General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I Spent 5 Years in Solitary For Non-Violent, Absurd Infractions Like Having Too Many Postage Stamps [View all]JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Last edited Thu Oct 31, 2013, 04:10 PM - Edit history (1)
They would have to be tried for any actual new crime committed while in prison.
If a state is going to, first of all, allow Solitary Confinment in facilities outside the general population, and secondly, allow it for ridiculous offenses like having too many art supplies or not eating an apple, and thirdly, allow these inhumane lengths of time in SC, and lastly, in conditions that are designed to psychologically torture the prisoner, then YES there MUST be outside review of each case.
ETA: The review would be to determine if SC is even justified. You focused on the judge imposing possibly longer time lengths than the guards do. My point is, the judge would never allow most of these SC punishments to occur in the first place. And a state law severely limiting the amount of time a prisoner could be placed in SC would take care of that problem in any case