Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Of course he's going to expect the Libertarian to work with him on drug legislation reform. msanthrope Oct 2013 #1
Knew there was more to it than met the eye. joshcryer Oct 2013 #3
No shit---the two paragraph selective excerpt that didn't mention drugs? Tip off that something was msanthrope Oct 2013 #5
Silly NSA apologist! joshcryer Oct 2013 #13
I thought I was Stasi? It's tough to keep up. nt msanthrope Oct 2013 #16
From the OP: "Drug policy could be one area where he finds some success" Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #33
Tell us why you have a problem with Booker working on drug policy? "Bite" is not a direction msanthrope Oct 2013 #36
I've none. Unlike those who have a problem with Democratic and Liberals Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #59
You wrote "Bite on that" to DUers in an OP where you are "happy?" Holy crap-I'd hate to read what msanthrope Oct 2013 #62
I'm sure you were horrified when you read those words. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #64
I had expected more erudition from someone in your profession, frankly. As an avid Rude Pundit msanthrope Oct 2013 #71
My job as a paid assassin requires little erudition. In fact, I rarely talk at work. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #86
Heh ... 1000words Oct 2013 #92
That explains the WSJ subscription. nt msanthrope Oct 2013 #96
You have a lively imagination. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #110
Sadly, I cannot return the compliment. nt msanthrope Oct 2013 #122
Sadly, I cannot turn my comment into one. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #132
They said 'bite on that' to 'NSA apologists' muriel_volestrangler Oct 2013 #245
I say never ever work with Paul. joshcryer Oct 2013 #268
+1... BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #7
Really. Senators are free to associate and make alliances on specific issues... Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #17
What do you have against ending the Drug War? BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #20
Nothing. An I don't have anything against Democrats working with Libertarians Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #34
when someone teamed up with paul questionseverything Oct 2013 #331
Senators need 'votes' to further legislation--here's a primer..... msanthrope Oct 2013 #23
... BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #24
And citizens need as many voices as possible to exert public pressure to change policies. nt woo me with science Oct 2013 #38
I am sure that you support Booker's efforts to change drug policy, right? nt msanthrope Oct 2013 #40
Here's my succinct summary of this stale, manipulative corporate spin: woo me with science Oct 2013 #43
Indeed--why the OP would post ANYTHING from Murdoch's Wall Street Journal is puzzling. msanthrope Oct 2013 #47
I know! They were the ones who reported today woo me with science Oct 2013 #49
Silly things such as: BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #51
Oh lordy....losing on this issue, you switch to President Obama? Are Booker and Obama fungible to msanthrope Oct 2013 #52
So the WSJ is spinning Booker's intent to work with Paul? Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #66
Isn't that a question you should have asked yourself BEFORE you used the Murdoch source? nt msanthrope Oct 2013 #72
If Booker didn't want it reported, he shouldn't have said it. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #89
836 words, 23 paragraphs, drug policy mentioned 3 times. joshcryer Oct 2013 #77
Ending wars, de-militarization of the U.S. of A., surveillance dreamnightwind Oct 2013 #131
They are not for ending wars. joshcryer Oct 2013 #136
You're wrong dreamnightwind Oct 2013 #196
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2013 #341
It's so beautiful. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #45
Activists have an impact electorally, not legislatively, generally. joshcryer Oct 2013 #27
youre on roll, lol. BootinUp Oct 2013 #41
Are you done deleting posts yet? Marr Oct 2013 #267
+1 Tuesday Afternoon Oct 2013 #8
Nailed it...nt SidDithers Oct 2013 #25
You Better Believe It! nt msanthrope Oct 2013 #32
Drug policy is mentioned in my excerpt. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #29
It's not bolded. joshcryer Oct 2013 #35
Because bold words make the others unreadable. Hahahaha. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #63
I think Booker would be for privacy laws. joshcryer Oct 2013 #65
What are you blathering on about? I never made the claim that libertarians Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #168
Erm, you said "any criticism of anti-NSA bedfellows." joshcryer Oct 2013 #171
I can and will make a distinction between government surveillance and corporate surveillance... Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #186
No, they are not "separate legislative fights." joshcryer Oct 2013 #190
No Josh, they are not the same. The outcome will be similar but the corporate Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #198
Corporate data selling is trivial to implement. joshcryer Oct 2013 #201
We will disagree about this. HIPAA privacy was primarily driven Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #213
ELUA's are unenforcable. joshcryer Oct 2013 #236
Great catch! silverweb Oct 2013 #37
there would be no point going to the Senate is one isn't willing to try to get votes to pass JI7 Oct 2013 #2
I think every single newly elected Democrat should barricade themselves in their office, and msanthrope Oct 2013 #4
On changing VERY specific DRUG laws. MADem Oct 2013 #6
Booker is "paling around" with Rand Paul. Did you hear? Imagine! A Senator-elect making msanthrope Oct 2013 #14
I am shocked, SHOCKED, I tell you, that he'd make good on a campaign promise by joining the MADem Oct 2013 #26
You should read the attempts to rehabilitate this OP in this thread---apparently, we've msanthrope Oct 2013 #54
Gee, is that suddenly a "positive" kind of exhortation? Who knew? MADem Oct 2013 #57
We need a new avatar. "Bite on That!" It's right up there with "Yes, We Can!" msanthrope Oct 2013 #58
It's my new sig line. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #70
Why not include the permalink to this thread? nt msanthrope Oct 2013 #74
Good idea! Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #90
Thanks for editing the OP back. joshcryer Oct 2013 #93
Oh I have. DUers who have clearly stated that they are against NSA excesses Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #98
Classic MadHound. joshcryer Oct 2013 #73
You know, Skinner, in his infinite wisdom, gave posters the option to stop digging with self-delete. msanthrope Oct 2013 #76
Oh, we love our words, our thoughts, they are our mind children Fumesucker Oct 2013 #202
STOP IT! Rex Oct 2013 #205
That is lovely. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #215
he is a good example of how fucked up some of this is, didn't want to report a pedophile ring JI7 Oct 2013 #220
Well, I'd say "Unbelievable!" but since I see what I see with my own lying eyes, I guess I'd just MADem Oct 2013 #276
I'd appreciate it if you quote me correctly. It is not "Bite me," but rather Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #293
I guess I'll give that admonition all the attention it deserves, eh? nt MADem Oct 2013 #294
But liberal activists are suspect when they form strange alliances on the odd occasion. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #94
No, not "the odd occasion." The "odd occasion" wouldn't raise any eyebrows. MADem Oct 2013 #287
You've wandered way off the farm. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #290
Well, with this thread, I'd say you've purchased the thing! MADem Oct 2013 #297
Not once said, "bite on that NSA apologists," Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #308
Smart politics Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #9
They could also work together on tax breaks for private equity firms. nt geek tragedy Oct 2013 #10
Ouch.. Fumesucker Oct 2013 #183
I'm copying this OP..... msanthrope Oct 2013 #11
I like the original edit, myself. joshcryer Oct 2013 #18
Noted--Here's the original msanthrope Oct 2013 #21
Not too subtle, is he? But hey, Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal is just a nifty source, there, MADem Oct 2013 #31
FYI OP is a she. joshcryer Oct 2013 #39
Ah, I stand corrected. MADem Oct 2013 #277
This is the OP you *should* have copied Fumesucker Oct 2013 #218
What did it say, as a matter of interest? muriel_volestrangler Oct 2013 #246
The thread title was "Don't Ally With Libertarians" and it wasn't snark Fumesucker Oct 2013 #248
The very same people high 5ing each other in that thread over Rex Oct 2013 #304
If he wants to work with him on ending the $60 Billion a year drug war, that's great. Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #12
If this is supposed to be a smear against Sen-Elect Booker, it is a failure. nt BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #15
Epic fail--which is why I copied the OP into a post as a hedge against self-delete. nt msanthrope Oct 2013 #19
Good work. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #22
This is in my Hall of Fame of epic fails---you might find it amusing...Check the recs. msanthrope Oct 2013 #28
This is my Hall of Fame epic fail post by your buddy Oilwellian Oct 2013 #97
I think it's a great post. If you can't tell the substantive difference between msanthrope Oct 2013 #197
Yep. Great post that has now been self-deleted and the OP also deleted his/her comments. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #217
Before I got to bed, thank you for making this thread! Rex Oct 2013 #221
You are welcome! Good night! Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #222
"march of idiots carrying a Obama-as-Hitler sign" hootinholler Oct 2013 #254
Yeah it was SO great he self-deleted! Rex Oct 2013 #211
But, what happened to the sentiment you shared just recently in this thread: Oilwellian Oct 2013 #95
And I stand by that thread. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #107
You stand by your thread that you deleted. And you deleted your comments. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #219
The special few are well...special. Rex Oct 2013 #305
Your funny! You stood by it so much you deleted it Dragonfli Oct 2013 #337
I did delete it. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #338
What posse would that be junior? You don't like Democrats? Dragonfli Oct 2013 #340
No it isn't. Try again. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #149
What's wrong with working with Rand Paul on this issue? Cali_Democrat Oct 2013 #30
Excellent. Thank you for highlighting the absurdity of the divide and conquer/ woo me with science Oct 2013 #42
Booker isn't getting together with Rand Paul to protest Obama and hold up Obama with hitler JI7 Oct 2013 #44
Yes, that's the point. woo me with science Oct 2013 #50
"Bite on that" as an exhortation to DUers was not written by those you call "the corporate crew." msanthrope Oct 2013 #53
Restored. Oh captain of comity. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #69
Bullshit. No one said we can't protest. joshcryer Oct 2013 #60
Nonsense. Of course people were saying that. woo me with science Oct 2013 #85
California shows how to govern. joshcryer Oct 2013 #88
Could it be that when DU is actually united it is actually united? Fumesucker Oct 2013 #209
Yeah, absolutely. joshcryer Oct 2013 #237
The notable attempt at division during the shutdown crisis came from michigandem58 muriel_volestrangler Oct 2013 #249
Things move so fast here, I'd forgotten that Fumesucker Oct 2013 #250
That's so true. joshcryer Oct 2013 #252
23 DUers rec'd that OP blaming liberals for the shutdown Republicans caused. Many of them Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #258
And? joshcryer Oct 2013 #264
Why are you asking me what you should do? I made my point, you pretended not to get it Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #309
What point? joshcryer Oct 2013 #328
Thanks; that thread and the recs are pretty telling Chathamization Oct 2013 #316
The OP told Duers to "Bite on that" in reference to the comity that Mr. Booker espouses. So I msanthrope Oct 2013 #46
Yep. And not in the spirit of bipartisanship the article was trying to promote. nt BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #48
Telling DUers to "Bite on that" is so charming, isn't it? nt msanthrope Oct 2013 #55
Illuminating. nt BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #61
I was going to say, 'don't worry, they'll forget about this Marr Oct 2013 #105
It's like having discussions in Wonderland, woo me with science Oct 2013 #339
Remember also...his support of Romney and Bain Capital. ErikJ Oct 2013 #56
After reading the entire thread I'm reccing this Fumesucker Oct 2013 #67
What hypocrisy? joshcryer Oct 2013 #68
You're normally smarter than this.. Fumesucker Oct 2013 #75
Where are you getting "jumping for joy"? ucrdem Oct 2013 #79
I wouldn't expect you to Fumesucker Oct 2013 #87
You mean because you made it up? ucrdem Oct 2013 #91
Go ahead, defend Libertarians and working with them all you want Fumesucker Oct 2013 #109
I suppose you made that up too? ucrdem Oct 2013 #113
I would have no problems with that duo ZombieHorde Oct 2013 #239
I wouldn't be surprised at all if Grayson associates himself with this particular bill to amend drug MADem Oct 2013 #284
We are happy that Cory Booker is working with Rand Paul on this. joshcryer Oct 2013 #82
I think the OP expected exactly the reaction they got Fumesucker Oct 2013 #99
There's a difference between "working with" and "aligning with." joshcryer Oct 2013 #108
Of course you're aligned with Libertarians Fumesucker Oct 2013 #116
That's using a more weak version of the word, imo. joshcryer Oct 2013 #128
Do you know anyone you are aligned with 100% on everything? Fumesucker Oct 2013 #137
Myself. joshcryer Oct 2013 #146
Thankfully that's a situation we'll see right after the devil dons ice skates Fumesucker Oct 2013 #160
That's called compromising. joshcryer Oct 2013 #163
I think "agreeing with" would be a more accurate word, don't you? Marr Oct 2013 #120
You are comparing a pundit with a Democratic Senator? Greenwald colludes with Libertarians to msanthrope Oct 2013 #84
Wasn't Greenwald a life-long Republican before he became a Libertarian? ucrdem Oct 2013 #103
Yes. The gullibility of the fringes should surprise no one. I mean, that anyone would think msanthrope Oct 2013 #114
There is much to savor lately in the comedy department. ucrdem Oct 2013 #121
Disparage Dems for not being liberal or progressive enough, but embrace far-right loons. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #123
Far right loons who tell you they are 'liberal' so therefore, they must be. And when you look at msanthrope Oct 2013 #139
And taped his clients without their permission, but now claims to be a privacy advocate. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #142
Worse--he taped a witness. But that caused him to lose the case for his client, msanthrope Oct 2013 #158
"Don't ally with Libertarians" Fumesucker Oct 2013 #194
"Don't ally with Libertarians" Fumesucker Oct 2013 #134
It's good advice. I hope Cory Booker uses the fuck out of Rand Paul. Think he's not smart msanthrope Oct 2013 #154
Would you say you were allied with LaRouchies? joshcryer Oct 2013 #157
I think reasonable people can differ on a lot of things Fumesucker Oct 2013 #165
But we wouldn't announce the alliance. joshcryer Oct 2013 #166
And they think that of you Fumesucker Oct 2013 #176
Which is why their narrative is pushed so often. joshcryer Oct 2013 #178
I wouldn't get any traction if some of it didn't resonate with a larger audience Fumesucker Oct 2013 #188
On a single issue--they aren't getting married. MADem Oct 2013 #281
Perspectives often differ Fumesucker Oct 2013 #295
I haven't insulted anyone. Trying to pretend I did, like you are doing, is BAD FORM. MADem Oct 2013 #298
" You couldn't possibly be more willfully obtuse in those comments of yours if you tried. " Fumesucker Oct 2013 #299
Nice try, but no cigar. I was right on point, and your weak effort to flip is a fail. MADem Oct 2013 #301
As I said a little while ago, perspectives differ Fumesucker Oct 2013 #323
I am not talking about your "perceived personal shortcomings," but if you want to make MADem Oct 2013 #325
You couldn't possibly be more willfully obtuse in those comments of yours if you tried. Fumesucker Oct 2013 #326
What you're doing is called goading and baiting, and you're not a very skilled MADem Oct 2013 #329
I note you're still talking about my personal shortcomings Fumesucker Oct 2013 #330
Bless your heart right back atcha--and I'll refer you to my last post. nt MADem Oct 2013 #336
It is well known now and bookmarked for future mocking. Rex Oct 2013 #182
That's all you have to say about a newly elected Dem senator? ucrdem Oct 2013 #78
Someone had to take over for HiPointDem--they HATED Cory Booker, but since their shit- msanthrope Oct 2013 #104
This thread is highlarious Oilwellian Oct 2013 #80
+1000. Dizzying AND hilarious, both at the same time quinnox Oct 2013 #101
It's classic. woo me with science Oct 2013 #111
Yep-- that's about it. Marr Oct 2013 #126
I'm positively dizzy hootinholler Oct 2013 #257
That vertigo is not due to a medical condition. nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #286
You, you... Oilwellian Oct 2013 #318
No, I didn't. hootinholler Oct 2013 #319
Yes it is truly a double standard Harmony Blue Oct 2013 #283
Confused? No. They're nothing, if not predictable. WorseBeforeBetter Oct 2013 #302
The DEA apologists are out in full force. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #81
Manipulative bullshit... WorseBeforeBetter Oct 2013 #306
What, Rand Paul, that most evil and vile libertarian? quinnox Oct 2013 #83
I didn't really notice that, lol wow yeah I see it now. Rex Oct 2013 #100
Yep. That said, somehow, I don't expect the future "Fuck Rand Paul!" posts to have the addition quinnox Oct 2013 #115
Maybe a disclaimer as a sig line? Rex Oct 2013 #125
lol, good one, a disclaimer sounds like a good idea henceforth... quinnox Oct 2013 #127
Well you know we cannot work with libertarians, unless certain Rex Oct 2013 #133
Kind of like Obama's political appointments that gets everyone's jimmies rustled. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #140
Yeah I know it must suck, you can still self delete that thread. Rex Oct 2013 #144
As I've said twice already, I stand by that thread. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #148
Keep pretending that is true. Rex Oct 2013 #150
I post nothing on here that I wouldn't defend a week later. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #153
Bitter? Oh I get it, you are stuck in a narrative and cannot get out! Rex Oct 2013 #159
Really? Rex Oct 2013 #214
No, you 'self deleted' that OP which is the opposite of standing by it, it is hiding it from view Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #260
Remember this recent, epic post by Bluegrass? Oilwellian Oct 2013 #102
Hmm, with the headline -- "Don’t ally with libertarians" quinnox Oct 2013 #106
Actually, I stand by that thread. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #117
But those same people holding the disparaging signs... Oilwellian Oct 2013 #138
Good call! I cannot believe we were expected to forget something Rex Oct 2013 #145
I responded to it, so... Oilwellian Oct 2013 #162
Thanks for the kick. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #170
I will keep it Bookmarked so I can laugh at them from now on Rex Oct 2013 #174
I doubt any of them voted at all. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #155
This message was self-deleted by its author nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #279
So you'd openly admit your alliance with them? joshcryer Oct 2013 #161
So you imagine that Cory Booker is only going to vote on a Libertarian generated Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #195
Regarding drug policy, I see that as possible. joshcryer Oct 2013 #199
I make the distinction of championing bi-partisan when doing so advances Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #207
As do I, for the most part. joshcryer Oct 2013 #241
Hey! Just yesterday someone suggested I watch Walking Dead... Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #243
Actually you self deleted that thread and shut down the discussion. Opposite of standing by it. Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #261
You'll probably want to delete this post, too. /nt Marr Oct 2013 #270
Now THAT... is hilarious. Marr Oct 2013 #130
... Rex Oct 2013 #172
Yes but the kind of difference some of them want to make essentially destroys lives. gtar100 Oct 2013 #112
I have no problem with Booker making an alliance over a specific issue... Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #119
Maybe we made some headway tonight Oilwellian Oct 2013 #173
Thanks for pointing out that little gem of knowledge. Rex Oct 2013 #177
Well, well, well Oilwellian Oct 2013 #300
Can you believe it!? Rex Oct 2013 #303
No, I can't believe it Oilwellian Oct 2013 #310
It's so... Spandanesque. WorseBeforeBetter Oct 2013 #315
This one was a real DUzy too! By: You guessed it! Oilwellian Oct 2013 #118
I stand by that thread and still regard anyone in attendance a foolish tool. nt BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #124
I've been advised to self-delete. Can't imagine why. (Snort) Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #129
Yeah someone wants you to help them save face now. Rex Oct 2013 #135
Definitely, you aren't the one who needs to self-delete in this thread. On the other hand, the spin- quinnox Oct 2013 #141
I bet you have Oilwellian Oct 2013 #147
I'm holding up a mirror and their is zero reflection Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #156
Yes this is Animal Farm and some of us are more important or our opinions Rex Oct 2013 #164
That thread has a smackdown with Barney Frank: joshcryer Oct 2013 #152
"Don't ever protest because LaRouche people might show up" Chathamization Oct 2013 #320
I can attest our local nut was not from the Lyndon LaRouche organization nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #334
Uh..... ourfuneral Oct 2013 #143
New Senators always say stuff like that Recursion Oct 2013 #151
Work with him? DeSwiss Oct 2013 #167
Horrible, terrible! The experts on DU said Libertarians and Dems should Rex Oct 2013 #169
The only irony here are those jumping on bipartisanship. joshcryer Oct 2013 #175
Nice try but fail, the point was made to the obvious two faced stance Rex Oct 2013 #179
Read post #27. joshcryer Oct 2013 #180
Don't be mad bro. Rex Oct 2013 #184
Hey, you support Democrats working with the right wing. joshcryer Oct 2013 #187
Hey I don't really care much if your friends got caught up in a lie. Rex Oct 2013 #191
The narrative change was swift indeed. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #181
SO you think it is okay to work with Libertarians now? Rex Oct 2013 #185
... BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #189
Truth hurts sometimes. Rex Oct 2013 #193
From what I gather, many American laws are created and sponsored by people from both parties LeftishBrit Oct 2013 #192
This thread is a good example of how the "swarm" attacks can sometimes turn into epic fails quinnox Oct 2013 #200
The only fails I see here are supporting bipartisanship... joshcryer Oct 2013 #203
Guess who is self deleting like a mad man now to save face!? Rex Oct 2013 #204
LOL quinnox Oct 2013 #206
I was going to bed...will have to wait until the laughing dies down. Rex Oct 2013 #208
heh heh, well, I was in bed, and something was calling me back to DU... quinnox Oct 2013 #210
Scrubbing Bubbles does most of the work, anyway. Stay up late and live a little. nt BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #212
Nah, going to bed. I am sure you were being honest Rex Oct 2013 #216
+!!!! Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #224
I haven't read anything as funny as this thread in days, possibly weeks Fumesucker Oct 2013 #223
I'll have a smile when I go to sleep... Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #225
there is a big difference between trying to get a current Senator's vote and working with Teabaggers JI7 Oct 2013 #226
and every fucking libertarian i know of is a racist JI7 Oct 2013 #227
So you're saying that Corey Booker is working with a racist? Fumesucker Oct 2013 #228
yes, just like FDR did, just like Obama tries to in order to get shit done JI7 Oct 2013 #230
So you are saying it's OK to agree with Libertarians sometimes on some issues? Fumesucker Oct 2013 #235
depends, if they are Senator their vote matters in whether something will pass JI7 Oct 2013 #240
... bullwinkle428 Oct 2013 #259
You should call up Booker and let him know... Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #229
he is going to be Senator so he will have to deal with Racists to get things done JI7 Oct 2013 #231
Just like OP dealt with homophobes to get things done. joshcryer Oct 2013 #233
He will learn the hard way the same as Obama did. Some people can't be worked with. appleannie1 Oct 2013 #232
that's why it's important to defeat these assholes during election time JI7 Oct 2013 #234
I say work with whomever you have to Blue_In_AK Oct 2013 #238
I agree. And I also agree that it is a good thing for liberals to unite with Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #242
Because politicians in a democracy must not work with other politicians? intaglio Oct 2013 #244
I dislike the crying extremist on both sides beachbum bob Oct 2013 #247
^ Thread win. ucrdem Oct 2013 #251
Welcome to DU! Fumesucker Oct 2013 #253
ive seen enough of these threads beachbum bob Oct 2013 #288
The intent was to smoke out hypocrites Fumesucker Oct 2013 #296
Rand Paul is NOT Libertarian. nt Demo_Chris Oct 2013 #255
Ohhhhhhh myyyyyyy! Nice catch Luminous! Pholus Oct 2013 #256
I expect better of you. joshcryer Oct 2013 #266
What an enchanting thread. Going to have to rec and bookmark Autumn Oct 2013 #262
Really an amazing thread, it has it all, hypocrisy, a nattering centrist self deleting and yet Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #263
Unsupportable. joshcryer Oct 2013 #265
What, josh, you didn't read this thread? Your personal attack aside, I expect you to at least Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #307
Performance art is so underappreciated these days n/t Fumesucker Oct 2013 #324
+1 Marr Oct 2013 #269
Oh noes! You is making them madz and sadz! Rex Oct 2013 #272
They get bitey when the chagrin kicks in. Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #312
I commend you on the first reply in which you stay on topic and don't play the victim. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #311
You've been here 23 days. WorseBeforeBetter Oct 2013 #313
This message was self-deleted by its author BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #314
Is this before or after Paul tries to overturn the Civil Rights Act of 1964?? Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #271
Maybe Rand Paul will work with Booker on this ProSense Oct 2013 #275
K&R for pissing off all the Right people! Rex Oct 2013 #273
VA-Gov: Rand Paul (R. KY) Coming To Virginia To Beg Libertarians To Back Ken Cuccinelli (R) ProSense Oct 2013 #274
Pass the smelling salts nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #278
Let me add, this is a really ammusing thread nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #280
This was great! Best hour of my time in a long time, just reading this. bravenak Oct 2013 #282
Yup nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #285
I guess Senator Booker likes the Oathkeepers. NuclearDem Oct 2013 #289
Booker must hate blacks, yup, that's it nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #291
fuck that you can't work with an ass clown like Paul gopiscrap Oct 2013 #292
"sincere people" yeah right DiverDave Oct 2013 #317
You, sir, are naive, if you think everyone in the Senate is sincere. alarimer Oct 2013 #321
Amazingly foolish. True Blue Door Oct 2013 #322
Political arsonist! Yes! Perfect! Rex Oct 2013 #327
Somehow, I have a feeling this won't end well.....Paul is NOT to be trusted.....nt AverageJoe90 Oct 2013 #332
Cory Booker isn't a real Democrat anyway. nt duffyduff Oct 2013 #333
Good for Booker! His political job requires him to talk to all manner of batshizz crazy asshats, struggle4progress Oct 2013 #335
Fuck deranged Rand Paul. HappyMe Oct 2013 #342
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrat Cory Booker want...»Reply #294