Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)If not Hillary, Who? [View all]
Look, I'm new here, so please excuse my boldness, but Secretary Clinton is the only choice for '16. Hey, I love Joe Biden: He's the most underrated and underappreciated member of the Administration. He would have forced Harry Reid to punt any "gentleman's agreement" on the filibuster, and his "Counterintelligence backed by Special Ops rather than Boots on the Ground" approach to foreign policy is spot-on. But he'll be 73 on Election Day. Hillary will be 69, and we all know that women live longer than men. Clinton II will be a kick-ass/take names/no prisoners president and we all know that.
O'Malley and Cuomo can wait their turns with Warren. Hillary Rodham Clinton for President!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
102 replies, 14567 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
102 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A "campaign in waiting", my ass. It's a propaganda campaign, intended to intimidate
winter is coming
Nov 2013
#72
In case you haven't noticed, everyone's popularity has gone down. People are sick of politicians.
Beacool
Nov 2013
#86
Elizabeth Warren would make an excellent candidate. She thinks well on her feet and
bluestate10
Oct 2013
#7
She said she is not running and has endorsed Hillary so she is not an option. nt
stevenleser
Oct 2013
#43
You mean we shouldn't expect the person touted as true to their values to be just that?
stevenleser
Nov 2013
#65
I am a huge Hillary fan, but I don't understand the need to call it for her now...
cynatnite
Oct 2013
#8
I don't think a focus on the White House is why the GOP does so well at midterms...
bobclark86
Nov 2013
#48
Don't forget their young white offspring who I bet couldn't even name the last 5 prez & VPs nt
Laura PourMeADrink
Nov 2013
#102
I can only think of 3 people in Congress that carry themselves like candidates...
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Oct 2013
#35
The Republicans are not likely to offer a candidate that sensible people can vote for.
JDPriestly
Oct 2013
#34
Clinton II will be a kick-ass/take names/no prisoners president and we all know that.
DonCoquixote
Oct 2013
#29
You must have half of DU on ignore if you believe "we all know that". n/t
winter is coming
Nov 2013
#55
Warren's good. Unlike Clinton, she's an intellectual titan, progressive and people *like* her.
Smarmie Doofus
Oct 2013
#40
For starters? How about someone who's not an Old Rich White Establishment Person?
cherokeeprogressive
Nov 2013
#47
...and the progressives have MONTHS to sit behind their computers complaining...
brooklynite
Nov 2013
#93
We don't have to go dredging the same lakes for the same tired candidates you know.
ScreamingMeemie
Nov 2013
#61
a populist liberal such as Warren or Sanders, and I don't give a damn if people think they don't
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2013
#74