State. And I'll criticize anyone I think merits it, as I did quite harshly with the Koch Brothers in 2011: here.


The very suggestion that there is something wrong with writing for or speaking at CATO is inane and childish. The claim that it means I "worked at CATO" is just an obvious lie. If writing for or speaking at CATO makes one a right-wing CATO-employed libertarian, then say hello to the following right-wing libertarian CATO employees, all of whom have been writers for or speakers at the CATO Institute in the past:

Daily Kos founder Markos Moulitsas (Writing for CATO's Unbound: here and here);

Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden (speaking about surveillance issues at CATO in January, 2011, speaking again at CATO in July, 2012 about FISA, and favorably citing CATO);

Democratic Rep. Jared Polis (defending CATO as "a leader in fighting to end the war in Afghanistan and Iraq and helping to end the War on Drugs&quot .

the ACLU's Legislative Counsel Michelle Richardson (speaking at the CATO Institute's 2011 event on FISA);

Brown University Professor Glenn Loury (writing for CATO's Unbound);

liberal blogger and Clinton Treasury official Brad DeLong (writing for CATO's Unbound);

Harvard law Professor Lawrence Lessig (writing for CATO's Unbound);

liberal blogger and GWU Professor Henry Farrell (writing for CATO's Unbound); and

Wall Street critic and securities professor William Black (writing for CATO's Unbound).

Trying to judge someone for where they write or speak - rather than for the ideas they advocate - is about as anti-intellectual and McCarthyite as it gets. CATO has a far better record of advocacy than the mainstream Democratic Party on vital issues such as opposing the Drug War, secrecy abuses, the Surveillance State, marriage equality for LGBT citizens, anti-war activism, and reforming the excesses of America's penal state. They were attacking Bush and Cheney for power abuses (see here) and aggressive wars (see here) far earlier, and far more loudly, than most mainstream Democratic politicians

As is obvious, all sorts of liberals, progressives, and even leftists have written for or spoken at CATO. It's a think tank devoted to debate and discussion of public policy, and invites a wide range of speakers to participate.

I'm proud of all the advocacy work I've done against the evils of the Drug War and surveillance abuses -- whether it's at the ACLU, CATO, the Socialism Conference or anywhere else. That's why I write openly about all of that work. But the claim that I've ever worked at CATO or was in any way affiliated with them is just an outright lie.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's a long read but great fun and as HuffPo says,"This Glenn Greenwald Profile Is The Best One Yet" Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #1
He cares about the issues Democrats claim to, and certainly did sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #42
Yep. And Democrats who try to demonize him a experiencing a similar glorious Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #43
For once in my life I agree wholeheartedly with Greenwald: Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #2
Greenwald isn't taking on the world, just the US government. geek tragedy Oct 2013 #3
Jeezus...I threw up a little at that. Nickleback? nt msanthrope Oct 2013 #4
"That was all David. I got nowhere near that." Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #5
Well, so much for loyalty to one's partner. Although with the age difference, one can hardly msanthrope Oct 2013 #6
Loyalty? Hahaha. My husband loves country and western. I let him drag me to 2-3 shows a year Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #9
But would you throw your hubby under the Nickelback bus? nt msanthrope Oct 2013 #13
Oh god, yes. Thankfully, Nickelback is not something I have to contend with. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #17
And he'll stop if Rand Paul becomes Prez Cali_Democrat Oct 2013 #22
He takes on as he always has, Bush/Cheney policies. I can't imagine sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #44
Constant invasion is extremely radical dreamnightwind Oct 2013 #7
Seems Greenwald is a little late to the party brush Oct 2013 #8
Starting in 2005, he wrote a daily blog criticizing Bush and his admin. He also wrote 3 books doing Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #10
Let's not forget he was writing racist columns, too.... msanthrope Oct 2013 #12
Yes. And he was rightly slammed for it. Funny how you forgot to post this though Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #16
He was on the Koch payroll, too, wasn't he? He was on a lengthy stipend from CATO, IIRC. MADem Oct 2013 #32
Joseph McCarthy is that you? Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #37
If he says he wasn't employed by Cato he is lying--and calling me "McCarthy" isn't going to change MADem Oct 2013 #39
Really. For how long and what was the stipend? And was Kos and Wyden paid... Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #40
Don't plead with me to defend "Kos" and "Wyden." That's not how it works. MADem Oct 2013 #47
You act as though you are revealing deep dark secrets. Squawk! Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #49
No I don't...you're the one who started out denying it, and now you're trying to accuse me of MADem Oct 2013 #52
I've denied nothing. You are peddling in half truths. Yes. 16 pages of published material Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #53
They're "touting" the work of their "contributor" in order to raise his, and their, profile. MADem Oct 2013 #57
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2013 #56
+1. nt pnwmom Oct 2013 #28
You're not very familiar with his work, are you? Since he burst on the sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #45
What? Nothing about Greenwald's IRS problems? randome Oct 2013 #11
Recommend! Fascinating Read! KoKo Oct 2013 #14
I've heard Greenwald speak several times and he's always been witty and gracious. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #15
Good article Autumn Oct 2013 #18
K&R just to get the reflexive Greenwald haters in a frenzy nt riderinthestorm Oct 2013 #19
lol's they have him on the list with Cindy Sheehan who exposed Bush in a Ditch KoKo Oct 2013 #20
Enemy of the World now? Does he get a cape and spandex with that? Rex Oct 2013 #21
It's FEAR of WHAT HAS BEEN EXPOSED! They are horrified that this could KoKo Oct 2013 #24
It is just funny watching people that normally hate CTs Rex Oct 2013 #27
Agree...and think that word hypocrisy has been expunged from School Rooms all KoKo Oct 2013 #29
Well I know we've both watched critical thinking disparaged on DU Rex Oct 2013 #31
The corporate-government propaganda MUST smear Glenn Greenwald woo me with science Oct 2013 #23
It's a HUGE STORY...that in other times would have been blaring from KoKo Oct 2013 #26
+10000000 woo me with science Oct 2013 #33
Pierre Omidyar is eliciting Greenwald because of Jeff Bezos. joshcryer Oct 2013 #30
Guardian Newspaper has three Investigations coming at them..One big one KoKo Oct 2013 #34
Well yeah, spying and surveillance is also a business. joshcryer Oct 2013 #35
I think what I'm reading is that you think KoKo Oct 2013 #36
That's the $250 million dollar question. joshcryer Oct 2013 #38
Greenwald will never be a corporate sell out. That is the fantasy of sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #46
Squawk! He worked for Cato. Squawk! He worked for Cato. Squawk! He worked for Cato. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #50
Huge K&R. Greenwald is a hero. woo me with science Oct 2013 #25
depends what the definition is STATE -is upi402 Oct 2013 #41
this just reminded me of Elaine Benes on Seinfeld in Europe with controlling Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #48
Isn't it weird that Elaine did! OMG! Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #51
It's a puff piece struggle4progress Oct 2013 #54
Absolutely! Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Enemy of the State: How G...»Reply #37