Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

rsmith6621

(6,942 posts)

1. Not to mention

Reply to limpyhobbler (Original post)

Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:32 AM

Mar 2012

how large of an area can the SS designate as the grounds at a political function,could be the entire city in reality ..... Our Occupy Group went to 2 US Sen and 2 US Reps office today and made a request for clarification.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What do you think of this article about HR 347 (Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds etc...) ? [View all] limpyhobbler Mar 2012 OP

Not to mention rsmith6621 Mar 2012 #1

That's really cool. limpyhobbler Mar 2012 #4

Not unless you want to evacuate the city. jeff47 Mar 2012 #6

He fails with this sentence: jeff47 Mar 2012 #2

Hi. Could you please quote the part of H.R. 137 law that requires a clear demarcation? Luminous Animal Mar 2012 #3

Hrm...this giant fence around the White House. I'll just hop on over and start picking flowers jeff47 Mar 2012 #5

or otherwise restricted area. So no, it does not need to a clearly demarcated area. Luminous Animal Mar 2012 #13

According to the Justice Department, it does. jeff47 Mar 2012 #16

If I understand you correctly, limpyhobbler Mar 2012 #8

In an area restricted by this law, yes. jeff47 Mar 2012 #9

What is an "otherwise restricted area"? limpyhobbler Mar 2012 #10

It's a generic catch-all so they don't have to list all the ways to do it. jeff47 Mar 2012 #12

Do you know whether this law only applies to areas restricted by the Secret Service? limpyhobbler Mar 2012 #14

It requires the Secret Service jeff47 Mar 2012 #15

it's unconstitutional, of course Warpy Mar 2012 #7

You might be interested in this analysis jeff47 Mar 2012 #11