Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

questionseverything

(12,065 posts)
43. nyt lied even after they knew okeefe was not dressed as a pimp
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:54 AM
Oct 2013
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7689

Though both the video and statements from ACORN employees were cited as evidence their story was right, Brock would refuse to share evidence for either of the claims. That, even after an independent report from the former Attorney General of Massachusetts --- released in early December, but never mentioned in the Times' recent report (or any report at the paper to my knowledge) --- directly contradicts their reportage....


In short, the Times suggested in an article a week ago Sunday --- and at least seven others prior to it, all published after the release of the former MA Attorney General's report --- that O'Keefe was wearing his infamous pimp outfit inside the offices of ACORN while speaking to employees in his now-infamous hit videos. In actuality, according to the December 7th report by AG Scott Harshbarger, in direct contradiction to the Times reporting, he was not.

As Harshbarger writes:

Although Mr. O'Keefe appeared in all videos dressed as a pimp, in fact, when he appeared at each and every office, he was dressed like a college student - in slacks and a button down shirt.
Instead of acknowledging the Times' error, and the fact that the "paper of record" never seems to have even reported the findings of the Harshbarger report at all, the remarkable email thread with Brock, published in full below, devolves into absurdity. He went on to suggest he didn't actually speak for the Times; that his comments on their behalf in reply to a Letter to the Editor should not be published publicly;

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Let's hope not. madamesilverspurs Oct 2013 #1
I Hear Ya... Yet Here's The Problem... WillyT Oct 2013 #5
I know what you are saying but where can I get real news? You are concerned that GG will slant rhett o rick Oct 2013 #13
So true. If he is going to rely on donations for his 'journalism' Whisp Oct 2013 #41
LOL Egnever Oct 2013 #2
I predict there will be a lot of crow eating by certain critics. I wonder how many will own adirondacker Oct 2013 #3
Amy Goodman has about the most Cleita Oct 2013 #8
I hope they both become the new "mainstream". :) adirondacker Oct 2013 #10
Amy is really good LittleBlue Oct 2013 #45
I was encouraged to hear that Jeremy Scahill is in on this venture n/t deutsey Oct 2013 #50
um...My criticisms of Greenwald still stand Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #19
Very excited to see the new media venture funded by the ebay mega money dude quinnox Oct 2013 #4
It's a good exchange. I hope people take the time to read it Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #6
K&R for G.G.! MNBrewer Oct 2013 #7
... BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #9
Can't be any worse than what we already have 1000words Oct 2013 #11
You'd be surprised at how much worse it could potentially get Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #17
K&R The new venture is EXCELLENT news for America. woo me with science Oct 2013 #12
A surprisingly good read... Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #14
He advocates a more "activist, more partisan journalsim". I think that's the biggest okaawhatever Oct 2013 #15
Snowden went to Greenwald first with the story because he liked Greenwald's work muriel_volestrangler Oct 2013 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Oct 2013 #22
That is not the information I have. Gellman was working with Poitras very early on. She asked for okaawhatever Oct 2013 #27
Gellman was only involved around the beginning of May muriel_volestrangler Oct 2013 #32
He may not be the future of "news", bvar22 Oct 2013 #16
+ 1,000,000,000... What You Said !!! WillyT Oct 2013 #20
Exactly. It isn't ideal. But neither is fascism. BlueStreak Oct 2013 #55
the future of news? madrchsod Oct 2013 #21
Well... Locally... The Sacramento Bee Looks Like A Pamphlet These Days... WillyT Oct 2013 #24
It won't ever happen, but if you wanted ONE magic bullet Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #30
Definitely the line between news, opinion, and entertainment have blurred. goldent Oct 2013 #23
A most excellent exchange of letters expressing their points of view, having said that Uncle Joe Oct 2013 #25
Love Ya Uncle Joe !!! WillyT Oct 2013 #26
Likewise, WillyT. Uncle Joe Oct 2013 #28
Hypothetically speaking, would you still agree with the position Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Oct 2013 #33
Who do you believe damaged ACORN the worst, Brietbart or the "non-subjective" corporate media; Uncle Joe Oct 2013 #38
nyt lied even after they knew okeefe was not dressed as a pimp questionseverything Oct 2013 #43
Good...So when or where did Greenwald ever "disclose" Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #59
If you really wanted to know all it takes is Google and you could find it. Uncle Joe Oct 2013 #61
Uncle Joe... I'd Just Like To Say... You're The Best !!! WillyT Oct 2013 #62
That is an excellent post. Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #63
The future is unknown... Rex Oct 2013 #29
rock n roll is straight from hell! KG Oct 2013 #49
Ok, this is fully. nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #34
If he is, we're fucked...nt SidDithers Oct 2013 #35
Greenwald will destroy the world! Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #47
I don't think Bozo was one of the Four Horsemen...nt SidDithers Oct 2013 #48
You always have so little to say Shampoyeto Oct 2013 #51
Two weeks in and you've got me all figured out... SidDithers Oct 2013 #54
Two weeks typing one-liners is way too much Shampoyeto Oct 2013 #58
repeat customer? vaht? dionysus Oct 2013 #60
from the article questionseverything Oct 2013 #36
THANK YOU !!! WillyT Oct 2013 #37
No: DRUDGE covered that niche. n/t UTUSN Oct 2013 #39
Hope not. randome Oct 2013 #40
Buried on page 6. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #42
good exchange RainDog Oct 2013 #44
No. Chan790 Oct 2013 #46
The future of RW Libertarian "news", at best. tridim Oct 2013 #52
They need a solid gate-keeper Hutzpa Oct 2013 #53
I certainly hope not. MineralMan Oct 2013 #56
$200 million seems like a lot lordsummerisle Oct 2013 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is Glenn Greenwald the Fu...»Reply #43