Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
16. Too bad he didn't express those opinions when he was running for office.
Wed Oct 30, 2013, 01:30 PM
Oct 2013

He would not have been elected. How about Democrats start 'spouting' the truth instead of 'talking points'?

How about they start demanding cuts to what has really caused the country's financial problems.

The only elected official I hear actually addressing the FACTS is Bernie Sanders. If he can tell the truth, why can't this guy? There is no excuse for 'spouting' damaging 'talking points', absolutely none. Doing so is what cause the lies to continue to spread.

Is it too much to simply ask them to do what is right now?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

done gopiscrap Oct 2013 #1
I have their offices in my contacts list n/t hootinholler Oct 2013 #2
put http://votesmart.org in your bookmarks bar nashville_brook Oct 2013 #9
K&R woo me with science Oct 2013 #3
I don't think so... DonViejo Oct 2013 #4
More patience is required. AnotherMcIntosh Oct 2013 #6
Where in that message that you posted BumRushDaShow Oct 2013 #5
You say, he is "spouting the existing Democratic talking points about a 'balance'." A good thing? AnotherMcIntosh Oct 2013 #7
Too bad he didn't express those opinions when he was running for office. sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #16
Actually, he is a part of the joint committee hootinholler Oct 2013 #18
Fix The Debt people have been out in force for a week now nashville_brook Oct 2013 #8
Weird how Social Security was safe during the 2008 and 2012 campaigns. Octafish Oct 2013 #12
yes in-f'n-deedy. time they got serious about raising revenue. nashville_brook Oct 2013 #13
But the deficit......it's for the long-term health of the budget... Octafish Oct 2013 #10
The sequester rendered any "grand bargain" idea moot Recursion Oct 2013 #11
Then why are we not hearing Dems coming out strongly, like say, sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #17
Harry Reid said no grand bargain, no SS cuts. Did you miss that? nt geek tragedy Oct 2013 #19
Yes, I did miss it. The last I heard, Harry Reid was talking about sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #21
You'll enjoy this: geek tragedy Oct 2013 #22
Hey, Reid quoted ME! lol! sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #23
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Oct 2013 #14
Raising revenue on the 1-2%ers ain't gonna happen Iliyah Oct 2013 #15
Grand Bargain is dead for the next 18 months. geek tragedy Oct 2013 #20
the teabaggers have already said no tax increases period, magical thyme Oct 2013 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Grand Bargain is in p...»Reply #16