Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Which one of these views should liberals/progressives be more tolerant of: [View all]You should just put who you're callin out in the thread title
It makes a passive aggressive pile-on attempt at least a bit more respectable.
(Background: ProSense got into it with an anti-abortion Democrat in another thread).
That said, while I'm personally pro-choice because I don't think the power of the state should be making these kinds of personal decisions for women, I recognize abortion is one of the trickiest and most difficult political, philosophical, and moral issues of our time. There is a vast, vast spectrum of belief for a vast variety of reasons - some more valid than others. I can respect certain anti-abortion views on a principled level while disagreeing firmly on how those views should be reflected in the law.
A party that makes room for complex thought is a strengthened party.
I respect Th1one from their history as a poster even if I don't agree on this particular issue. In fact, I disagree with him/her pretty strongly as a matter of law.
It makes a passive aggressive pile-on attempt at least a bit more respectable.
(Background: ProSense got into it with an anti-abortion Democrat in another thread).
That said, while I'm personally pro-choice because I don't think the power of the state should be making these kinds of personal decisions for women, I recognize abortion is one of the trickiest and most difficult political, philosophical, and moral issues of our time. There is a vast, vast spectrum of belief for a vast variety of reasons - some more valid than others. I can respect certain anti-abortion views on a principled level while disagreeing firmly on how those views should be reflected in the law.
A party that makes room for complex thought is a strengthened party.
I respect Th1one from their history as a poster even if I don't agree on this particular issue. In fact, I disagree with him/her pretty strongly as a matter of law.
The thread is about a lot of the sentiments being expressed by several people, and was intended as a serious question and discussion.
You are the one who chose to call out another DUer.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Which one of these views should liberals/progressives be more tolerant of: [View all]
ProSense
Oct 2013
OP
do you think the numbers ad up to form a solid majority based on both economic progressivism
Douglas Carpenter
Oct 2013
#36
I can be tolerant if they don't want to vote, want to opt out of Medicare, want to starve when poor,
Hoyt
Oct 2013
#7
On every issue there is room to debate, else we wouldn't need a discussion group.
Gormy Cuss
Oct 2013
#44
I personally don't care if somebody is anti-choice, as long as they don't expect everybody to agree
MiniMe
Oct 2013
#39