Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

surfdog

(624 posts)

26. Holy fucking shit

Reply to Downtown Hound (Reply #23)

Wed Mar 7, 2012, 02:04 PM

Mar 2012

Are you serious?

You're asking why it was relevant to what Osama bin Laden was doing when he was shot when you were the one that brought up that your Yemen buddy wasn't doing anything illegal when he was

You brought up the point it's relevant because you brought it up

So it was legal to kill Osama bin Laden because he was involved in the planning of the attacks but it's not okay to kill your Yemen buddy when he was involved in planning attacks

Such massive hypocrisy

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Holder spells out why drones target US citizens [View all] woo me with science Mar 2012 OP

Fantabulous! Nt xchrom Mar 2012 #1

You know if you put Rush Limbaugh in the thread title bighart Mar 2012 #2

+1000 sad sally Mar 2012 #3

Behold the DU3. nt woo me with science Mar 2012 #5

Rush Limbaugh's 20+ years of hate filled demagoguery has only helped bring this about. Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #16

From last October: sad sally Mar 2012 #4

Thank you. nt woo me with science Mar 2012 #6

Kick woo me with science Mar 2012 #7

Where are all the people that SHOULD BE ALARMED BY THIS? bighart Mar 2012 #8

Duck and cover? nt Trillo Mar 2012 #9

Holder is an embarrassment. hifiguy Mar 2012 #10

I am confused surfdog Mar 2012 #11

We do attack police departments when they shoot people and there are reviews sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #12

I guess you admitted it right there surfdog Mar 2012 #13

No, actually I said that when such a killing occurs there has to be proof that it was sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #30

You're really confused? gratuitous Mar 2012 #15

You're kidding right ? surfdog Mar 2012 #19

According to whom? gratuitous Mar 2012 #32

"The police have the authority to shoot and kill a dangerous suspect without giving him a trial" Downtown Hound Mar 2012 #18

Oh please surfdog Mar 2012 #20

Why not arrest him and prove it in court? Downtown Hound Mar 2012 #21

Hmmm....crickets. Why are you afraid to answer this question? Downtown Hound Mar 2012 #24

I think we Asked bin Laden to turn himself in surfdog Mar 2012 #28

So you're saying that a Seal team can get in close enough to kill him but not bring him in? Downtown Hound Mar 2012 #33

Oh and, that's not really an answer. Downtown Hound Mar 2012 #36

Go ahead and tell me what Osama bin Laden was doing when we killed surfdog Mar 2012 #22

Um, I happen to think killing Bin Laden was a dumb thing to do Downtown Hound Mar 2012 #23

Holy fucking shit surfdog Mar 2012 #26

There were charges against Bin Laden. What were the charges against Al Awlaki and sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #31

"So it was legal to kill Osama bin Laden because he was involved Downtown Hound Mar 2012 #34

Hey Holder, do the world a big favor and take a big bite out of an African bee hive. n/t Downtown Hound Mar 2012 #14

Any democrat with any "pro" sensibility would condemn this asshole Ichingcarpenter Mar 2012 #17

This thread reminds me of .... surfdog Mar 2012 #25

Actually 23 hour lockdown is only used for prisoners that have broken rules Downtown Hound Mar 2012 #35

The corollary being, "it's ok if you're a democrat..." LanternWaste Mar 2012 #37

He left out the part about "looking tough" in an election trumps the constitution. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2012 #27

And how tragic that we now raise American citizens woo me with science Mar 2012 #29