Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(881 posts)

7. This is an interesting development, because

Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:11 AM

Oct 2013

further discussion of the topic will reveal who is truly anti-NSA or just anti-Obama.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama kept in dark about Angela Merkel surveillance? [View all] kentuck Oct 2013 OP

"Discuss" MannyGoldstein Oct 2013 #1

Except they did. geek tragedy Oct 2013 #2

There's a paywall on WSJ. nt MannyGoldstein Oct 2013 #5

The story is all over the Intertubes nt geek tragedy Oct 2013 #6

And they're sticking to it no matter what. R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2013 #10

It seems very believable that some Cheneyites embedded in the NSA geek tragedy Oct 2013 #11

The "fact" that they didn't state pscot Oct 2013 #3

The head of the NSA has already been R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2013 #12

Any similarities to Reagan...? kentuck Oct 2013 #4

I wouldn't go that far Hutzpa Oct 2013 #9

Plausible deniability pscot Oct 2013 #13

This is an interesting development, because BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #7

This is the sole reason why I think NSA is a dangerous organisation Hutzpa Oct 2013 #8

I'm not sure which is scarier FreeJoe Oct 2013 #14