Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Those policies do not qualify under the AcA. bravenak Oct 2013 #1
But that was not what the President promised. He said "If you like your health plan you can keep kelly1mm Oct 2013 #5
He also gave a list of what services the insurers were now required to provide. bravenak Oct 2013 #18
I did hear it. I knew at the time that the two statements were incongruant. You cannot have kelly1mm Oct 2013 #29
Now they get better plans at better prices. A policy they will like better. bravenak Oct 2013 #41
The problem is that the President, being generous, exaggerated in selling the ACA. I LOVE kelly1mm Oct 2013 #47
He did not mislead you. bravenak Oct 2013 #52
The PROBLEM is the Insurance Industry did it as an FU to ACA. Tigress DEM Oct 2013 #89
So they canceled policies as opposed to sending out notices of changes in policy and price? cui bono Oct 2013 #110
And this is the problem of entrusting something as vital as health care to for-profit vultures. BlueStreak Oct 2013 #68
EXACTLY! Tigress DEM Oct 2013 #90
And people will be getting BETTER plans for comparable prices. Proud Liberal Dem Oct 2013 #31
Some will. Many will not. BlueStreak Oct 2013 #69
I suspect one would no longer "like" a worse more expensive plan. joshcryer Oct 2013 #34
But quite a few people would prefer worse plans if they were cheaper, and ACA ratifies this eridani Oct 2013 #79
ACA actually requires states to have a non-profit pool. joshcryer Oct 2013 #81
Endless proliferation of small pools is exactly what the problem is eridani Oct 2013 #95
Yep. joshcryer Oct 2013 #97
Luckily, the ACA allows for state single payer plans starting in 2017 eridani Oct 2013 #98
The dividing line is competition, not geography BlueStreak Oct 2013 #100
Nah, a Kieser plan in one county will be different from another. joshcryer Oct 2013 #103
WHY would you like your old policy jazzimov Oct 2013 #53
Because men don't need pre-natal care and that is a significant expense and a new essential service. dkf Oct 2013 #94
Men father those children getting pre-natal care, so if that's the best you got, forget it. SolutionisSolidarity Oct 2013 #105
Well you asked why a person would prefer their old plan. dkf Oct 2013 #106
File it under *!* along with "clean coal". L0oniX Oct 2013 #120
Television editor? itsrobert Oct 2013 #2
Most of the reality shows are non-union. cui bono Oct 2013 #109
Why did the President say that (on multiple occasions)? It was obvious to those following kelly1mm Oct 2013 #3
they are getting BETTER Insurance.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #6
Well, they are getting more comprehensive insurance I agree. However, that was not what was kelly1mm Oct 2013 #9
So what if it was an exaggeration. It was less of an exaggeration than "death panels." stopbush Oct 2013 #36
OK. Somehow I thought I could trust the President. My bad. nt kelly1mm Oct 2013 #40
You're like the child at Disneyland whining, "but you said we'd go on Dumbo next." stopbush Oct 2013 #74
No you didn't VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #82
I NEVER said I was effected by ACA mandates in any way. Another poster did. kelly1mm Oct 2013 #87
Geeebus.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #91
Did you review the link in post 59? nt kelly1mm Oct 2013 #92
Okay let's try this again, ACA halted the pre-existing conditions, it had limits, would you rather Thinkingabout Oct 2013 #39
I totally agree! What I don't understand is why the President said if you liked kelly1mm Oct 2013 #42
I think the policy you had in 2013 had limitations you dont want to be subject, why doesn't your Thinkingabout Oct 2013 #48
Because the insurance companies can make a hell of a lot more money BlueStreak Oct 2013 #117
You're absolutely right. cui bono Oct 2013 #108
These anarchists don't realize how great paying premiums, copays and deductibles are NoOneMan Oct 2013 #17
There are loads of people on this site that are still in denial about that BlueStreak Oct 2013 #7
Because he didn't expect insurance companies to be dickbags Trekologer Oct 2013 #43
He probably figured he didn't need to explain that major ripoff policies kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #83
Why ar you attacking a poster who made a perfectly correct observation? cui bono Oct 2013 #111
They aren't all immediate cancellations BlueStreak Oct 2013 #4
You forget....there are tax subsidies.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #8
You do know that a couple both making $15 per hour at 40 hour a week jobs will not qualify kelly1mm Oct 2013 #11
We'll fix it later! NoOneMan Oct 2013 #15
What is this mythical couple doing for health coverage now? Ikonoklast Oct 2013 #20
Perhaps something like the non-mythical Bluestreak is doing as described in this sub-thread, which kelly1mm Oct 2013 #25
Strictly conjecture on your part. Ikonoklast Oct 2013 #121
Oh yes they do! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #27
Did you read my post. Did you see the part about a couple. What is the cuttoff for kelly1mm Oct 2013 #37
I can tell you why with one graphic... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #44
Ummmmmm, you do know that my example is at 401% of FPL, right? So, what exactly kelly1mm Oct 2013 #50
adjusted gross? VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #51
Yes. ACA adjusted gross of a 2 person household with each person making $15 per hour kelly1mm Oct 2013 #54
that's GROSS...not adjusted! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #55
And I keep telling you that you do not know how ACA adjusted Gross Income is calculated. kelly1mm Oct 2013 #59
Standard Deductions...EVERYONE gets them.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #60
You can get the standard deduction, but it has no effect on the subsidy BlueStreak Oct 2013 #101
That is not true.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #102
AFTER TAX....see below... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #104
adjusted gross income VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #56
taxable...I even forgot about that one! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #57
Not really as I specifically stated that there was no IRA/401k/HSA contributions. See link kelly1mm Oct 2013 #61
wherein I reminded you then you would opt for Standard Deduction.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #62
You REALLY don't get this so you? Do you do tax work for a living? I do. In fact, if you kelly1mm Oct 2013 #64
this is pathetic... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #73
I agree. Did you even bother to read the link provided in post 59? nt. kelly1mm Oct 2013 #77
two words for you ....ADJUSTED GROSS! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #45
Do you know how AGI is calculated for ACA premium subsidy calculations? I do. Not much kelly1mm Oct 2013 #49
You do have a standard deduction! Everyone does! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #58
You do know that a standard deduction in INCOME TAX calculations comes AFTER AGI kelly1mm Oct 2013 #70
If your itemized is less than standard...you take the standard...which in this case... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #71
Again, which has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with ACA MAGI or Income Tax AGI. You do not kelly1mm Oct 2013 #76
I commend you for your tenacity and mostly your patience! cui bono Oct 2013 #112
You know 400% of the poverty level is not all that high BlueStreak Oct 2013 #24
Do you know what poverty is? VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #30
What is your point? BlueStreak Oct 2013 #63
the point is...there are SUSIDIES! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #66
People above 400% of poverty are not wealthy BlueStreak Oct 2013 #72
How about off-exchange policies? Nye Bevan Oct 2013 #10
Anthem says they will not have any off-exchange policies BlueStreak Oct 2013 #21
May I ask what state you are in? Nye Bevan Oct 2013 #26
Indiana. They have off-exchange policies TODAY BlueStreak Oct 2013 #75
Take a look at Assurant. Nye Bevan Oct 2013 #115
Thanks for the reference BlueStreak Oct 2013 #118
Wow are you in a red state? mucifer Oct 2013 #12
He is leaving the fact that he will qualify for subidies... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #32
That is irrelevant. BlueStreak Oct 2013 #80
Now the truth is finally eeking out..... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #86
That is such a nonsensical diatribe that it cannot be answered. BlueStreak Oct 2013 #107
Makes perfect sense.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #114
I think "cancellations" is a bit misleading PSPS Oct 2013 #13
Also, the provider network for the new plan is probably considerably smaller (nt) Nye Bevan Oct 2013 #28
I need their post codes, income and bra sizes before I believe them NoOneMan Oct 2013 #14
...and MANY of us were thrilled. ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #16
"We Will Keep This Promise to the American People" solarhydrocan Oct 2013 #19
We were all misled, it seems. BlueStreak Oct 2013 #22
YOU are the one being misleading! Purposely! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #33
Other than just passing out insults BlueStreak Oct 2013 #65
you are not being honest.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #67
Why are you obsessed with my income? It is irrelevant to the issue. BlueStreak Oct 2013 #84
the same POLICY with LESSSSS! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #88
It is not a superset. It is a stripped down POS policy BlueStreak Oct 2013 #99
You're saying you'd like a more costly plan with less coverage? joshcryer Oct 2013 #38
Where did I say anything? solarhydrocan Oct 2013 #93
I don't know what your position is, then. joshcryer Oct 2013 #96
The sky is falling. Wolf, Wolf. This house is made of straw. Health Care Debunker's Fairy Tales. libdem4life Oct 2013 #23
EXACTLY.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #35
In case anyone misses this... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #46
"Thousands" = Millions. Skip Intro Oct 2013 #78
DU seems to have about a dozen posters who spend all day every day kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #85
And there's a dozen posters who can't accept the fact that Obama isn't perfect cui bono Oct 2013 #113
Some of them were trolls before Oct 1, to be fair nt geek tragedy Oct 2013 #116
"Obama’s promise" ...well that doesn't mean it will happen... L0oniX Oct 2013 #119
My Florida Blue plan sucked when I had it. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2013 #122
No. The cancellations are THE EXCUSE GIVEN, NOT any LEGITIMATE cause. Same with hours. WinkyDink Oct 2013 #123
is that good or bad? kentuck Oct 2013 #124
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Thousands Of Consumers Ge...»Reply #45