General Discussion

econoclast

(543 posts)

19. Ok. So round numbers about 300 billion over 3 years

Fri Nov 1, 2013, 10:50 AM

Nov 2013

Where is the 100 billion a year increase in federal govt spending in the chart?

Or did all other levels of government spend virtually nothing during those three years?

Or is there something hinkey with the chart?

Does anybody writing about it link back to the data?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Here's The Chart Of The US Infrastructure Spending Collapse That Everyone Is Talking About [View all] xchrom Nov 2013 OP

K&R! KoKo Nov 2013 #1

When are the elected Democrats going on the Sunday talk shows and start screaming this? DontTreadOnMe Nov 2013 #2

The narrative is set by the corporate-controlled M$M. watoos Nov 2013 #18

...and so your response to this is... nothing? DontTreadOnMe Nov 2013 #29

Democrat on a Sunday Talk show? hootinholler Nov 2013 #20

When they start getting campaign donations from Cement companies rather than military & banking ones Myrina Nov 2013 #22

x2 AnotherMcIntosh Nov 2013 #27

no kidding, but the corporations generally call the shots. gopiscrap Nov 2013 #64

An interesting question- is this due to the ending of earmarks in congress? n2doc Nov 2013 #3

I would say Andy823 Nov 2013 #6

It is not just about "being mean," though. If they can prevent Obama from tblue37 Nov 2013 #37

Earmarks have not ended. Without Congress passing a budget for 3 years.... FogerRox Nov 2013 #40

How much is that new NSA facility ctsnowman Nov 2013 #4

k/r marmar Nov 2013 #5

American Jobs Act bhikkhu Nov 2013 #7

That would make too much sense. maddiemom Nov 2013 #25

Too small of a scale. 6% of gdp is 900 billion-22 million jobs FogerRox Nov 2013 #42

Hang on a minute ... econoclast Nov 2013 #8

The chart includes state and local infrastructure spending groundloop Nov 2013 #11

Is it ONLY state and local? econoclast Nov 2013 #13

War L0oniX Nov 2013 #17

War. n/t ChisolmTrailDem Nov 2013 #47

You DO realize that a full THIRD of that $880 billion was..... socialist_n_TN Nov 2013 #60

the chart has a range of Niceguy1 Nov 2013 #62

frittered away on "qualitative easement"? .. . .n/t annabanana Nov 2013 #12

Shouldn't be. QE Is a Federal Reserve thing. econoclast Nov 2013 #14

isn't it what CNBC means when they say "the Stim"? . ..n/t annabanana Nov 2013 #38

Multiplier for QE is about 1.1, for infrastruture its 2.5. FogerRox Nov 2013 #48

Don't we wish! econoclast Nov 2013 #55

.25 is negative, 1.1 is nearly neutral FogerRox Nov 2013 #58

Most of the Stimulus consisted of unemployment benefits and middle class tax cuts. SunSeeker Nov 2013 #16

Ok. So round numbers about 300 billion over 3 years econoclast Nov 2013 #19

Dunno. Not my chart. Not my OP. nt SunSeeker Nov 2013 #36

They never spent it. Or not all of it at any rate. nt Demo_Chris Nov 2013 #61

175 billion was spent on infraststructure, wee wiki. FogerRox Nov 2013 #46

+1 n/t DanM Nov 2013 #67

+1, there is something very wrong with this chart. Festivito Nov 2013 #26

I suspect the stimulus infrastructure investment was not enough to offset state and local cuts. TheKentuckian Nov 2013 #35

Answers to your questions Jim Lane Nov 2013 #50

Thank you. Nicely said. And, I think I was wrong. Stimulus is there. Festivito Nov 2013 #56

At least the choice of dates is legit econoclast Nov 2013 #54

"on structures" mathematic Nov 2013 #30

Thanks for the link! econoclast Nov 2013 #57

Something is amiss in your numbers FogerRox Nov 2013 #43

Started with Bush but has dramatically dropped under Obama. riderinthestorm Nov 2013 #9

Rethugs are supposed to be whizzes at capitalism. "no political will at Fed govt" - uh TeaBaggers UTUSN Nov 2013 #10

A Pentagon spending chart should be right next to that. L0oniX Nov 2013 #15

+ infinity Vashta Nerada Nov 2013 #24

$8b in the most recent year mathematic Nov 2013 #31

Can't account for what's being spent on the NSA or DHS ....it's a secret. L0oniX Nov 2013 #32

More and more I am convinced they are trying to make us a third world country. zeemike Nov 2013 #21

I think it's a push by special interest for privatization of public assets and services Auggie Nov 2013 #28

That's okay. Vashta Nerada Nov 2013 #23

JESUS. And we wonder why growth is so slow in this country. bullwinkle428 Nov 2013 #33

exactly, we used to spend 5-6% of GDP on infrastructure, recently only 1.6%. FogerRox Nov 2013 #44

Contractors and developers must not have been contributing enough to the right politicians. FarCenter Nov 2013 #34

How can government have the resources to stamp out terra from the face of the earth, exert global indepat Nov 2013 #39

Chart scale needs to be adjusted taught_me_patience Nov 2013 #41

Go back to 1960, its down like 250% FogerRox Nov 2013 #45

Since 1992 FogerRox Nov 2013 #49

Fiscal conservatives always do the wrong things at the wrong times Warpy Nov 2013 #51

They spend spend spend and hate taxes. Rex Nov 2013 #53

IF ONLY everyone was talking about it. elleng Nov 2013 #52

Here in Australia, infrastructure spending was a major priority during the GFC. mattclearing Nov 2013 #59

For whatever reason, the "Powers" Enthusiast Nov 2013 #66

you can just see it gopiscrap Nov 2013 #63

TPTB want the economy and the nation in the tank. Enthusiast Nov 2013 #65