General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Nov. 22, 1963: 50 years, and still no conspiracy|Op Ed LA Times [View all]Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)It is a natural assumption to think you shared in the author's slander of RFK. If you do not, state so clearly that you don't. I cannot for the life of me understand why you would not say clearly what you think of RFK as an accessory to his brother's murder.
I've searched this thread and the other up and down. I cannot find where you have stated one way or the other what you think on the matter in so many words. I can see where you have posted the article that smeared him - twice!. I can see where you have commended the author to us - twice! But I cannot see where you have disavowed that huge section of the article where the author condemns Robert Kennedy as an accessory to his brother's murder. Do you believe this or do you not?
This question isn't hard, Octafish. If you do not, I would be happy to apologize to you for saying you did, because it's an awful thing to say about someone. And though I said it with all the reason in the world to think it, I would still apologize to you.
But if you DO think RFK was an accessory after the fact to his brother's murder just as that author said, what silly game are you playing at to say I've distorted your words or ascribed to you a belief you do not have - if in fact you do have it?