Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)British Accuse David Miranda, Glenn Greenwald's Partner, Of 'Terrorism' [View all]
Last edited Sat Nov 2, 2013, 09:48 AM - Edit history (1)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/02/david-miranda-terrorism-glenn-greenwald-british_n_4199838.htmlBritish Accuse David Miranda, Glenn Greenwald's Partner, Of 'Terrorism'
Reuters
Nov 02, 2013
By Mark Hosenball
WASHINGTON, Nov 1 (Reuters) - British authorities claimed the domestic partner of reporter Glenn Greenwald was involved in "terrorism" when he tried to carry documents from former U.S. intelligence contractor Edward Snowden through a London airport in August, according to police and intelligence documents.
- snip -
At a London court hearing this week for Miranda's lawsuit, a document called a "Ports Circulation Sheet" was read into the record. It was prepared by Scotland Yard - in consultation with the MI5 counterintelligence agency - and circulated to British border posts before Miranda's arrival. The precise date of the document is unclear.
"Intelligence indicates that Miranda is likely to be involved in espionage activity which has the potential to act against the interests of UK national security," according to the document. "We assess that Miranda is knowingly carrying material the release of which would endanger people's lives," the document continued.
"Additionally the disclosure, or threat of disclosure, is designed to influence a government and is made for the purpose of promoting a political or ideological cause. This therefore falls within the definition of terrorism..."
"Additionally the disclosure, or threat of disclosure, is designed to influence a government and is made for the purpose of promoting a political or ideological cause. This therefore falls within the definition of terrorism..."
- snip -
A key hearing on Miranda's legal challenge is scheduled for next week. The new details of how and why British authorities decided to act against him, including extracts from police and MI5 documents, were made public during a preparatory hearing earlier this week.
British authorities have said in court that items seized from Miranda included electronic media containing 58,000 documents from the U.S. National Security Agency and its British counterpart, Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ).
MORE[p]
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
British Accuse David Miranda, Glenn Greenwald's Partner, Of 'Terrorism' [View all]
Hissyspit
Nov 2013
OP
Nobody could have anticipated that the state would expand the definition
Warren Stupidity
Nov 2013
#2
You know, I've had criminal clients walk from their first interview thinking
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#11
I think you are focusing on what could be done with the documents...as opposed to
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#61
Snowden was charged in June. I suspect Greenwald has been charged under seal.
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#73
I think you extrapolate poorly. Miranda was carrying stolen documents through
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#79
Idiotic. If my friend gives me a bike and then someone subsequently steals that bike...
Luminous Animal
Nov 2013
#93
Um, no...it's more like, if my friend gives me an intelligence assessment and
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#96
Your link is broken. Also...Miranda was stupid enough to go through Britian with stolen
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#9
Well, flying through Britian whilst in possession of materials stolen from GCHQ is
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#18
Well, yes. It is about intimidation. What flabbergasts me is the utter stupidity of
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#60
I haven't declared anyone guilty of anything. And the police selectively enforce the law
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#59
Where have you been? But don't make the mistake of thinking Snowden and Greenwald
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#80
Whereby the Brits prove they are as unhinged @ Snowden and Greenwald as the US
riderinthestorm
Nov 2013
#13
actually all are "lap-dogs" of the global private central banking network, spawned from The City
Snowfield
Nov 2013
#42
My mind can barely deal with these facts at a distance, let alone in reality. This should be an OP.
libdem4life
Nov 2013
#44