Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

socialist_n_TN

(11,481 posts)
40. How's that "...well-regulated, non-crony capitalism and solid...
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 07:24 PM
Oct 2013

social safety net..." thing working out for ya? One nice thing about holding a Marxist viewpoint is that you're trained to look on time scales longer than a single lifetime. It's a systemic outlook that goes from primitive, communal prehistoric tribes to slave culture, to feudalism, to capitalism and then expands this idea of a progression into the future to socialism and finally communism where a social steady state is found.

To a Marxist, the "well-regulated and non-crony capitalism" of the middle decades of the previous century was a aberration that wouldn't hold forever. It was the Keynesians who thought they could "tame" capitalism. Marxists always knew that the capitalism that we have now would return sooner or later because that's what capitalism IS. And it has returned with a vengeance.

All you have to do is study some history of the USA and you'll see that that mythical "well-regulated capitalism" was a mirage all along. Every time capitalism gets out of control, it's "regulated" AND THEN IT THROWS OFF THOSE REGULATIONS! Regulation happened at the end of the Gilded Age and was thrown off during the Roaring 20s. After it crashed the world economy, it was "regulated" AGAIN, until it threw off those 1930s regulations AGAIN and crashed the world economy AGAIN. What makes you (or anyone) think that "regulation" will ever work over the long term?

Because capitalism concentrates wealth and power in a small elite group (that's it's purpose), that group WILL ALWAYS SEEK TO THROW OFF ANY STRICTURES PUT ON IT. And because they DO have the wealth and power, THEY WILL ALWAYS SUCCEED IN DOING SO.

Regulating capitalism is like riding a tiger. It's very hard to do and you're always in danger of being eaten.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

On general principles... gcomeau Oct 2013 #1
Lazy writing and idiocy rules alternative media. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #2
hear hear! sick of it. It is an attempt to create the same climate of 1999 and 2000 when Bush Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #3
got that right warrprayer Oct 2013 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author mother earth Oct 2013 #15
There's false equivalence pscot Oct 2013 #5
+1,000,000,000 /nt Drale Oct 2013 #7
+17,000,000,000,000 n/t SamYeager Oct 2013 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author mother earth Oct 2013 #16
You have got to be kidding gcomeau Oct 2013 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author mother earth Oct 2013 #22
That's a great principle. I don't think they are the same. But the OP didn't say that BelgianMadCow Oct 2013 #17
Like I said... gcomeau Oct 2013 #18
I hear you. Here's how I see it BelgianMadCow Oct 2013 #19
Well said. nt mother earth Oct 2013 #25
Is that that surprising? Mass Oct 2013 #4
It seems that in this country, no party has a chance at becoming a majority party LuvNewcastle Oct 2013 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author mother earth Oct 2013 #27
K&R woo me with science Oct 2013 #8
These 2 parties couldn't be further apart. Possibly the furthest in US history. JaneyVee Oct 2013 #11
We need to acknowledge what's staring us in the face. Our gov't has been rendered mother earth Oct 2013 #13
The dysfunction is precisely because the two parties are farthest from each other than ever before stevenleser Oct 2013 #52
So there's no support from dems for TPP? Glass-Steagall is going to be reinstated? mother earth Oct 2013 #58
Healthcare reform, Tax rates, gay rights, women's equality, abortion, Iran policy, etc. stevenleser Oct 2013 #59
What's not compelling is we get ONLY what big business doesn't care about, therein are the only mother earth Oct 2013 #60
While true, it is worse for the working class when the right-wing is in power. Starry Messenger Oct 2013 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author mother earth Oct 2013 #14
Why yes, yes they do. In fact....... socialist_n_TN Oct 2013 #21
Since I'm okay with well-regulated, non-crony capitalism... Silent3 Oct 2013 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author mother earth Oct 2013 #37
How's that "...well-regulated, non-crony capitalism and solid... socialist_n_TN Oct 2013 #40
How's that Marxist thing working out in practice? Silent3 Oct 2013 #41
So you're comparing a system that's been actually in place for three centuries or so...... socialist_n_TN Oct 2013 #42
I'll gladly compare something that's really been done with someone's pipe dream... Silent3 Oct 2013 #43
The first attempt at Marxism in practice degenerated into Stalinism...... socialist_n_TN Oct 2013 #44
You have some magic solution that eliminates all of the "pressures"... Silent3 Oct 2013 #47
Why yes, yes I do. They're called work councils and neighborhood councils....... socialist_n_TN Oct 2013 #48
Of course, none of those people working in such councils... Silent3 Oct 2013 #49
That's the "immediately recallable delegates" part........ socialist_n_TN Oct 2013 #56
At least in your untried, purely hypothetical dreams. n/t Silent3 Oct 2013 #57
They do, but the liberals believe it should be regulated treestar Oct 2013 #24
Absolutely! randome Oct 2013 #45
It is a bit liberating when you begin to see through the charade. Puzzledtraveller Oct 2013 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author mother earth Oct 2013 #28
The Democratic party is the party that keeps saving capitalism from itself coldmountain Oct 2013 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author mother earth Oct 2013 #31
Modern economic systems are a blend of private and government ownership FarCenter Oct 2013 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author mother earth Oct 2013 #33
Interestingly, you make a good point. DireStrike Oct 2013 #46
Lenin's definition of communism FarCenter Oct 2013 #51
You prove my point DireStrike Oct 2013 #53
That would be a left anarchist definition. FarCenter Oct 2013 #54
Engels: DireStrike Oct 2013 #55
the corporate state has two teams datasuspect Oct 2013 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author mother earth Oct 2013 #34
Fuck Ralph Nader...nt SidDithers Oct 2013 #35
Two capitalist parties fighting over campaign contributions. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2013 #36
exactly. liberal_at_heart Oct 2013 #39
Lets Get Mobilized ! Othervoice Oct 2013 #38
Yup. woo me with science Oct 2013 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nothing’s changed: Both p...»Reply #40