Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
3. Attorney General Eric Holder issued a lawsuit to stop TX voter ID law.
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 02:09 PM
Oct 2013

The rednecks at True the Vote filed a motion intervening in the lawsuit.

Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, August 22, 2013
Justice Department to File New Lawsuit Against State of Texas Over Voter I.D. Law


The Department of Justice announced today that it will file a new lawsuit against the State of Texas, the Texas Secretary of State, and the Director of the Texas Department of Public Safety over the State’s strict voter photo identification law (SB 14). The United States’ complaint seeks a declaration that SB 14 violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, as well as the voting guarantees of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

Separately, the Department is filing a motion to intervene as a party and a complaint in intervention against the State of Texas and the Texas Secretary of State in the ongoing case of Perez v. Perry (W.D. Tex.), which concerns the state’s redistricting laws. The United States had already filed a statement of interest in this case last month. Today’s action represents a new step by the Department in this case that will allow the United States to formally present evidence about the purpose and effect of the Texas redistricting plans.

“Today’s action marks another step forward in the Justice Department’s continuing effort to protect the voting rights of all eligible Americans,” said Attorney General Eric Holder. “We will not allow the Supreme Court’s recent decision to be interpreted as open season for states to pursue measures that suppress voting rights. The Department will take action against jurisdictions that attempt to hinder access to the ballot box, no matter where it occurs. We will keep fighting aggressively to prevent voter disenfranchisement. We are determined to use all available authorities, including remaining sections of the Voting Rights Act, to guard against discrimination and, where appropriate, to ask federal courts to require preclearance of new voting changes. This represents the Department’s latest action to protect voting rights, but it will not be our last.”

In the voter ID lawsuit, the United States’ complaint contends that SB 14 was adopted with the purpose, and will have the result, of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race, color, or membership in a language minority group. The complaint asks the court to prohibit Texas from enforcing the requirements of its law, and also requests that the court order bail-in relief under Section 3 of the Voting Rights Act. If granted, this would subject Texas to a new preclearance requirement.

In the Department’s other filing announced today, the United States seeks a declaration that Texas’s 2011 redistricting plans for the U.S. Congress and the Texas State House of Representatives were adopted with the purpose of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race, color, or membership in a language minority group in violation of Section 2, as well as the voting guarantees of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The complaint also requests that the court order bail-in pursuant to Section 3(c) of the Voting Rights Act, to remedy persistent, intentional discrimination in voting within the State of Texas.

“The Department of Justice will use all the tools it has available to ensure that each citizen can cast a ballot free from impermissible discrimination,” said Jocelyn Samuels, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “The right to the franchise is one of the most fundamental promises of American democracy.”

If the federal courts in either the redistricting or voter identification cases find that the State of Texas should be covered by Section 3(c), then the State would be required to submit voting changes to the U.S. Attorney General or to the federal court for review prior to implementation to ensure that the changes do not have a discriminatory effect or a discriminatory purpose. The Department has previously participated as amicus in the Perez case, and last month advised the federal court in Texas that the Department believed the imposition of a new preclearance requirement on Texas under Section 3(c) of the Voting Rights Act was appropriate. Today’s filing asks the Court to allow the Department to participate as a party in further proceedings on the question of whether Texas should be made subject to Section 3(c).

A federal court in the District of Columbia has previously held that Texas had failed to meet its burden of proving that its 2011 redistricting plans and its 2011 voter identification law were not discriminatory under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. These decisions were vacated after the Supreme Court’s June decision in Shelby County v. Holder. The Supreme Court’s decision left unaffected the non-discrimination requirements of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, as well as the bail-in provisions of Section 3 of the Voting Rights Act, and today’s filings seek to enforce those important protections.

The filings in the Texas redistricting and Texas voter identification matters will be available on the Civil Rights Division’s website later today. More information about the Voting Rights Act and other federal voting laws is available on the Department of Justice website at www.justice.gov/crt/about/vot/. Complaints about discriminatory voting practices may be reported to the Voting Section of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division at 1-800-253-3931.

God damnit the fucking DOJ needs to get on this shit gopiscrap Oct 2013 #1
.... CatWoman Oct 2013 #2
Attorney General Eric Holder issued a lawsuit to stop TX voter ID law. Coyotl Oct 2013 #3
Good, thank you, I didn't realize that gopiscrap Oct 2013 #5
OMG. This is awful. You're right. We need to get the DOJ on the ball. Th1onein Oct 2013 #4
A previous on this thread posted that the DOJ is on it gopiscrap Oct 2013 #6
Alrighty, things went exactly as they had planned etherealtruth Oct 2013 #7
Yep. LisaL Oct 2013 #8
In legal filing they claim it isn't discrimination because they've done it in so many states. Coyotl Oct 2013 #14
Exactly etherealtruth Oct 2013 #18
What the Voter ID Law Really Means for Women in Texas Coyotl Oct 2013 #9
It's very hard to get an ID in TX. Even for those who drive. LisaL Oct 2013 #10
You ain't kidding. When I moved here I had to first get my car registered, and then ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #20
Texas Asks U.S. Judge to Dismiss Photo ID Voter Lawsuit Coyotl Oct 2013 #11
I hope there are some serious lawyers involved in trying to Skidmore Oct 2013 #12
Infographic on States Trying to Restrict Minority Voting Rights Coyotl Oct 2013 #13
It is not easy to get the ID card in Texas dem in texas Oct 2013 #15
Exactly. LisaL Oct 2013 #17
'pukes know and revel in the fact that an individual will likely give up if given enough hoops to indepat Oct 2013 #23
They are weighing the benefits and the political costs and they know it means more victories. Coyotl Oct 2013 #24
That's what it looks like. LisaL Oct 2013 #32
That was their intent. jsr Oct 2013 #16
They are grasping at adavid Oct 2013 #19
Oh, it is not straws. The art of shaving points to win elections is as old as elections. Coyotl Oct 2013 #25
It's hard to imagine that making it harder to get a driver's license ... surrealAmerican Oct 2013 #21
The Future of the Voting Rights Act - How effective is Section 2 ... Coyotl Oct 2013 #22
Is some sort of federal ID enough? Or does it have to be a state issued ID?............. socialist_n_TN Oct 2013 #26
Imagine the right-wing outrage if the federal government offered everyone a free ID. Coyotl Oct 2013 #31
Jim Crow II pitbullgirl1965 Oct 2013 #27
Yes and yes. Restore all voting rights and have a Democracy Day holiday for voting. Coyotl Oct 2013 #28
100+ pitbullgirl1965 Oct 2013 #29
Something Must Be Done IrishAyes Oct 2013 #30
Public backlash is needed with a strong voter registration drive and intense GOTV efforts. Coyotl Oct 2013 #33
Hey, buster! I'm almost 68! IrishAyes Oct 2013 #34
Voting Rights Group: Over 1 In 10 Texas Voters Lack ID Required To Vote Coyotl Oct 2013 #35
Kick Scurrilous Oct 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TEXAS Republicans have di...»Reply #3