HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » TEXAS Republicans have di... » Reply #22

Response to Coyotl (Original post)

Sun Oct 27, 2013, 03:25 PM

22. The Future of the Voting Rights Act - How effective is Section 2 ...

 

The Future of the Voting Rights Act
How effective is Section 2, the part of the law the Supreme Court left alone?


By Nicholas Stephanopoulos - http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/10/section_2_of_the_voting_rights_act_is_more_effective_than_expected_new_research.html

A voting rights battle royal began last month when the Department of Justice sued North Carolina over its restrictive new election law. DOJ alleged that the law, which imposes a photo ID requirement for voting, ends same-day voter registration, and cuts back on early voting, violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Earlier this summer the DOJ also filed two Section 2 suits against Texas, arguing that its photo ID law and electoral district maps are illegal.

Section 2 is the VRA’s core remaining prohibition of racial discrimination in voting. It bans practices that make it more difficult for minority voters to “participate in the political process” and “elect representatives of their choice.” It applies to both redistricting (as in Texas) and voting restrictions (as in North Carolina). And it just became a whole lot more important thanks to the Supreme Court’s June decision in Shelby County v. Holder, which neutered the VRA’s other key provision, Section 5. Section 5 used to bar certain states and cities, mostly in the South, from changing their election laws unless they first received federal approval. To get approval, the jurisdictions had to prove that their changes wouldn’t make minority voters worse off. Now that Section 5 is essentially gone, all eyes are on Section 2.

How effective is Section 2 at protecting minorities’ voting rights compared with Section 5? Surprisingly, there’s not much research out there on this question. To figure out the answer, I analyzed data about all districts in the South and all VRA lawsuits around the country. Here’s the gist of what I found: Section 2 is worse than Section 5 at stopping redistricting that breaks up districts in which minority voters are numerous enough to elect their preferred candidates. But it’s better at blocking voting restrictions than is commonly realized (though not as good as Section 5). .....

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 36 replies Author Time Post
Coyotl Oct 2013 OP
gopiscrap Oct 2013 #1
CatWoman Oct 2013 #2
Coyotl Oct 2013 #3
gopiscrap Oct 2013 #5
Th1onein Oct 2013 #4
gopiscrap Oct 2013 #6
etherealtruth Oct 2013 #7
LisaL Oct 2013 #8
Coyotl Oct 2013 #14
etherealtruth Oct 2013 #18
Coyotl Oct 2013 #9
LisaL Oct 2013 #10
ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #20
Coyotl Oct 2013 #11
Skidmore Oct 2013 #12
Coyotl Oct 2013 #13
dem in texas Oct 2013 #15
LisaL Oct 2013 #17
indepat Oct 2013 #23
Coyotl Oct 2013 #24
LisaL Oct 2013 #32
jsr Oct 2013 #16
adavid Oct 2013 #19
Coyotl Oct 2013 #25
surrealAmerican Oct 2013 #21
LineReply The Future of the Voting Rights Act - How effective is Section 2 ...
Coyotl Oct 2013 #22
socialist_n_TN Oct 2013 #26
Coyotl Oct 2013 #31
pitbullgirl1965 Oct 2013 #27
Coyotl Oct 2013 #28
pitbullgirl1965 Oct 2013 #29
IrishAyes Oct 2013 #30
Coyotl Oct 2013 #33
IrishAyes Oct 2013 #34
Coyotl Oct 2013 #35
Scurrilous Oct 2013 #36
Please login to view edit histories.