Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's not fair. surrealAmerican Oct 2013 #1
It isn't. Puzzledtraveller Oct 2013 #2
I don't believe anyone has said that it is is fair. ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #3
They factor in lots of unfair shit, I think... penultimate Oct 2013 #4
Actually, about 95 percent of them use your credit score now. Fawke Em Oct 2013 #53
There's not a single long-term agreement in the world now that doesn't look at your credit score Recursion Oct 2013 #58
Employers that look at credits scores baffle me the most.. penultimate Oct 2013 #71
Same here. I mean, bank teller or something I get Recursion Oct 2013 #75
This message was self-deleted by its author Glassunion Oct 2013 #99
I'd like to know too.... beerandjesus Oct 2013 #5
If they pass the Equal Rights Amendment rating up men will stop. DURHAM D Oct 2013 #6
+1 gollygee Oct 2013 #7
^^ Win (nt) Recursion Oct 2013 #60
ERA should have been passed yesterday Kurska Oct 2013 #91
+1000 ismnotwasm Oct 2013 #92
Insurance is about management of risk. Health care should be about *care*. moriah Oct 2013 #8
I am a man, ergo I will be charged more for auto insurance more than a female. Kurska Oct 2013 #11
No, it's not fair, especially given the mandatory nature of liability auto insurance. moriah Oct 2013 #16
It's not one bit speculative. It's based on national/state driving arrest and conviction statistics. ancianita Oct 2013 #62
What I mean is, insurance is in the business of trying to make money by managing risk. moriah Oct 2013 #65
The math supports the argument that they can make money, yes. It also shows who should pay it. ancianita Oct 2013 #68
Correction, there's lots of good math behind both. moriah Oct 2013 #73
As a woman, don't be quick to hand over your money, since state and national stats are not unfair. ancianita Oct 2013 #78
They're based on traditional gender stereotypes ... Myrina Oct 2013 #9
In my experience, guys got pulled over far more often with me in the car... moriah Oct 2013 #13
It's not based on stereotypes. It's based on statistics. denverbill Oct 2013 #35
No they're absolutely not. You're wrong about the gender stereotype thing. Lots of social stuff is ancianita Oct 2013 #64
No, it's based on statistics, not stereotypes. alarimer Oct 2013 #98
First, because buying auto insurance is only mandated if you CHOOSE to drive a car. djean111 Oct 2013 #10
Tell me how I would go about never "choosing" to drive in the rural south. Kurska Oct 2013 #14
I meant carrying your argument out to a logical conclusion. djean111 Oct 2013 #22
The argument is it is the same argument for both cases Kurska Oct 2013 #36
Because evryone does not drive. djean111 Oct 2013 #38
And not everyone buys health insurance Kurska Oct 2013 #43
Health insurance applies equally because every single one of us WILL NEED HEALTH CARE at some point. ancianita Oct 2013 #66
Every human on this earth spent at least some time IN a uterus. moriah Oct 2013 #85
Too bad. Statistics of car-related crime by gender put the lie to your claims. See my other post ancianita Oct 2013 #57
what about life insurance? MattBaggins Oct 2013 #100
How very un-Democratic of you joeglow3 Oct 2013 #30
In the reality of today's world, yes. djean111 Oct 2013 #37
"the ideal car insurance would be single-payer" ding ding, we have a winner. Kurska Oct 2013 #45
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2013 #12
And women require more healthcare Kurska Oct 2013 #15
Gender is not something you can choose MissMillie Oct 2013 #19
I disagree, I've known people who simply shouldn't drive Fumesucker Oct 2013 #40
I think I'm safe enough with four wheels, but not two. moriah Oct 2013 #52
In mercuryblues Oct 2013 #17
It's not fair Politicalboi Oct 2013 #18
It depends on what your concept of "Insurance" is ...... oldhippie Oct 2013 #20
Health and auto insurance aren't comparable BainsBane Oct 2013 #21
Eh, transportation is kind of essential to work, which is pretty essential to live. moriah Oct 2013 #25
I personally resent having to have auto insurance at all BainsBane Oct 2013 #26
So if you are responsible for an accident in which I am injured and/or my car is damaged, djean111 Oct 2013 #33
You have recourse to the courts BainsBane Oct 2013 #46
What if I cannot afford a lawyer? What if you have nothing to take? djean111 Oct 2013 #47
In a just society, you would be permitted to ...... oldhippie Oct 2013 #69
We pay uninsured motorist coverage, don't we? BainsBane Oct 2013 #74
You don't have to have auto insurance, even to drive on public roads ..... oldhippie Oct 2013 #70
This message was self-deleted by its author BainsBane Oct 2013 #86
i am insuring a 16 and 18 yr old. nto fair. lets end it today. nt seabeyond Oct 2013 #23
Insurance companies mercuryblues Oct 2013 #24
husband totalled two vehicles 19 yrs, son one, i none... just a second, gotta knock on some wood... seabeyond Oct 2013 #27
you should see our rates mercuryblues Oct 2013 #42
My parent's are going through that with my little brother penultimate Oct 2013 #76
OMG... lol, ya. all this. my oldest gets no more chances. two. any more, he is off. seabeyond Oct 2013 #79
Insurance companies also set rates based on geography liberal N proud Oct 2013 #28
Our rates dropped in half when we moved from Maryland madinmaryland Oct 2013 #80
We were in northern Missouri, but yes liberal N proud Oct 2013 #87
I see. I assume you would be in the Cleveland area, which would be higher than even madinmaryland Oct 2013 #96
Yep liberal N proud Oct 2013 #103
Our daughter wanted to get out of the driving class at school... cynatnite Oct 2013 #31
Insurance companies, whether health or auto, will underwrite policies based on whatever the law is. denverbill Oct 2013 #29
I'd not object to mandatory liability coverage up to state limits being made gender-neutral. moriah Oct 2013 #48
Two parts jeff47 Oct 2013 #32
"Fair" isn't the issue. lumberjack_jeff Oct 2013 #34
Because ACA doesn't apply to auto insurance. GeorgeGist Oct 2013 #39
Car insurance rates are based on statistical risk. Young males have/cause sinkingfeeling Oct 2013 #41
Why is it fair for people under 25 to pay more for auto insurance? Performance. MADem Oct 2013 #44
Thank you. :) moriah Oct 2013 #49
And it's about US, too! Those "kids" are gonna be wiping our asses and serving us our pudding if MADem Oct 2013 #50
they'll say it's because they get into more accidents gopiscrap Oct 2013 #51
I tell you what: work with us for a nationwide non-profit public auto insurance regime Recursion Oct 2013 #54
It's totally fair. You just haven't bothered to find out why. ancianita Oct 2013 #55
Because a lot of young men do really stupid shit in cars NickB79 Oct 2013 #56
And that's just the high visibility stuff. nt ancianita Oct 2013 #59
It's a carry over from the 'dark days' of the horseless carriage............. wandy Oct 2013 #61
It isn't. n/t pnwmom Oct 2013 #63
Do we really want our health insurance to be based on actuarial tables? cbayer Oct 2013 #67
Actuarial tables and FBI crime stats are maps of reality. Knowing reality is a good thing. ancianita Oct 2013 #72
Even more reason why they should pay more when it comes to car insurance, imo. cbayer Oct 2013 #81
Amen to that. ancianita Oct 2013 #84
i dont think it is fair but it is also not a good comparison to health insurance. nt La Lioness Priyanka Oct 2013 #77
Well... Ohio Joe Oct 2013 #82
I suppose if younger guys' driving behavior Ilsa Oct 2013 #83
My driving record is fine, yet I still pay more. Kurska Oct 2013 #90
Based on data that states men are at a higher risk of being in a car accident? Rex Oct 2013 #88
Your argument is flawed. procon Oct 2013 #89
Men can't choose the gender they are born with either, buddy. Kurska Oct 2013 #93
It's a matter of statistics, not gender. procon Oct 2013 #97
Proven risk profiles. bluestate10 Oct 2013 #94
What are you asking us for? Nine Oct 2013 #95
It's not fair. Cleita Oct 2013 #101
Simple answer... Because it's fair. Glassunion Oct 2013 #102
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is it fair for men to...»Reply #60