General Discussion

Ms. Toad

(38,647 posts)

94. It isn't unknown because it is complicated -

Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:24 AM

Nov 2013

it is unknown because it is not public information. I have no idea how complicated their tax return is.

I was correcting a mistake the NYT reporter should not have made. What you owe (or get back) at the end of the year has nothing to do with how much you paid in taxes for the year. What the article reported was GE's balance due or refund for the year - which has nothing to do with how much it paid in taxes for the year.

If it is appropriate to slam GE, it ought to be done using facts - not fiction. That is my only point.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

96 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

There�s something absolutely insane happening in the House of Representatives right now. [View all] n2doc Oct 2013 OP

And Congress continues to give away the store . . n/t annabanana Oct 2013 #1

The House but not the Senate. n/t pnwmom Oct 2013 #67

k&r... spanone Oct 2013 #2

"These bills have been roundly criticized by the Treasury Department, consumer groups, and pampango Oct 2013 #3

Yet again Grayson is front and center shouting out what is wrong with our political system! Miranda4peace Oct 2013 #22

Yes absolutely! mrsadm Oct 2013 #71

Rep Alan Grayson.... ReRe Oct 2013 #73

GE CEO & Spokesperson for Obama's Jobs Initiative was on Bloomberg KoKo Oct 2013 #4

GE plays an important role in bringing manufacturing jobs back to the US Chico Man Oct 2013 #23

Does this mean GE will be paying sulphurdunn Oct 2013 #26

It must be great working for GE Chico Man Oct 2013 #40

I'm not at all sure sulphurdunn Oct 2013 #60

How does a GE employee's income tax have anything to do with GE paying taxes as a corporation? cui bono Oct 2013 #82

GE actually did pay taxes in 2010 Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #92

GE paid taxes sulphurdunn Nov 2013 #93

It isn't unknown because it is complicated - Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #94

In the whole interview Immelt didn't mention USA Manufacturing KoKo Oct 2013 #34

GE has about 17,000 wind turbines deployed globally Chico Man Oct 2013 #41

I'm not saying that they don't provide some necessary functions.... KoKo Oct 2013 #44

BS, sorry. lark Oct 2013 #47

Well. that's a stick in the eye Chico Man Oct 2013 #49

140,000 domestic employees? JDPriestly Oct 2013 #58

You obviously don't know anyone that works for GE Chico Man Oct 2013 #63

I would gladly stand in front of any GE employee and say those things. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #76

They are hiring - plenty of open positions here in the US Chico Man Nov 2013 #88

Are YOU a GE employee? nt tblue37 Oct 2013 #79

Stockholder, more likely. n/t cui bono Oct 2013 #83

Unlikely scenario. sulphurdunn Oct 2013 #61

We should revert to before the industrial revolution Chico Man Oct 2013 #64

Technically, we can quakerboy Oct 2013 #72

Simplistic viewpoint Chico Man Nov 2013 #89

Some things are actually fairly simple quakerboy Nov 2013 #91

The ramifications of technical progress Chico Man Nov 2013 #95

It seems more accurate quakerboy Nov 2013 #96

And how may jobs would be lost DocMac Oct 2013 #74

"Much of the manufacturing, however, will be done by robots."--- tblue37 Oct 2013 #78

Unless we use robots to build and maintain the robots Chico Man Nov 2013 #90

They are simply doing the job they are paid to do. Bonhomme Richard Oct 2013 #5

THE LOOTING CONTINUES. woo me with science Oct 2013 #6

Chris Hedges addressed this in "Our Invisible Revolution" KoKo Oct 2013 #37

Republicans control the House. Laelth Oct 2013 #7

Are you shocked at the Democrats supporting this? n/t n2doc Oct 2013 #8

Some Democrats are supporting this. Laelth Oct 2013 #13

the bill is currently enjoying �broad bipartisan support� in the House Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #9

That is disappointing, to be sure. n/t Laelth Oct 2013 #14

Derivative trading should be against the law in the first place. RC Oct 2013 #10

I agree. LuvNewcastle Oct 2013 #12

Well put... IthinkThereforeIAM Oct 2013 #39

+1 leftstreet Oct 2013 #43

+1 cut to the core grahamhgreen Oct 2013 #81

They won't be satisfied until this country is a living hell. LuvNewcastle Oct 2013 #11

Me too... EnviroBat Oct 2013 #25

There really is no where to go sulphurdunn Oct 2013 #29

Ok, this has to stop.. and it will, in the Senate! mountain grammy Oct 2013 #15

Love the OP title - it is always accurate, any time of the day or night when the GOP NRaleighLiberal Oct 2013 #16

Title of the Bill? diva77 Oct 2013 #17

I couldn't find the name/# after going through Ilsa Oct 2013 #18

One is H.R. 992 or the �Swaps Regulatory Improvement Act� muriel_volestrangler Oct 2013 #20

Thanks!! diva77 Oct 2013 #24

Damn, I might need a break from politics tavalon Oct 2013 #19

Money whores, simply money whores. JimboBillyBubbaBob Oct 2013 #21

Oh dear! I keep forgetting I'm not in Kansas! Southside Oct 2013 #27

I'm definitely in the wrong business Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #28

Business as usual, huh? Jackpine Radical Oct 2013 #30

the word is corrupt, not insane. unblock Oct 2013 #31

�broad bipartisan support� Enthusiast Oct 2013 #32

Sometimes I just want to give up! Brain overload. n/t Paper Roses Oct 2013 #33

Which is the intent. It's called The Shock Doctrine. n/t Oilwellian Oct 2013 #36

This is the stealth bullshit these incumbents must be made to pay for at the ballot box. ancianita Oct 2013 #35

The next bail out will be to confiscate deposits from customers instead of the Fed; like what DhhD Oct 2013 #38

What's new? Comrade Grumpy Oct 2013 #42

Industry lobbyists writing legislation? Glaisne Oct 2013 #45

The Root of all Evil packman Oct 2013 #46

They start messing with derivatives blue-wave Oct 2013 #48

When it comes to banking, they're all sockpuppets. dorkulon Oct 2013 #50

I get to grade some papers of high school seniors Plucketeer Oct 2013 #51

fucking republican business whores gopiscrap Oct 2013 #52

to understand it, follow the money. nt arthritisR_US Oct 2013 #53

There are differences between Democrats and Rethuglicans but ... Swede Atlanta Oct 2013 #54

The corruption is complete. DeSwiss Oct 2013 #55

I want to know the NAMES of the Democrats backing this bill, and I want to know precisely JDPriestly Oct 2013 #56

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Oct 2013 #57

When it comes to screwing us obxhead Oct 2013 #59

+1. jsr Oct 2013 #66

I think they are coordinated with the Alan Greenspan book rollout and rollback. SleeplessinSoCal Oct 2013 #62

Let these guys explain how derivative trading works ThoughtCriminal Oct 2013 #65

Campaign finance reform neffernin Oct 2013 #68

Thanks, Citizens United DallasNE Oct 2013 #69

The anxiety of just thinking polynomial Oct 2013 #70

CONTACT the Crazy DEMS Tigress DEM Oct 2013 #75

Savvy! blkmusclmachine Oct 2013 #77

No No No. The people DEMAND Collateralized Debt Obligations! Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #80

Shame on Democrats.... bobGandolf Oct 2013 #84

and they wonder why they have low approval ratings. . B Calm Oct 2013 #85

'broad bipartisan support' -has a nice ring to it, don't cha think? KG Oct 2013 #86

Thank an investor. You get what you pay for. Too bad we all have to live in their mess. nt raouldukelives Oct 2013 #87