Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(15,271 posts)

5. I don't think "annus horribilis" is the correct term.

Sat Nov 2, 2013, 04:56 AM

Nov 2013

1905 is usually referred to as Einstein's annus mirabilis.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Physicists unify the structure of scientific theories [View all] FarCenter Nov 2013 OP

We are all an illusion? Rex Nov 2013 #1

I knew that! MoonRiver Nov 2013 #7

So primarily focus on the stiff and leave the sloppy for second? Thor_MN Nov 2013 #2

Stiff and sloppy, just how I like, well, never mind. Vashta Nerada Nov 2013 #3

I don't think "annus horribilis" is the correct term. Jim__ Nov 2013 #5

There is nothing worse than an annus horribilis. Orrex Nov 2013 #8

OMG! MoonRiver Nov 2013 #10

I stand corrected. longship Nov 2013 #12

Relabel "relevant and irrelevant" and get published Motown_Johnny Nov 2013 #9

I thought Wolfram had already figured out everything jsr Nov 2013 #11

arxiv paper Bosonic Nov 2013 #13