Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
23. per OP
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 07:48 AM
Nov 2013

I couldn't agree more. More 'bluedogs' to work against progressives in our Party. Stay where you are, reform your own fucked up party of liars, extremists, racists and cheat.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

how many are actually switching? I'm not convinced that it's enough to make any cali Nov 2013 #1
Many others have said that davidpdx Nov 2013 #22
As far as I can see those republicans are coming from blue dog states, and it would be a major lostincalifornia Nov 2013 #2
We cannot prevail without them. That's the hard reality of it. randome Nov 2013 #3
Crist as Gov of Florida does nothing for our Congressional majority and you have to own Bluenorthwest Nov 2013 #24
And you're talking about one case. randome Nov 2013 #29
Exactly. What is now a moderate Republican used to be middle/right Republican. cui bono Nov 2013 #43
But that's the excuse the Republicans used Le Taz Hot Nov 2013 #31
I think the Democrats lost their moxie BECAUSE Republicans expanded so well. randome Nov 2013 #33
I'd rather tell them to fuck off. Chan790 Nov 2013 #38
Except for the last two, I agree with you. randome Nov 2013 #50
+1 nomorenomore08 Nov 2013 #65
when a party represents a majority quaker bill Nov 2013 #4
I know what you mean. postulater Nov 2013 #5
Exactly. treestar Nov 2013 #11
Here is your 'Moderate' Charlie Crist on Palin's superiority to Obama. Bluenorthwest Nov 2013 #25
Short term thinking DireStrike Nov 2013 #21
Chicken or egg? quaker bill Nov 2013 #56
Products of the System...of the Behemoth required to respond to 12 or 13 million voters. Yes. libdem4life Nov 2013 #83
Well said. Captain Stern Nov 2013 #39
I'd rather they stay and pull their own party away from the edge than pull ours more to the right. Scuba Nov 2013 #6
that graphic if true, would only prove there are no voters over there treestar Nov 2013 #12
The graphic represents our elected officials, not the voters. Scuba Nov 2013 #13
You win the day for illogical statements. treestar Nov 2013 #14
The voters, who were offered a choice betwee a right-winger, and a far-right-winger. Scuba Nov 2013 #16
How did that choice come about? treestar Nov 2013 #17
C'mon, you're not really that naive, are you? Scuba Nov 2013 #18
If not naive, I'd hate to think of the alternative. nm rhett o rick Nov 2013 #54
Do you not think voters in the primaries treestar Nov 2013 #58
stop, just stop. lol BootinUp Nov 2013 #82
in serious conversations with the serious people who write serious checks... nashville_brook Nov 2013 #28
So whose fault is that? treestar Nov 2013 #59
You're ignoring the known reality among political scientists... Chan790 Nov 2013 #41
Yes, and I would add to that that as the Dem party's values get more centrist cui bono Nov 2013 #42
Or that the voters chose was they did? treestar Nov 2013 #60
You are wrong on this. I have to guess your point because you choose to rhett o rick Nov 2013 #53
You are making my brain hurt BootinUp Nov 2013 #77
+ a zillion Tents can be TOO big. truebluegreen Nov 2013 #36
^^^^this^^^^ L0oniX Nov 2013 #80
Don't worry RandiFan1290 Nov 2013 #7
Not, they will be a tiny minority treestar Nov 2013 #15
If they will walk across the aisle now and give DEMs a majority in the House, then good. SDjack Nov 2013 #8
It's Part Of Their Plan....... global1 Nov 2013 #9
I would say they've already done that Oilwellian Nov 2013 #27
I don't think the repubs planned it. I think they lost control of the baggers. CrispyQ Nov 2013 #87
Never trust these switchers until they've developed a progressive track record. Period. ancianita Nov 2013 #10
That was my thought too. zeemike Nov 2013 #19
And we're already way to close to that scenario in a presidential race for my comfort. n/t cui bono Nov 2013 #44
Where have you been? TBF Nov 2013 #20
+1. jsr Nov 2013 #35
Hell, Obama is barely a Democrat! I never said he was progressive. cui bono Nov 2013 #46
per OP heaven05 Nov 2013 #23
Until there is some mechanism in place... Blanks Nov 2013 #26
After the (R)s fall apart the (D)s will split too. Motown_Johnny Nov 2013 #30
Why the two party system sucks. wildeyed Nov 2013 #32
Yeah and since the Romney funders are backing dems against the teabaggers they will mucifer Nov 2013 #34
Well, we can have a majority in Congress (by way of a 50-state strategy) Proud Liberal Dem Nov 2013 #37
The first thing many of them do is try to get the Dem party to be more like the republican party. Zorra Nov 2013 #40
You're right, our massive majority in the House means we should stop reject geek tragedy Nov 2013 #45
You had me at "you're right". cui bono Nov 2013 #47
So it's about 'winning' but not about issues them? Here's what we will do sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #67
What you overlook is that they are politicians and will move left after geek tragedy Nov 2013 #68
Oh please, now I trust them even less, if that is true. Anyone sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #69
I trust politicians to behave like politicians. Start from there and you'll predict geek tragedy Nov 2013 #70
I expect Politicians to be ethical and moral. Sorry you sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #71
Politicians get people to vote for them. It's what they do for a living. geek tragedy Nov 2013 #72
This IS a majority left/liberal country. I am not going to continue to sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #73
If this was a majority liberal country, you'd have 40-50% saying Obama is not liberal geek tragedy Nov 2013 #74
Um, this is NOT a country that voted for Bush in 2004! sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #75
Where exactly? IronLionZion Nov 2013 #48
In general. It just seems like every day there's another Republican switching because of the crazies cui bono Nov 2013 #49
yup gopiscrap Nov 2013 #51
just plain stupid to say this beachbum bob Nov 2013 #52
I'll take a Progressive Democrat over any Republican, moderate or sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #66
Thank you. nt dflprincess Nov 2013 #55
No kidding DJ13 Nov 2013 #57
i want enough to switch to take the speakers gavel away from Boehner scheming daemons Nov 2013 #61
They should stay in their own party and try to reign in the extremists. sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #62
Yep. Especially since we still have a ton of leftover Bush appointees in various positions cui bono Nov 2013 #64
Yeah, we don't need them brush Nov 2013 #63
Another way to look at it BootinUp Nov 2013 #76
What do you mean it going to? ,,,,,, INdemo Nov 2013 #78
Farther to the right - get a move on. jwirr Nov 2013 #79
It's a good switch to make. gulliver Nov 2013 #81
How many R to D converts could realistically be replaced with an acceptably progressive "real" D? brooklynite Nov 2013 #84
I only vote for progressives. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2013 #85
Better to have them inside the tent, pissing out, than outside the tent, pissing in. backscatter712 Nov 2013 #86
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Before we jump for joy th...»Reply #23