Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
57. Here is everything...
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 06:42 PM
Oct 2013

3.Enter annual income (dollars)?
4.Is employer coverage available??
5.Number of people in family?
6.Number of adults (21 and older) enrolling in exchange coverage
Age? Uses Tobacco? ?
Age? Uses Tobacco?
7.Number of children (20 and younger) enrolling in exchange coverage

results
Because your income is more than 400% of the poverty level, you would not qualify for subsidized exchange coverage. The information below is about unsubsidized exchange coverage.

Household income in 2014:406% of poverty levelMaximum % of income you have to pay for the non-tobacco premium, if eligible for a subsidy:None Health Insurance premium in 2014 (for a silver plan, before tax credit):$6,449 per year You could receive a government tax credit subsidy of up to:$0 per year
(which covers 0% of the overall premium) Amount you pay for the premium:$6,449 per year
(which equals 10.24% of your household income and covers 100% of the overall premium)
OTHER LEVELS OF COVERAGE

The premium amounts above are based on a Silver plan. You could purchase other levels of coverage, such as a Gold plan (which would be more comprehensive) or a Bronze plan (which would be less comprehensive).

For example, you could enroll in a Bronze plan for about $4,772 per year (which is 7.57% of your household income). For most people, the Bronze plan represents the minimum level of coverage required under health reform. Although you would pay less in premiums by enrolling in a Bronze plan, you will face higher out-of-pocket costs than if you enrolled in a Silver plan.

OUT OF POCKET COSTS

Your out-of-pocket maximum for a Silver plan (not including the premium) can be no more than $12,700. Whether you reach this maximum level will depend on the amount of health care services you use. Currently, about one in four people use no health care services in any given year.

A Silver plan has an actuarial value of 70%. This means that for all enrollees in a typical population, the plan will pay for 70% of expenses in total for covered benefits, with enrollees responsible for the rest. If you choose to enroll in a Bronze plan, the actuarial value will be 60%, meaning your out-of-pocket costs when you use services will likely be higher. Regardless of which level of coverage you choose, deductibles and copayments will vary from plan to plan, and out-of-pocket costs will depend on your health care expenses. Preventive services will be covered with no cost sharing required.

OTHER COVERAGE OPTIONS

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #1
And for many in the stupid states that refused to expand Medicaid. PeaceNikki Oct 2013 #2
Did some states that did not start their own exchanges expand medicaid Puzzledtraveller Oct 2013 #6
WI did neither. I think some states refused expansion and did set up exchanges (I think KY?). PeaceNikki Oct 2013 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #10
$50 a month for crap insurance that caps out at $2000 is not having Insurance... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #3
ACA establishes floor by setting policy standards Skidmore Oct 2013 #9
they were going to get Sticker Stroke if they saw the bill for a major illness without healthcare. VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #18
I am near that age...live in a major city (with rents as high as that) and make that much myself. VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #24
I did put it in for 2 people! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #50
its NOT on gross income.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #30
thats how much I put in! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #33
Yes Kaiser... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #54
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #56
Here is everything... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #61
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #39
You DON"T Itemize with the standard deduction! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #47
that is NOT what I am reading... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #49
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #59
After FICA? VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #65
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #72
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #53
and I have no idea what YOU are talking about...I am posting my results... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #28
Please stop saying that. It is wrong BlueStreak Oct 2013 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #35
It is NOT on gross income! VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #43
Nope for 2 people...calculated that in... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #51
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #44
Yes, you are still wrong. It is gross income BlueStreak Oct 2013 #45
no it is not.... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #46
Please stop doing this. You are confusing others. BlueStreak Oct 2013 #58
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #63
So then you are saying AGI IS the same as Gross? VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #64
It looks like a fair deal. BlueStreak Oct 2013 #73
I readily admit there is plenty of room for improvement... VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #74
I get that, but one person's "freaking out" is another person's ... BlueStreak Oct 2013 #75
I see it totally different....if you were paying attention to anywhere but DU you will see there is VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #76
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #62
People are afraid they will have to pay more. Puzzledtraveller Oct 2013 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #36
I always thought the message was more then clear... Ohio Joe Oct 2013 #7
People believed the President and now you are being critical of them for doing so? Demo_Chris Oct 2013 #21
Well, to be fair, it the GOP wasn't talking about Death Panels and insurance fairies BlueStreak Oct 2013 #41
It wasn't a 'likely' scenario, it was a GIVEN. Demo_Chris Oct 2013 #79
I don't think it was a given in the context of 2009 BlueStreak Oct 2013 #81
Not to quibble, but any time you issue blanket guarantees you are gonna get burned... Demo_Chris Oct 2013 #82
I don't think there has been any deception about the mandate BlueStreak Oct 2013 #83
The fine is not as small as you think... Demo_Chris Oct 2013 #85
It is not a big fine. BlueStreak Oct 2013 #88
$400 Per person in that family during the first year. Demo_Chris Oct 2013 #89
So they should take the Bronze policy BlueStreak Oct 2013 #90
That's certainly one answer... Demo_Chris Oct 2013 #92
We need to emphasize personal responsibility. That is what this is all about. BlueStreak Oct 2013 #94
In will be interesting to see how this turns out. nt Demo_Chris Oct 2013 #97
And re: the bronze policy, it is the same high-quality insurance as the Platinum BlueStreak Oct 2013 #95
And that, my friend, can be all the difference in the world... Demo_Chris Oct 2013 #96
It is still far better then the prior situation BlueStreak Oct 2013 #98
We have individual onlyadream Oct 2013 #68
Too many words. "Americans love cheap" would have sufficed. Xithras Oct 2013 #11
These are people who used to get their highs off the baggies of oregano sold on Washington Square PeaceNikki Oct 2013 #12
Well shit. Who wants to pay more than the Canadians, the Germans, the French, etc? NoOneMan Oct 2013 #17
there are many "rugged individualists" who are in denial about their true motives Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #13
Or, with the caps on profits, it will organically lower as a result of a bigger/healthier pool? PeaceNikki Oct 2013 #14
I think they will need to also actively work on lowering typical health care costs Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #16
insurance has bargaining power to negotiate lower rates IronLionZion Oct 2013 #80
Happy to K&R. So glad my son's "insurance" is part of the canceled crap. ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #15
I am so very happy that ACA is helping you, me and many others I know. PeaceNikki Oct 2013 #19
Many = 1% zipplewrath Oct 2013 #22
Yes, I think this one is going to leave a mark. HereSince1628 Oct 2013 #23
Our cancelled plan was NOT crappy nor cheap econoclast Oct 2013 #27
So has it been your policy to always employ only those beyond child-bearing age? PeaceNikki Oct 2013 #38
I've worked with these folks for 20 years! econoclast Oct 2013 #42
Yeah, obviously I can't know all of that, nor does it really matter. PeaceNikki Oct 2013 #52
Real backbreaker is DOCTORS! econoclast Oct 2013 #67
And Nikki. By the way ... econoclast Oct 2013 #70
You don't have to be condescending. Read the rest of my reply. PeaceNikki Oct 2013 #71
I feel for you... I was thunderously assaulted for sharing my similar story a few weeks back... ReverendDeuce Oct 2013 #66
But you must be a troll onlyadream Oct 2013 #69
Or it must be my JUNK POLICY... that paid $80K in medical bills in 2011... n/t ReverendDeuce Oct 2013 #86
And you finally indicated you make too much to qualify for a subsidy. And still your premium isn't stevenleser Oct 2013 #84
Premium went from $160 to $234, co-pay/deductibles went WAY up... So what if I don't get a subsidy? ReverendDeuce Oct 2013 #87
I would characterize your situation as a win for the ACA. You can try to spin in how you want. nt stevenleser Oct 2013 #91
A win!? A win for the insurance cartels, maybe... As far as I am concerned, this sucks! n/t ReverendDeuce Oct 2013 #93
+1, but I would state it a little differently BlueStreak Oct 2013 #29
Certainly NOT true for us econoclast Oct 2013 #34
Nice try, Doktor Zoom BKH70041 Oct 2013 #48
plans DustyJoe Oct 2013 #60
That's not 100% true. Glassunion Oct 2013 #77
I am less interested in the out of pocket max than I am about first dollar coverage. Bozvotros Oct 2013 #78
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama's "You can kee...»Reply #57