Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If not Hillary, Who? [View all]Courtesy Flush
(4,558 posts)25. Anybody who remembers the '90s knows
that Hillary has been baptized by fire. She's been through the Limbaugh meat grinder, and survived. At this point, she can't be swift boated, and there can't be any bombshells left to fall.
Sadly, this is a major factor. More important than whether she is the best candidate.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
102 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A "campaign in waiting", my ass. It's a propaganda campaign, intended to intimidate
winter is coming
Nov 2013
#72
In case you haven't noticed, everyone's popularity has gone down. People are sick of politicians.
Beacool
Nov 2013
#86
Elizabeth Warren would make an excellent candidate. She thinks well on her feet and
bluestate10
Oct 2013
#7
She said she is not running and has endorsed Hillary so she is not an option. nt
stevenleser
Oct 2013
#43
You mean we shouldn't expect the person touted as true to their values to be just that?
stevenleser
Nov 2013
#65
I am a huge Hillary fan, but I don't understand the need to call it for her now...
cynatnite
Oct 2013
#8
I don't think a focus on the White House is why the GOP does so well at midterms...
bobclark86
Nov 2013
#48
Don't forget their young white offspring who I bet couldn't even name the last 5 prez & VPs nt
Laura PourMeADrink
Nov 2013
#102
I can only think of 3 people in Congress that carry themselves like candidates...
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Oct 2013
#35
The Republicans are not likely to offer a candidate that sensible people can vote for.
JDPriestly
Oct 2013
#34
Clinton II will be a kick-ass/take names/no prisoners president and we all know that.
DonCoquixote
Oct 2013
#29
You must have half of DU on ignore if you believe "we all know that". n/t
winter is coming
Nov 2013
#55
Warren's good. Unlike Clinton, she's an intellectual titan, progressive and people *like* her.
Smarmie Doofus
Oct 2013
#40
For starters? How about someone who's not an Old Rich White Establishment Person?
cherokeeprogressive
Nov 2013
#47
...and the progressives have MONTHS to sit behind their computers complaining...
brooklynite
Nov 2013
#93
We don't have to go dredging the same lakes for the same tired candidates you know.
ScreamingMeemie
Nov 2013
#61
a populist liberal such as Warren or Sanders, and I don't give a damn if people think they don't
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2013
#74